نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استاد علوم سیاسی دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.

2 دکتری علوم سیاسی (مسائل ایران) دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.

چکیده

هدف این پژوهش بررسی روند همگرایی و واگرایی دولت و جامعه در ایران در چهار دهه پس از انقلاب 57 است. برای رسیدن به این منظور، از شرایط دولت و جامعه و متغیرهای مؤثر در تحولات جامعه و دولت در طول روند زمانی مدنظر بحث شده است. دولت و جامعه در ایران، از سال ۵۷ در طول روند فرآیند زمانی، دارای دو دوره بوده است: دوره وحدت و دوره تضاد. پرسش اصلی این است که میان نگاه دولت و جامعه ایرانِ پس از انقلاب، درباره سیاست داخلی و خارجی، چه نسبتی وجود داشته و این نگاه چه تحولی پیدا کرده است. پاسخ این پرسش پس از بررسی وضعیت جامعه و دولت در فرآیند زمانیِ چهار دهه اخیر، این است که در دوره دهه اول انقلاب که آن را دوره وحدت می‌نامیم، براساس عواملی چون خود انقلاب، جنگ و وجود منابع رانتی میان نظام سیاسی و جامعه وحدت و همگرایی وجود داشته است؛ اما در ادامه مسیر، به‌تدریج،  میان این‌دو واگرایی شکل گرفته و در نهایت تضاد به وجود آمده است. عوامل و موئلفه های حرکت به سمت تضاد عبارت‌اند از: نظام بین‌الملل، آگاهی اجتماعی و سیاست‌های داخلی و خارجی، و عوامل حرکت به سمت واگرایی به تفصیل بررسی و آمار نظرسنجی، شرایط واگرائی و حرکت به سمت تضاد را نشان می دهد. در این پژوهش روش تحقیق بر اساس رهیافت پس رویدادی گذشته نگر است که در آن علت و معلول پس از وقوع بررسی می شوند، و از معلول به علت ها و متغیرهای آن پی می بریم.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Society and the Government of the Islamic Republic from Unity to Conflict

نویسندگان [English]

  • Hamid Ahmadi 1
  • Abbas Ashrafi 2

1 Professor, Department of Political Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

2 PhD, Department of Political Science (Iranian Issues), University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

چکیده [English]

Introduction
In the contemporary era, Iran society has not had stable and continuous conditions in terms of stability between the government and the society, and after the establishment of a government with new conditions, after a short period of time, various factors, including social dissatisfaction and potential and power in the society, it has changed the situation.
Regarding the new government formed in 1979 and in the last four decades in Iran, not much research has been done to examine the conditions of the society and government and the path of social revolutions as well as how the government responds to social demands. Therefore, research in this field seems necessary. In the current research, considering this necessity, the conditions of the society and the government in Iran in the last four decades are examined. For this purpose, the revolution 0f 1979 has been taken as a point of time and the factors of unity in the early years of the revolution have been discussed. Then, according to the divergence between the government and the society in the following periods, the factors of divergence have been investigated.
Material and methods
 During the time period in question, one of these two elements has moved towards conservatism and stability, preferring the existing conditions, while the other, on the contrary, has been interested in dynamism and entering the new world. This basis of transformation and stagnation will be analyzed and examined in the framework of the dialectic theory of understanding: dialectic is a process based on which the phenomenon always has transformation and dynamics. There is a condition in the current phenomenon that changes over time, and this change can include awareness. In one place, the processes continue to change and evolve and in another place, they go to stop and stand still.
Results and discussion
In the present study, the research method is based on the retrospective post-event approach (E-Post facto) in which the cause and affect are investigated after the occurrence. In other words, we understand its causes and variables from the effect.
The purpose of this research is to investigate the convergence and divergence of government and society in Iran in the last four decades. To achieve this purpose, the conditions of the government and society and the effective variables in the evolution of the society and the government during the considered time process have been discussed. The government and society in Iran have had two periods since 1979 until now: The period of unity and the period of conflict. The most important factor in this context is time, and during the time process, it is from the beginning of the new turning point that it is possible to analyze and explain the initial entanglement of the government and society in relation to the conditions, and based on the time process and the formation of developments during this over time and based on the accumulation of social issues and demands and the government failure to resolve them, the situation between the society and the government tended to diverge
The main question is, what was the relationship between the view of Iranian government and society after the revolution, regarding domestic and foreign policy, and how has this view changed. The answer to this question after examining the state of society and the government in the last four decades, is that in the early period of the revolution, which we call the period of unity, based on factors such as the revolution itself, as well as the war and the existence of rent resources, between the political system and the society. There has been unity and convergence; But along the way, gradually, a divergence between these two was formed and finally a conflict has emerged. This contradiction has been proven by referring to valid survey statistics and the example of these statistics can be referred to base on people’s opinion about trust in political elites conducted by the Iranian student’s opinion survey center 2005.
Conclusion
In this survey, the overall level of trust in the officials’ is 21%, which is an important indicator in the difference between the society and government. On the other hand, based on the time process and issues formed after this consultation, the situation has intensified the divergence process. One of the important factors and signs in the dynamics of society can be considered its support for freedom, as well as the media, which are the main support of freedom. Therefore, the indicator of supporting the freedom of the media in the prevailing culture and conditions of a society can be considered as a sign of the dynamism and transformation of that society. According to the survey research of the opinion polling center, in 2005, students agreed with four items based on freedom and minimal government interference in media, with a high percentage of them agreeing with this item
Therefore, the most important factors and determinants that moved the situation between the society and the government towards divergence are the international system, social awareness and internal and external policies, which have been examined in detail.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Government
  • Society
  • Conflict
  • Revolution
  • Unity
فارسی
احمدی، حمید (۱۳۹۰). بنیادهای هویت ملی ایرانی، تهران: انتشارات پژوهشکده علوم انسانی.
ایسپا (۱۳۸۵). پیمایش ملی فرهنگ سیاسی مردم ایران: مرکز افکارسنجی دانشجویان ایران.
ایسپا (۱۳۹۷). پیمایش ملی فرهنگ سیاسی مردم ایران: مرکز افکارسنجی دانشجویان ایران.
آرنت، هانا (۱۳۸۱). انقلاب، ترجمه عزت الله فولادوند، تهران: انتشارات خوارزمی.
آرنت، هانا (۱۳۹۴). خشونت و اندیشههایی درباره سیاست و انقلاب، ترجمه عزت الله فولادوند، تهران: انتشارات خوارزمی.
بشیریه، حسین (۱۳۹۵). موانع توسعه در ایران، تهران: گام نو.
پیرسون، پل (۱۳۹۳). سیاست در بستر زمان ، ترجمه محمد فاضلی، تهران: نشر نی.
دوتوکویل،  الکسی (۱۳۸۵).  انقلاب فرانسه،  ترجمه محسن ثلاثی، تهران: انتشارات مروارید.
رمضانی، روح الله (۱۳۹۹). تاریخ سیاست خارجی ایران، ترجمه اسلامی و پزشکیان، تهران: نی.
ستاری، سجاد (۱۴۰۲). گفتارهای نو در جامعه‌شناسی سیاسی، تهران: دانشگاه تهران.
ستاری، سجاد (۱۳۹۴). تولد زیست فرهنگ در جهان در حال شدن، فصلنامه سیاست، دوره چهل و پنجم ، شماره سه.
ستاری، سجاد (۱۴۰۱). قدرت و وضعیت استثنا جبری در ایران، دولت پژوهی، دوره هشتم، شماره سی و یکم.
سرمد، زهره (۱۳۹۲). روش های تحقیق در علوم رفتاری، تهران: نشر آگاه.
سن، آمارتیا (۱۳۹۴). توسعه یعنی آزادی، ترجمه محمدسعید نوری نائینی، تهران: نشر نی.
کار، ادوارد هلت(۱۳۹۶). تاریخ چیست، ترجمه حسن کامشاد، تهران: خوارزمی.
گیدنز، آنتونی (۱۳۹۶). ساخت جامعه، ترجمه اکبر احمدی، تهران: علم.
موسوی ، سعید (۱۳۹۹). داستان توسعه در ایران، دفتر دوم، تهران: نشر لوح فکر.
مارکوزه، هربرت(۱۳۹۷). خرد و انقلاب، ترجمه محسن ثلاثی، تهران: ثالث.
               مزاروش، ایستوان.. (۱۳۹۶). دیالکتیک برای قرن جدید، مترجمان کمال خالق پناه و.... ، تهران: نشر اختران.
هابرماس، یورگن (۱۳۹۹). دگرگونی ساختاری حوزه عمومی، ترجمه جمال محمدی، تهران: افکار.
هابرماس، یورگن (۱۳۹۹). نظریه کنش ارتباطی، ترجمه کمال پولادی، تهران: مرکز.
هگل، گئورگ ویلهلم فریدریش (۱۳۸۵). عقل در تاریخ، ترجمه دکتر حمید عنایت، تهران:  شفیعی.
هولاب، رابرت (۱۳۹۶). یورگن هابرماس، نقد در حوزه عمومی،ترجمه حسین بشیریه، تهران: نشر نی.
والتس، کنث (۱۳۹۴). نظریه سیاست بینالملل، ترجمه روح‌الله طالبی آرانی، تهران: نشر مخاطب.
 
References
Ramezani, Rouhollah(1975). Iran s Foreign Policy 1941-1973: University Press of Virginia.
Ross, Edward Alsworth (1901). Social Control , A Control of the Foundations of Order , New York : Macmillan.
 
Translated References into English
Ahmadi, Hamid (2011). Foundations of Iranian National Identity, Tehran: Humanities Research Institute publications, [In Persian].
ISPA (2006). National Survey of Political Culture of the Iranian People, Iranian Student Opinion Polling Center.
ISPA (2018). National Survey of Political Culture of the Iranian People, Iranian Student Opinion Polling Center.
Arendt, Hannah. (2006 ). The Revolution, Translators: fooladvand, ezatollah,  Tehran: kharazmi Publications, [In Persian].
Arendt, Hannah. (2015 ). Violence and the Thought of  Revolution, Translator: fooladvand, ezatollah,  Tehran: kharazmi Publications, [In Persian].
bashireyh, hosaien (2016 ). Obstacles to development in Iran, Tehran: gam nov publications, [In Persian].
Pierson, Paul. (2006 ). Politics in Time, Translator: Fazeli, Mohamad, Tehran: ney Publications, [In Persian].
Tocqueville, Alexis (2007 ). The old regime and the French revolution, Translator:Salasi,  mohsen,  Tehran: morvarid publications, [In Persian].
Ramazani, Rouhollah (2021). The Foreign Policy of Iran, Tehran: ney publications, [In Persian].
Sattari, Sjajad (2023). New Discourses in Political Sociology, Tehran: University of Tehran  publications, [In Persuan].
Sattari, Sjajad (2015). The Birth of Bioculture in a Changing World, The State Studies , Vol 45. Isse 3, [In Persuan].
Sattari, Sjajad (2022). Power and Involuntary State of Exception in Iran, The State Studies , Vol 8. Isse 31, [In Persuan].
Sarmad, Zoreh (2013). Research Methods in Bemavioral Sciences, Tehran: aghah publications, [In Persuan].
Sen, Amartya. (2015 ). Develipment as Freedem, Translator: Noori naeeni, Mohamad saeed,  Tehran: ney Publications, [In Persian].
 
Carr, E. H. (2017 ). What is History, Translator: kamshad, hasan, Tehran: kharazmi Publications, [In Persian].
Giddens, Anthony. (2017 ). The Constitution of Society , Translator: Ahmadi, Akbar,  Tehran: elm Publications, [In Persian].
Mousavi, Saeed (2021). The Story of Development in Iran, Tehran: lovhe fekr Publications, [In Persian].
Herbert, Marcuse. (2018 ). Reason and Revolution , Translator: Salasi, Mohsen,  Tehran: Sales Publications, [In Persian].
Mazarosh, Estvan. (2017 ). Dialectics for the new century , Translator: khlaeghpanah, Kamal,  Tehran: akhtaran Publications, [In Persian].
Habermas, Jurgen. (2020 ). The Stractual Transformation of the Public Sphere , Translator: mohamadi, Jamal,  Tehran: Afkar Publications, [In Persian].
 Habermas, Jurgen. (2020 ). The Theory of Communicative Action , Translator: Poladi, Kamal,  Tehran: Markaz Publications, [In Persian].
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. (2006 ). Reason in History, Translator: Enaiat, Hamid,  Tehran: shafeie Publications, [In Persian].
Holub, Robert. (2017 ). Jurgen Habermas: Critic in the Public Shere, Translator: Bashiriyh, hosaein,  Tehran: ney Publications, [In Persian].
Valtes, Kenet. (2015 ). International Political Theory, Translator: Talebi arani, Rouhollah,  Tehran: Mokhtab Publications, [In Persian].