نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشیار علوم سیاسی دانشگاه شیراز، شیراز، ایران

2 استادیار معارف اسلامی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی بوشهر، بوشهر، ایران

چکیده

   در ارتباط با توسعه اقتصادی در دولت پهلوی اول، دو دیدگاه وجود دارد. برخی آن را تحولی اساسی می‌دانند. در حالی بسیاری از پژوهشگران معتقدند که در دولت رضاشاه تحولی عمیق در حوزه اقتصاد و صنعت به وجود نیامد. هرچند در ظاهر شکلی از نوسازی اقتصادی رخ نمود. در این میان، یکی از نظریاتی که می‌تواند دگرگونی‌های اقتصادی در آن دوره را مورد ارزیابی قرار دهد، نظریه دولت توسعه‌گراست که این مقاله تلاش می‌کند با استعانت ممکن از مفروضات این نظریه، آن را در ارتباط با فعالیت‌های صنعتی و اقتصادی دوره رضاشاه به آزمون بگذارد. بر این اساس سؤالی که این پژوهش درصد پاسخ‌گویی به آن برآمده این است که تحولات اقتصادی در دوران رضاشاه چه نسبتی با نظریه دولت توسعه‌گرا داشته است؟ نتایج پژوهش نشان می‌دهد اگرچه، به ظاهر برخی از عناصر این نظریه از جمله بوروکراسی کارآمد، ضعف جامعه مدنی، تأسیس ارتش دائمی و برخی نخبگان توسعه‌گرا بر رویکردهای سیاسی و اقتصادی آن دوره منطبق است، اما در حقیقت فقدان نهاد برنامه‌ریز توسعه، عدم همکاری دولت با طبقات اجتماعی، محیط نامساعد بین‌المللی، حذف نخبگان توسعه‌گرا و جایگزینی آن‌ها با نخبگان غیر توسعه‌گرا در کنار بی‌اعتنایی رضاشاه به برخی اقدام لازم برای توسعه مانند اصلاحات ارضی که به مثابه زیرساخت تحقق توسعه محسوب می‌شود مبین آن است که نسبتی حقیقی بین این نظریه و تحول اقتصادی در آن دوره، وجود ندارد. روش این مقاله کیفی و اطلاعات لازم از منابع اصیل مانند خاطرات گردآوری شده است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Criticism and Evaluation of the Economic Development Model During Reza Shah’s Reign with Emphasis on the Theory of Developmental State

نویسندگان [English]

  • Ebrahim Abbasi 1
  • Mohammad Jamiri 2

1 Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Theology, Bushehr University of Medical Sciences, Bushehr, Iran

چکیده [English]

Extended Abstract
Introduction
The theory of developmental state is an approach to industrial and economic development that shares certain features with the policies of Reza Shah’s regime in Iran. This perspective has often been used in Iran to explain the industrial trajectories of the Asian Tigers, as well as to analyze the efforts to adapt to the industrialization trend in the post-Islamic Revolution period. However, the core assumptions of this theory have not yet been thoroughly examined concerning the industrial and economic transformations that occurred during Reza Shah’s rule. In this respect, the present study tried to answer the question of whether Reza Shah’s industrial and financial measures can be understood within the theory of the developmental state. The objective was to evaluate the key indicators of this theory and assess how they align with the developments that took place during Reza Shah’s reign.
Materials and Methods
The current study adopted a qualitative and explanatory approach, and drew on primary sources such as memoirs, documents, and authentic analytical works from the period to address the research question. Moreover, the theory of developmental state was used as the framework of analysis. The concept of developmental state (also known as developmentalist state) offers a theoretical framework that can help evaluate the economic transformations of Reza Shah’s reign. This theory is based on the idea that government intervention can play a central role the country’s industrial development process. The term developmental state was first popularized by Chalmers Johnson, who used it to describe a theoretical model to explain a reality derived from the experiences of countries such as Japan, Indonesia, South Korea, Botswana, and Taiwan. A distinguishing feature of these countries was their continuous and sustainable economic growth—averaging 4% or more over two decades—accompanied by the increased level of welfare and living standards and effective inflation control. Although these governments did not follow economically liberal models and often advocated for a maximalist system, they simultaneously provided significant support to the private sector through a highly effective and efficient bureaucracy. The theory of developmental state was later developed further by scholars such as Peter Evans and Adrian Leftwich. Leftwich defines developmental states as those whose domestic policies and foreign relations are aimed at gaining power, autonomy, independence, capability, and capacity. These goals are pursued either through the direct organization of economic growth or by fostering conditions that encourage it—or a combination of the two.
Results and Discussion
The indicators of a developmental state, as applied to the context of Reza Shah’s regime, included a centralized and comprehensive bureaucracy, developmental elites, the absence of a central development body in Iran, state independence, a favorable international environment, and the neglect of agriculture. First, a key requirement of a developmental state is a centralized and comprehensive bureaucracy that extends across the entire country. In this context, bureaucracy refers to a powerful, proficient, and corruption-free network. Prior to the Pahlavi period, Iran lacked such a unified bureaucratic system. With Reza Khan’s rise to power, the need to concentrate power in order to counter internal fragmentation and promote national unity led to the establishment of a unified and comprehensive bureaucracy. However, from the outset, Iran’s administrative system faced significant intellectual, cultural, and managerial challenges. These obstacles prevented it from evolving into an agile, dynamic, and corruption-resistant system. As a result, the bureaucratic system became a persistent obstacle to development—one that continues to affect the country to this day. The administrative system remains dependent, passive, and informal. Within such systems, managers tend to be subordinate to the decisions coming from the top of the political pyramid. The second key indicator was the role of developmental elites. Elites—both executive and intellectual—are regarded as essential to transforming society and advancing the objectives of the state. Under Reza Shah’s regime, Iran’s political elite could be broadly categorized into two groups. The first included individuals such as Davar, Hekmat, Foroughi, and Taghizadeh, who were primarily intellectuals and played a significant role in shaping the cultural and ideological foundations of the state. The second group, which exercised greater influence over political and executive affairs, comprised figures like Teimur Tash, the powerful Minister of the Court, Nosrat al-Dowleh Firouz, Seyyed Mohammad Tadayyon, and Sardar Asad. This dominant group entrenched irrational, self-centered, and anti-developmental practices within government operations, effectively limiting opportunities for capable and competent elites to emerge and advance. In addition, none of the elites during Reza Shah’s reign—including Foroughi, Hekmat, Davar, Kasravi, Taghizadeh, Bahar, and others—produced any substantial work on Iran’s industrial or economic development. Their intellectual contributions, including newspaper articles, were overwhelmingly focused on cultural, literary, political, and civilizational issues. Another important indicator was the absence of a central development body in Iran. The existence of a central organization capable of managing national development through well-designed planning is an essential component of a successful developmental state. Such an institution ensures policy coherence and helps identify and nurture talent. However, during Reza Shah’s rule, no such organization existed. While there were efforts toward industrialization and modernization, the idea of systematic, planned economic development was not operationalized until Reza Shah’s exile. According to Ebtehaj, the failure to institutionalize planning during this period stemmed from Reza Shah’s resistance to the centralization of planning. The fourth indicator was state independence, which refers to the state’s autonomy from reliance on social classes. In the case of Iran, the state was not dependent on any particular class but operated beyond class affiliations. Reza Shah, as the founder of the Pahlavi dynasty, did not view his government as being indebted to any social group or class. Iran’s historical experience suggests that although his regime maintained independence from all social groups, it was also distinctly isolated from them. On the one hand, the government was entirely detached from the religious leadership and groups—who constituted the majority of the population—and there was little to no shared logic. On the other hand, ties with traditional and small merchants—who represented the backbone of Iran’s commercial sector—were also severed.  A favorable international environment is another critical factor in enabling a developmental state. Without a suitable international environment is essential for the export and competitiveness of domestically produced good, developmentalist states face significant challenges. Many argue that the conditions in South Korea and Taiwan after World War II were exceptional. These included unwavering U.S. support aimed at curbing the spread of communism, as well as the broader conditions of the Cold War. In contrast, Iran faced a different set of challenges. During the same period, the competing interests of major powers—particularly Britain and the Soviet Union—acted as major obstacles to Iran’s development. Between the two world wars, Iran was exposed to the rivalry of the superpowers, and its development became subject to their pledge and distraint. The last and sixth indicator was the neglect of agriculture during the reign of Reza Shah. Agriculture was of great importance for reasons such as leveraging the value-added potential of the agricultural sector for industrial expansion, countering the influence of communism, and ensuring the production of affordable and essential food for the population in the developmental state. At the same time, attention to agriculture, along with land reforms in Iran, was necessary and essential, but these goals were not realized in practice. This neglect can be attributed to factors such as the Shah himself becoming the largest landowner in the country.
 
Conclusion
The research findings indicate that although certain elements of the theory—such as a proficient bureaucracy, a weak civil society, a permanent army, and developmental elites—appear consistent with the political and economic approaches of Reza Shah’s reign, in practice, several critical factors undermined a true alignment. These include the absence of a development planning body, the government’s lack of engagement with social classes, an unfavorable international environment, the elimination of developmental elites and their replacement with non-developmental ones, and Reza Shah’s neglect of essential development measures, such as land reforms, which are considered foundational for national development. What was necessary for real production—across industry, agriculture, services, and especially science and technology—was not achieved, with most sectors remaining subordinate to foreign markets. Iran’s industrial expansion strategy was driven by individual preferences rather than being organization-oriented and purposeful. No organization or collective body was involved in planning economic and industrial growth. For these reasons, despite sharing some characteristics with the theory of developmental state—such as a weak civil society and a permanent army—Reza Shah’s administration cannot be classified as developmentalist.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Development
  • Developmental state
  • Reza Shah
  • Pahlavi state
  • Industrial transformation
  • فارسی

    • آبراهامیان، یرواند. (1377). ایران بین دو انقلاب. احمد گل‌محمدی و محمدابراهیم فتاحی. تهران. نشر نی.
    • ازغندی، علیرضا(1376). ناکارآمدی نخبگان سیاسی ایران بین دو انقلاب. تهران. نشر قومس.
    • ابتهاج، ابوالحسن.(1371). خاطرات. به کوشش علیرضا عروضی. تهران. انتشارات علمی.
    • اوانز، پیتر(1380). توسعه یا چپاول: نقش دولت در تحول صنعتی. عباس زندباف و عباس مخبر. تهران. طرح نو
    • بهار، محمدتقی.(1354). دیوان اشعار. با تلاش محمد ملک‌زاده. تهران. انتشارات امیرکبیر.
    • پارسونز، آنتونی(1363). غرور و سقوط. منوچهر راستین. تهران. انتشارات هفته.
    • پسران، محمدهاشم.(1378). توسعه اقتصادی و شورشهای انقلابی، ترجمه منصور عباسی. نامه پژوهش. شماره 12 و13. 107-141
    • دلفروز، محمدتقی.(1393). دولت و توسعه اقتصادی. تهران. انتشارات آگاه.
    • رضا قلی، علی.(1381). جامعهشناسی نخبه کشی. تهران. نشر نی.
    • سمیعی، علیرضا.(1386). دولت مطلقه مدرن و نوسازی اقتصادی و اداری در ایران در دولت مدرن در ایران(441-497) به کوشش رسول افضلی. قم. دانشگاه مفید.
    • سردارنیا، خلیل‌الله.(1386). دولت مطلقه مدرن و عدم شکلگیری توسعه سیاسی در ایران در دولت مدرن در ایران(311-359) به کوشش رسول افضلی. قم. دانشگاه مفید.
    • عجم‌اوغلو، دارون و رابینسون، جیمز.(1397). چرا ملتها شکست میخورند. ترجمه علی حبیبی. تهران. نور علم.
    • عباسی، مهدی (1385). دولت توسعه‌خواه در ایران. فرهنگ اندیشه. سال پنجم، شماره 19، 215-239
    • غنی، قاسم.(1361). زندگانی من. به کوشش سیروس غنی. تهران. نشر آفتاب.
    • فوران، جان.(1378). مقاومت شکننده. ترجمه احمد تدین. تهران. انتشارات رسا.
    • فیوضات، ابراهیم.(1375). دولت در عصر پهلوی، تهران، چاپخش.
    • فروغی، محمدعلی.(1378). مجموع مقالات. جلد دوم. تهران، توس.
    • قاضی، نعمت‌الله.(1372). علل سقوط حکومت رضاشاه. تهران. نشر آثار
    • کاتوزیان، محمدعلی (همایون).(1377). اقتصاد سیاسی ایران. تهران. نشر مرکز.
    • کاتوزیان، محمدعلی(همایون).(1380) استبداد، دموکراسی و نهضت ملی. تهران. نشر مرکز
    • کدی، نیکی.(1375). ریشههای انقلاب ایران. ترجمه عبدالرحیم گواهی. تهران. دفتر نشر فرهنگ اسلامی.
    • کرونین، استفانی.(1387). ارتش، جامعه مدنی و دولت در ایران در تجدد آمرانه (140-180)، به کوشش تورج اتابکی. ترجمه مهدی حقیقت‌بین. تهران. نشر ققنوس
    • گراهام،رابرت.(1358). ایران سراب قدرت. مترجم فیروز فیروز نیا. تهران. سحاب کتاب.
    • لفتوویچ، آدریان.(1378). دمکراسی و توسعه. ترجمه احمد علیقلیان و افشین خاکباز. تهران. طرح نو.
    • لمتون، آن.(1363). مالک و زارع در ایران. تهران. انتشارات علمی و فرهنگی.
    • مصدق، محمد.(بی‌تا). خاطرات و تأملات. به کوشش ایرج افشار. تهران. چاپ پنجم. انتشارات علمی.
    • میرسپاسی، علی.(1384). تأملی در مدرنیته ایرانی. ترجمه جلال توکلیان. تهران. طرح نو.
    • موثقی، احمد و کاهه، علی رضا. (1364). دولت توسعه‌خواه و زمینه‌های توسعه در ایران. سیاست. مجله دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی. دوره 45. شماره 4.
    • مکی، حسین.(1374)، تاریخ بیست‌ساله. جلد چهارم و ششم. تهران. انتشارات علمی
    • مخبرالسلطنه هدایت، مهدی قلی.(1364). خاطرات و خطرات. تهران. انتشارات علمی
    • نبوی، سید عبدالامیر.(1390). ایران و دولت توسعه‌گرا ( 1320 تا 1357). پژوهش‌نامه علوم سیاسی. سال ششم، شماره سوم.
    • نقیب‌زاده احمد و داراب زاده، عاطفه.(1398). دولت مدرن در تله بنیان‌گذار. پژوهش‌نامه علوم سیاسی. سال 14، شماره 4.ص 200 - 224

    نقیب‌زاده احمد و دلفروز، محمدتقی.(1394). بررسی فرایند اقتصادی کره جنوبی در چارچوب الگوی دولت توسعه گرای غیر دموکراتیک. سیاست. مجله دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی. دوره 45. شماره 4. ص 1015 -1032).

    • همایون، داریوش.( 1393)، آیندگان و روندگان، گردآورنده حسین دهباشی. تهران. سازمان اسناد و کتابخانه ملی ایران.
    • هانتر، شیرین.(1397). سیاست خارجی ایران بعد از فروپاشی شوروی. ترجمه سیدجواد صالحی و فریبرز ارغوانی. مرکز پژوهش‌های علمی و مطالعات استراتژیک خاورمیانه. تهران.

     

    References

    • Banani,Amin.(1960). The modernization of iran. california, Stanford University
    • Vaghefi, Mohammad Reza.(1975). ENTERPRENEURS OF IRAN. Palo Alto, California.

     

    Translated References into English

    1-      Abrahamian, Yervand (1998). Iran Between Two Revolutions. Ahmad Golmohammadi and Mohammad Ebrahim Fattahi. Tehran. Ney Publications. [In Persian].

    2-      Azghandi, Alireza (1997). Ineffectiveness of Iran's Political Elite Between Two Revolutions. Tehran. Qomes Publications. [In Persian].

    3-      Ebtehaj, Abolhasan (1992). Memoirs. With efforts of Alireza Orouzi. Tehran. Elmi Publications. [In Persian].

    4-      Evans, Peter (2001). Development or Plunder: Role of Government in Industrial Transformation. Abbas Zandbaf and Abbas Mokhber. Tehran. Tarh-e-No, [In Persian].

    5-      Bahar, Mohammad Taghi (1975). Poetry Collection. With efforts of Mohammad Malekzadeh. Tehran. Amir Kabir Publications. [In Persian].

    6-      Parsons, Anthony (1984). Pride and Fall. Manouchehr Rastin. Tehran. Hafteh Publications. [In Persian].

    7-      Pesaran, Mohammad Hashem (1999). Economic Development and Revolutionary Insurgencies, translated by Mansour Abbasi. Nameh-e-Pazhouhesh. No. 12 and 13. 107-141. [In Persian].

    8-      Delforuz, Mohammad Taghi (2014). Government and Economic Development. Tehran. Agah Publications. [In Persian].

    9-      Reza Gholi, Ali (2002). Sociology of Eliticide (Elitocide). Tehran. Ney Publications. [In Persian].

    10-    Samiei, Alireza (2007). Modern Absolute State and Economic and Administrative Renovation in Iran in the Modern State in Iran (441-497) with the efforts of Rasoul Afzali. Qom. Mofid University. [In Persian].

    11-    Sardarnia, Khalilullah (2007). Modern Absolute State and Lack of Formation of Political Development in Iran in the Modern State in Iran (311-359) by Rasoul Afzali. Qom. Mofid University. [In Persian].

    12-    Ajamoglu, Darun and Robinson, James (2018). Why do Nations fail? Translated by Ali Habibi. Tehran. Nour Elm. [In Persian].

    13-    Abbasi, Mehdi (2006). Developmental State in Iran. Quarterly Journal of the Culture of Thought. Year 5, Issue 19, 215-239. [In Persian].

    14-    Ghani, Qasem (1982). My Life. Translated by Sirous Ghani. Tehran. Aftab Publications. [In Persian].

    15-    Foran, Jan (1999). Fragile Resistance. Translated by Ahmad Tadayyon. Tehran. Rasa Publications. [In Persian].

    16-    Foyuzat, Ebrahim (1996). State in Pahlavi Era, Tehran, Chapakhsh. [In Persian].

    17-    Foroughi, Mohammad Ali (1999). Collection of Papers. Volume 2. Tehran, Toos. [In Persian].

     

    18-    Ghazi, Nematollah (1993). Causes of the Fall of Reza Shah's Reign. Tehran. Asar Publications. [In Persian].

    19-    Katouzian, Mohammad Ali (Homayun) (1998). Political Economy of Iran. Tehran. Markaz Publications. [In Persian].

    20-    Katouzian, Mohammad Ali (Homayun) (1999). Despotism, Democracy, and National Movement. Tehran. Markaz Publications. [In Persian].

    21-    Kodi, Niki (1996). The Roots of the Iranian Revolution. Translated by Abdolrahim Gohi. Tehran. Islamic Culture Publication House. [In Persian].

    22-    Cronin, Stephanie (1998). The Army, Civil Society, and State in Iran in Authoritarian Modernity (140-180) by Touraj Atabaki. Translated by Mehdi Haghighatbin. Tehran. Qoqnos Publications. [In Persian].

    23-    Graham, Robert (1979). Iran, the Mirage of Power. Translated by Firouz Firouznia. Tehran. Sahab Ketab. [In Persian].

    24-    Leftwich, Adrian (1999). Democracy and Development. Translated by Ahmad Aliqolian and Afshin Khakbaz. Tehran. Tarh-e-No. [In Persian].

    25-    Lambton, Ann (1984). Owner and Farmer in Iran. Tehran. Scientific and Cultural Publications. [In Persian].

    26-    Mosaddegh, Mohammad (Bita). Memoirs and Reflections. With efforts of Iraj Afshar. Tehran. Fifth edition. Elmi publications. [In Persian].

    27-    Mirsepasi, Ali (2005). Reflections on Iranian Modernity. Translated by Jalal Tavakkolian. Tehran. Tarh-e-No. [In Persian].

    28-    Movassaghi, Ahmad and Kaheh, Alireza (1985). The Developmental State and Fields of Development in Iran. Politics Quarterly. Journal of the Faculty of Law and Political Sciences. Volume 45. Issue 4. [In Persian].

    29-    Makki, Hossein (1995), Twenty-Year History. Volumes 4 and 6. Tehran. Elmi Publications. [In Persian].

    30-    Mokhber-al-Saltaneh Hedayat, Mehdiqoli (1985). Memoirs and Dangers. Tehran. Elmi Publications. [In Persian].

    31-    Nabavi, Seyyed Abdol-Amir (2011). Iran and Developmental State (1941 to 1978). Political Science Research Journal. Year 6, Issue 3. [In Persian].

    32-    Naqibzadeh Ahmad and Darabzadeh, Atefeh (2019). Modern State in Founder's Trap. Journal Research of Political Science. Year 14, No. 4. pp. 200 – 224. [In Persian].

    33-    Naqibzadeh Ahmad and Delforuz, Mohammad Taghi (2015). A Study of the Economic Process of South Korea Within the Framework of Non-Democratic Developmental State Model. Politics Quarterly. Journal of Faculty of Law and Political Science. Volume 45. Issue 4. pp. 1015-1032. [In Persian].

    34-    Homayoun, Daryoush (2014), Futures and Goers, compiled by Hossein Dehbashi. Tehran. National Library and Archives Organization of Iran. [In Persian].

    35-    Hunter, Shirin (2018). Iran's Foreign Policy after the Collapse of the Soviet Union. Translated by Seyyed Javad Salehi and Fariborz Arghavani. Center for Scientific Research and Strategic Studies of the Middle East. Tehran. [In Persian].