نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت دولتی، دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران، ایران.

2 دکتری گروه پژوهشی پژوهشکده فرهنگ و ارتباطات دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران، ایران.

10.22054/tssq.2026.85216.1647

چکیده

تحول و تعالی نظام قانونگذاری از اصول اساسی و ضروری در ساختار حکمرانی پارلمانی در کشور به شمار می‌رود. در این راستا، تحول مجلس شورای اسلامی به عنوان نماد مردم‌سالاری دینی با اتکا بر فناوری‌های نوین و هوشمندسازی فرآیندها با تمرکز بر تقویت و نظام‌مند ساختن مشارکت مردمی به منظور ارتقای کارکردهای قانونگذاری، نظارت و امور نمایندگی، غیرقابل اجتناب است. مشارکت مردمی علاوه بر تسهیل و افزایش مقبولیت تصمیمات، به پیش‌بینی بازخوردهای اجتماعی و دستیابی به راهکارهای عملیاتی کمک کرده و زمینه‌ساز کارآمدی نظام حکمرانی و رشد شهروندان می‌شود. پژوهش حاضر در پی ارائه چارچوبی برای تحقق حکمرانی هوشمند با تمرکز بر مشارکت عمومی در مجلس شورای اسلامی است. در این راستا، پس از مرور نظام‌مند ادبیات و بررسی ۲۷ پژوهش منتخب، یک چارچوب اولیه تهیه و سپس در گروه کانونی متشکل از ۱۳ نفر از خبرگان این حوزه تدقیق و متناسب‌سازی شد. این چارچوب بر مبنای تقسیم‌بندی سطوح مشارکت شهروندان در چهار سطح (آگاه‌سازی، مشورت‌گیری، درگیرسازی و تفویض امور) و پنج عرصه مشارکت (مسئله‌یابی و اولویت‌بندی، تدوین و شکل‌گیری قوانین، ارزشیابی مصوبات، نظارت بر اجرای قوانین، مطالبه‌گری و تقویت کارکرد نمایندگی) طراحی گردید. همچنین، ابعاد کارکردی ظرفیت‌ساز در حکمرانی هوشمند در پارلمان، شامل هماهنگی، تقسیم کار نهادی، تشویق مشارکت و تعیین اقدامات لازم، برای تحقق این اهداف پیشنهاد شد. پیاده‌سازی چارچوب پیشنهادی، منجر به استفاده حداکثری و نظام‌مند از ظرفیت‌های مردمی و نخبگانی در راستای ارتقای نظام قانونگذاری و افزایش کارآمدی مجلس شورای اسلامی خواهد شد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Providing a Smart Governance Framework with a Focus on Public Participation: Case Study: The Islamic Consultative Assembly

نویسندگان [English]

  • Iman Akbari, 1
  • Maryam Razmjou 2

1 PhD, Department of Public Administration, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran.

2 PhD, Culture and Communication Research Institute, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran.

چکیده [English]

Introduction
The digitalization of societies has transformed governance structures and reshaped the way they are organized. In this context, emerging technologies have not only influenced how the world operates but have also revolutionized the use of modern tools to manage democratic processes and political engagement. Accordingly, parliaments, as the highest representative institutions in a democracy, need to reform their traditional methods to align with public demands and serve as pillars of stability and trust during times of political, security, and economic crises. In this process, data plays a fundamental role. Thus, moving toward a "smart parliament" is essential. Achieving "smart parliaments"—whose main goals are enhancing transparency, increasing accountability, facilitating public participation in policymaking and implementation, and improving the efficiency of legislative and oversight processes—requires a positive approach toward new technologies and their adoption as effective tools in the development of governance systems. In this regard, the Islamic Consultative Assembly, as a legislative body and representative of the people, can play a fundamental role in increasing the quality of governance by making its processes smarter. Although some measures have been taken, such as the approval of the Transparency Law and the launch of crowdfunding systems for laws, policy studies and past experiences show that there are serious gaps in achieving effective citizen participation in the legislative process.This research, therefore, seeks to analyze existing executive policies, identify current challenges, and propose a comprehensive model for leveraging technological capacities and enhancing public participation in order to advance smart legislative governance. Attaining this framework can lead to greater transparency, strengthened social capital, more participatory decision-making processes, and ultimately, improved efficiency and democratization of the Islamic Consultative Assembly. Overall, the main objective of this study is to present a comprehensive and practical framework for utilizing technological potential and public participation to smarten parliamentary governance.
Materials and Methods
The present study is a qualitative research conducted within an interpretive-constructivist paradigm, utilizing the meta-synthesis strategy based on the seven-stage model proposed by Sandelowski et al. (2007). The research population includes two main sections:
Scientific documents: Including articles, books, and theses published between 2011 and 2025 (1390 to 1403 in the Iranian calendar and 2000 to 2024 in the Gregorian calendar);
Focus groups: Including university professors, researchers in the field of smart parliament studies, managers from the Research Center of the Islamic Consultative Assembly, and experts from the Legal Affairs Department of the Parliament. In line with the meta-synthesis approach, purposive sampling was applied to both scientific documents and participants. As a result, 27 studies were selected for document analysis. Additionally, the snowball sampling method was used to identify suitable individuals for participation, leading to a final sample of 13 experts. Sampling adequacy was ensured using the theoretical sampling method, meaning the process continued until data saturation was achieved. To ensure the validity of the study, Lincoln and Guba's (1985) criteria—credibility, transferability, dependability, and confirmability—were employed. Credibility was achieved through systematic data analysis and continuous review of findings, while dependability was ensured through precise documentation and regular data verification. After completing the meta-synthesis and extracting the components of a smart governance framework with an emphasis on public participation, these components were discussed in focus group sessions. The findings were then adapted to the context of the Islamic Consultative Assembly (Iran's Parliament), and practical and operational recommendations were developed in line with the proposed framework. These recommendations were refined through iterative feedback and revisions.
Results and Discussion
The present study was conducted with the aim of providing a framework for smart governance focusing on public participation in the Islamic Consultative Assembly. Based on the results obtained, 4 main categories and 19 subcategories were identified in the form of 60 concepts based on the meta-synthesis method.
Based on the results of the present study, four categories: 1- Convergence and coordination at the governance level, 2- Division of institutional work in different parts of the Islamic Consultative Assembly, 3- Facilitation and encouragement of participation and interaction with society and citizens, and 4- Determination of tasks and necessary measures in order to develop the smart governance platform, were considered as functional dimensions affecting capacity building in smart parliamentary governance.
In the areas of citizen participation in smart governance, five areas appropriate to the parliament were identified and refined by the focus group, which include 1) Participation in problem identification and prioritization, 2) Formulation and formation of laws, 3) Evaluation of approvals, 4) Monitoring and evaluation of law implementation, and 5) Demanding and strengthening the function of representation.
Another component of the framework presented was the levels of citizen participation in smart governance, which was examined from four aspects: 1) transparency and awareness of citizens, 2) consultation and feedback from citizens, 3) cooperation and involvement of citizens, and 4) empowerment and delegation of decision-making to citizens.
The platforms for realizing public participation in smart governance of the Islamic Consultative Assembly are one of the important components of the presented framework, which includes six systems: 1) Transparency system of the Islamic Consultative Assembly, 2) Participation system in problem identification, 3) Citizen participation system in legislation, 4) Law Observatory, 5) Public communication system with representatives, and 6) Integrated public monitoring system. These systems have been proposed as a complement to the framework extracted from scientific literature and with the aim of adapting it to the conditions of the Islamic Consultative Assembly.
Conclusion
Smart governance with a focus on public participation in the Islamic Consultative Assembly requires creating appropriate platforms for citizen engagement with legislative, oversight, and policymaking processes. Achieving this goal requires providing prerequisites that, while strengthening the institutional capacity of the Assembly, pave the way for greater transparency, efficiency, and accountability. Also, it can be concluded that legal, supervisory and functional capacity building in the parliament will not only increase the efficiency and transparency of policies, but also provide the possibility of direct interaction of the people with the legislative body and will lead to the improvement of smart governance, promotion of social capital, increase of public trust and strengthening of the efficiency of the decision-making system.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Smart Governance
  • Public Participation
  • Smart Parliament
  • Smartification
  • Popularization
ردادی، محسن. (1402). واکاوی موضوع امید و امکان‌های تولید آن؛ با تأکید بر ظرفیت‌های ارتقای مشارکت‌های عمومی در مجلس شورای اسلامی. ماهنامه گزارش‌های کارشناسی مرکز پژوهش‌های مجلس شورای اسلامی، 31(12)، 1-30. doi: 10.22034/report.2024.16710.1676
زمانی، سمیه. (1402). مطالعه تطبیقی شیوه‌های مشارکت عمومی در فرایند قانونگذاری و پیشنهادهایی برای مجلس شورای اسلامی. ماهنامه گزارش های کارشناسی مرکز پژوهش های مجلس شورای اسلامی، 31(4)، 1-34. http://rc.majlis.ir/fa/report/show/1777502
غلامی نورآباد، هادی؛ میره‌ای، محمد و جاوید، علیرضا. (1401). تببین الگوی حکمروایی هوشمند با رویکرد مشارکت مردمی در تصمیم‌گیری شهری (نمونه موردی: شهر تهران). آمایش فضا و ژئوماتیک، ۲۶(۱)، ۱۱۹-۱۳۹. URL: http://hsmsp.modares.ac.ir/article-21-56749-fa.html
قیروانی، قائم؛ منتظری، محمد و زاهدی، شمس‌السادات. (1403). ارائه مدل عوامل مؤثر بر حکمرانی هوشمند در کشور. ارزش‌آفرینی در مدیریت کسب و کار، 4(1)، 279-301. doi: 10.22034/jvcbm.2023.402476.1128
محمدی هارونی، فهیمه و عبدالحسین‌زاده، محمد. (1402). خط‌مشی‌گذاری هوشمند، رویکردی نوین برای کارآمدسازی نظام تصمیم‌گیری و قانونگذاری کشور. ماهنامه گزارش‌های کارشناسی مرکز پژوهش‌های مجلس شورای اسلامی، 31(4)، 1-33. http://rc.majlis.ir/fa/report/show/1779263
معدنی، جواد. (1401). حکمرانی هوشمند: رویکردی نوین در تحقق مشارکت و همکاری مؤثر شهروندان. راهبرد، 31(3)، 407-440. doi: 10.22034/rahbord.2023.378262.1526
میرباقری، سمیه و عبدی، اسماعیل. (1401). مفهوم شناسی حکمرانی مشارکتی. ماهنامه گزارش‌های کارشناسی مرکز پژوهش‌های مجلس شورای اسلامی، 30(11)، 1-29. doi: 20.1001.1.29809525.1401.1401.11.46.3
میرزایی‌پور، محمد مهدی و محمودی، محمدهادی. (1402). توسعه فناوری‌های اطلاعاتی در جهت دموکراسی مستقیم. ماهنامه گزارش‌های کارشناسی مرکز پژوهش‌های مجلس شورای اسلامی، 31(4)، 24-1. Doi: 20.1001.1.29809525.1402.1402.4.63.3 
نجفی‌رستاقی، حیدر و عبدالحسین‌زاده، محمد. (1402). چالش‌ها و راهکارهای تحقق حکمرانی هوشمند در کشور و ارائه توصیه‌های سیاستی برای مجلس شورای اسلامی. مرکز پژوهش‌های شورای اسلامی.
نوریجانی، علی؛ اسلامی، حسین؛ افشانی، سیدعلیرضا و دهقان دهنوی، حسن. (1402). ارائه الگوی مطلوب حکمرانی دیجیتال در عصر جامعه شبکه‌ای. مطالعات رسانه‌های نوین، 9(34)، 429-399. doi: 10.22054/nms.2023.72100.1543
یوسفی، عطیه و عبدالحمید، مهدی. (1403). ارائه الگوی رصدخانه خط مشی و حکمرانی به عنوان تسهیل‌کننده حکمرانی هوشمند و شواهدمحور. پژوهش‌های مدیریت عمومی، 17(66)، 33-62. doi: 10.22111/jmr.2024.46105.6029
 
References
Afandi, S. A., Erdayani, R., Afandi, M. (2024). Open Parliament: Study from Indonesia and Philippines. Journal of Governance and Social Policy, 5(1), 126-147. Doi: 10.24815/gaspol.v5i1.38003
Aichholzer, G., Rose, G. (2020). Experience with digital tools in different types of e-participation. European E-democracy in practice, 93-140. doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27184-8
Akerboom, S., Craig, R. K. (2022). How law structures public participation in environmental decision making: A comparative law approach. Environmental Policy and Governance, 32(3), 232-246. doi.org/10.1002/eet.1986
Alarabiat, A., Soares, D. S. (2016). Electronic participation through social media. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, 1(1), 191-194. doi.org/10.1145/2910019.2910109
Bastos, D., Fernández-Caballero, A., Pereira, A., Rocha, N. P. (2022). Smart city applications to promote citizen participation in city management and governance: A systematic review. In Informatics, 9(4), 1-29. doi.org/10.3390/informatics9040089
Bernaerts, K., Blanckaert, B., Caluwaerts, D. (2023). Institutional design and polarization. Do consensus democracies fare better in fighting polarization than majoritarian democracies? Democratization, 30(2), 153-172. doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2022.2117300
Bussu, S., Bua, A., Dean, R., Smith, G. (2022). Introduction: Embedding participatory governance. Critical Policy Studies, 16(2), 133-145. doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2022.2053179
Bynner, C., Escobar, O., Weakley, S. (2023). Facilitators as culture change workers: advancing public participation and deliberation in local governance. Local Government Studies, 49(4), 738-758. doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2023.2190586
Erjavec, T., Ogrodniczuk, M., Osenova, P., Ljubešić, N., Simov, K., Pančur, A., Fišer, D. (2023). The ParlaMint corpora of parliamentary proceedings. Language resources and evaluation, 57(1), 415-448. doi.org/10.1007/s10579-021-09574-0
Feeney, M. K., Welch, E. W. (2012). Electronic participation technologies and perceived outcomes for local government managers. Public Management Review, 14(6), 815-833. doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2011.642628
Furtado, L. S., da Silva, T. L. C., Ferreira, M. G. F., de Macedo, J. A. F., Cavalcanti, J. K. D. M. L. (2023). A framework for Digital Transformation towards Smart Governance: using big data tools to target SDGs in Ceará, Brazil. Journal of Urban Management, 12(1), 74-87. doi.org/10.1016/j.jum.2023.01.003
Giuliodori, A., Berrone, P., Ricart, J. E. (2023). Where smart meets sustainability: The role of Smart Governance in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals in cities. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 26(1), 27-44. doi.org/10.1177/23409444221091281
Koryzis, D., Margaris, D., Vassilakis, C., Kotis, K., Spiliotopoulos, D. (2023). Disruptive technologies for parliaments: A literature review. Future Internet, 15(2), 1-21. doi.org/10.3390/fi15020066
Le Blanc, D. (2020). E-Participation: A Quick Overview of Recent Qualitative Trends; DESA Working Paper. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, United Nations: New York. https://www.un.org/sites/un2.un.org/files/2020/08/1597341830.3171.
Lim, Y., Edelenbos, J., Gianoli, A. (2023). Dynamics in the governance of smart cities: Insights from South Korean smart cities. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 27(1), 183-205. doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2022.2063158
Lim, S. B., Yigitcanlar, T. (2022). Participatory governance of smart cities: Insights from e-participation of Putrajaya and Petaling Jaya, Malaysia. Smart Cities, 5(1), 71-89. doi.org/10.3390/smartcities5010005
Makhortykh, M., Urman, A., Wijermars, M. (2022). A story of (non) compliance, bias, and conspiracies: How Google and Yandex represented Smart Voting during the 2021 parliamentary elections in Russia. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review, 3(2), 1-16. doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-94
Maulana, M. M., Suroso, A. I., Nurhadryani, Y., Seminar, K. B. (2023). The Smart Governance Framework and Enterprise System’s Capability for Improving Bio-Business Licensing Services. In Informatics, 10(2), 1-23. doi.org/10.3390/informatics10020053
Maulana, M. M., Suroso, A. I., Nurhadryani, Y., Seminar, K. B. (2025). Smart Governance System’s Design to Monitor the Commitments of Bio-Business Licensing in Indonesia. Information, 16(2), 1-26. doi.org/10.3390/info16020078
Ngudi, D., Astuti, N. (2022). Jurnal: The Importance of Maintaining the Vote of Millennials for Political Parliaments Pass the Parliamentary Threshold in 2024 Election. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Studies, 4(2), 8-15. al-kindipublisher.com/index.php/jhsss/arti.
Oberthür, S., von Homeyer, I., Schewe, L., Moore, B. (2025). Public participation in EU climate governance: the underexploited potential of national energy and climate plans. Journal of European Integration, 47(2), 257-276. doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2025.2460194
Oliveira, C., Garcia, A. C. (2019). Citizens' electronic participation: a systematic review of their challenges and how to overcome them. International Journal of Web Based Communities, 15(2), 123-150. doi.org/10.1504/IJWBC.2019.101042
Parenti, C., Noori, N., Janssen, M. (2022). A Smart Governance diffusion model for blockchain as an anti-corruption tool in Smart Cities. Journal of Smart Cities and Society, 1(1), 71-92. doi.org/10.3233/SCS-210122
Przeybilovicz, E., Cunha, M. A. (2024). Governing in the digital age: The emergence of dynamic smart urban governance modes. Government Information Quarterly, 41(1), 1-14. doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2023.101907
Reynolds, C. J., Hallinan, B. (2024). User-generated accountability: Public participation in algorithmic governance on YouTube. New media & society, 26(9), 5107-5129. doi.org/10.1177/14614448241251791
Ruijer, E., Van Twist, A., Haaker, T., Tartarin, T., Schuurman, N., Melenhorst, M., Meijer, A. (2023). Smart governance toolbox: A systematic literature review. Smart Cities, 6(2), 878-896. doi.org/10.3390/smartcities6020042
Sahamies, K., Haveri, A., Anttiroiko, A. V. (2022). Local governance platforms: Roles and relations of city governments, citizens, and businesses. Administration & Society, 54(9), 1710-1735. DOI: 10.1177/00953997211072531 
Toots, M. (2019). Why E-participation systems fail: The case of Estonia's Osale.ee. Government information quarterly, 36(3), 546-559. doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.02.002
Yin, J., Song, H. (2023). Does the perception of smart governance enhance commercial investments? Evidence from Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, and Hangzhou. Heliyon, 9(8), 1-17. doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19024
 
Translated References into English
Gheiravani, G., Montazeri, M. and Zahedi, S. S. (2024). Presenting the Model of Effective Factors on Smart Governance in the Country. Journal of value creating in Business Management, 4(1), 279-301. [In Persian]
Gholami, H., Mirehei, M., Javid, A. (2022). Explaining the model of smart governance with the approach of popular participation in urban decision making (Case study: Tehran). MJSP, 26(1), 119-139. [In Persian]
Madani, J. (2022). Smart Governance: a New Approach in Realizing Effective Participation and Cooperation of Citizens. Strategy, 31(3), 407-440. [In Persian]
Mirbagheri, S. Abdi, I. (2022). Conceptualization of participatory governance. Islamic Parliament Research Center, 30(11), 1-29. [In Persian]
Mirzaeipour, M. M. Mahmoudi, M. H. (2023). Development of information technologies towards direct democracy. Islamic Parliament Research Center, 31(4), 24-1. [In Persian]
Mohammadi Harouni, F., Abdolhossein Zadeh, M. (2023). Smart Policy-Making: A Novel Approach to Enhancing the Efficiency of the Country's Decision-Making and Legislation System. Islamic Parliament Research Center, Tehran. [In Persian]
Najafi Restaqi, H., Abdolhossein Zadeh, M. (2023). Challenges and Solutions for Achieving Smart Governance in the Country and Policy Recommendations for the Islamic Consultative Assembly. Tehran, Iran: Majlis Research Center. [In Persian]
Nourijani, A., Eslami, H., Afshani, S. A. Dehghan Dehnavi, H. (2023). Presenting the Ideal Model of Digital Governance in the Era of Networked Society. New Media Studies, 9(34), 429-399. [In Persian]
Radadi, M. (2023). Analyzing the issue of hope and the possibilities of its production; with emphasis on the capacities of promoting public participation in the Islamic Consultative Assembly. Islamic Parliament Research Center, 31(12), 1-30. [In Persian]
Yousefi, A., Abdolhamid, M. (2024). The Policy and Governance Observatory as a Facilitator of Smart and Evidence-based Governance. Public Management Researches, 17(66), 33-62 [In Persian]
Zamani, S. (2023). A Comparative Study of Public Participation Methods in the Legislative Process and Recommendations for the Islamic Parliament. Islamic Parliament Research Center, Tehran. [In Persian]