نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

دکتری مدیریت دولتی دانشگاه سمنان، سمنان، ایران.

چکیده

با توجه به اینکه نظام حکمرانی نقش مهمی در تأمین حق سلامت آحاد ملت ایران دارد، عبرت از تجربیات ملی و بین­المللی در این زمینه، از اهمیت ویژه­ای برخوردار است. مسئله پژوهش آن است که چگونه نظام سیاست­گذاری کشور برای مقابله با بحران بیماری­های همه­گیر در آینده خود را تجهیز نماید. از این رو، هدف این پژوهش شناسایی ابعاد تجربه ملی ایران در مقابله با بیماری همه­گیر کرونا به منظور شناسایی اصول و ابعاد خط­مشی­های بهینه برای آمادگی مقابله با سایر بیماری­های نوظهور و همه­گیری­های دیگر در آینده است. مطالعه حاضر با رویکرد کیفی و به روش تحلیل مضمون و با استفاده از مصاحبه­های نیمه­ ساختاریافته و به روش گلوله برفی با 16 نفر از خبرگان این حوزه انجام شد. نتایج شامل 218 مضمون اولیه، 24 مضمون فرعی و 6 مضمون اصلی شامل سیاست‌­های کاهش تماس اجتماعی، سیاست‌های حفظ تماس اجتماعی، سیاست­های حمایت عمومی و نهایتاً سیاست­های نظام حکمرانی است. همچنین مشخص گردید که با توجه به تجربه گذشته و شرایط اقتصادی­ _ اجتماعی ایران، سیاست بهینه برای مقابله و آمادگی در آینده، دو مرحله اصلی دارد: اول، مرحله اقدام ضربتی با تعطیلی فراگیر کوتاه‌مدت سه تا چهار هفته ­ای به نحوی که تعداد بیماران در سطح جامعه به شدت کاهش یابد (با توجه به دوره بیماری) و به نقطه تعادلی جدید و دلخواه با مرگ و میر محدود دست یابد. دوم، مرحله بازگشت تدریجی به فعالیت‌­های اجتماعی-اقتصادی با کنترل عدد بازتولید در نزدیکی یک.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Optimal Policy Making in The Face of Crisis Epidemic Diseases: A Bridge from The Past to The Future

نویسنده [English]

  • Seyed Mohammad Mehdi Baki Hashemi

Ph.D., Department of Public Administration, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran.

چکیده [English]

Introduction
The presence of the Covid-19 virus was first reported in December 2018 in Wuhan, China, and then it spread to other countries in the world. Iran also officially announced on February 30, 2018 that this virus has entered the country. Following this issue, a series of different policies were used to provide the ground to control and contain the disease. Due to the fact that the virus was unknown, the way governments dealt with it was different, but the problem that made Iran's conditions more difficult to deal with the virus was the widespread sanctions, especially in the field of raw materials, medicine and medical equipment. The epidemic of corona disease and its extraordinary spread caused wide challenges and problems in health, economic, social, security, etc. fields. Therefore, taking strategic and timely decisions to control the virus and its consequences became very important. But now that the world is in the post-coronavirus era, learning from the governance methods in dealing with and confronting governments with the corona virus in the past can provide great political lessons for the necessary preparation to deal with possible epidemics. Provide the lowest cost and the highest benefit in the future. Therefore, in order to learn from the bitter experience of the past and to create a bridge from the past, in order to make the future measures more transparent, in order to answer these questions: 1) What policies does the Iranian government have in view of the corona virus epidemic? What could be done to control the spread of the epidemic with relatively low economic cost and high public benefit? 2) What optimal policy should the Iranian government adopt in the event of an epidemic disease crisis? The research was designed and implemented. Therefore, the aim of the research is to gather the opinions of experts and experts regarding the most effective policy measures in facing the Corona epidemic in order to derive a transparent, coherent and effective policy to ensure the readiness of the country's governance system to deal with similar critical conditions in the future, so that the country is able to recover with the least damage. To be resilient and bear such emergency situations. By examining the research conducted in the field of the nature of the Corona problem as a malignant problem compared to the manageable problems and the development of its strategic principles, it was determined that this issue has a research gap in the scientific-research literature of the country, also in the field of Corona policy making and its foundations. Considering the novelty of this topic, there are many research shortcomings. Therefore, this research seeks to fill these research gaps.
Materials and Methods
The current research is among the applied researches in terms of its purpose and it was done with a qualitative approach. In the qualitative stage, thematic analysis method (or theme analysis) has been used to identify the categories of the research.
 In order to identify the policies and policies adopted during the Corona epidemic in Iran in order to identify and formulate optimal policies, while using the method of library studies and the use of scientific-research documents and documents, articles, reference books and domestic and foreign sources; Additional data of the research has been collected by field method and semi-structured interviews. Triangulation method was used to check research tools. The selection criteria of people have been having expertise, experience or published works in the field of the research subject and also having a management experience of more than 10 years, which formed the possible community for the researcher to refer to, who is trying to answer the following questions.
1) Considering the epidemic of corona disease, what policies could the Iranian government implement to control the spread of the epidemic with relatively low economic cost and high public benefit?
2) In the event of an epidemic crisis, what optimal policy should the Iranian government adopt?
Finally, the participants with the "snowball sampling method" and carefully refer to the first circle available; were determined and interviewed until reaching the theoretical saturation point; It continued with 16 experts.
Results and Discussion
The results include 218 primary themes, 24 sub-themes and 6 main themes which include social contact reduction policies, social contact maintenance policies, public support policies and finally governance system policies. It was also found that according to the past experience and the economic and social conditions of Iran, the optimal policy to deal with and prepare for the future has two main stages: First, the stage of strike action with a short-term comprehensive shutdown of three to four weeks to A way that the number of patients at the community level is drastically reduced (according to the course of the disease) and a new and desired equilibrium point is reached with limited mortality. Second, the stage of gradual return to social and economic activities by controlling the reproduction number near one. Finally, research and executive proposals were presented.
Conclusion
The success of the policy depends on the minimization of social interactions in the first stage so that people reduce their interactions in closed spaces to near zero and necessary activities are carried out using personal protective equipment such as masks and gloves. Of course, the necessity of accompanying citizens is continuous communication, transparency in informing the real and complete statistics of patients and deaths, separated by different regions. Although it may seem that the peace of the society depends on making the situation less risky, the reality is that the success of the short-term strike policy depends on the full cooperation of the citizens, which also depends on their accurate knowledge of the risk of disease in different places and times. Different are tied. After passing the first stage, the policy makers can carefully rely on the information and knowledge that is determined daily by researchers and epidemiologists about the characteristics of the disease to monitor the number of reproduction and take prudent measures and control it. In the vicinity and under the number of people, they are engaged. And by determining different and diverse support packages for the vulnerable and at-risk groups, they will help to maintain social cohesion and mobilize the society to overcome the epidemic wave.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Optimal Policy Making
  • Epidemic
  • Disease
  • Health System
  • Corona
  • Crisis
فارسی
اخوان کاظمی، بهرام و فروتن، فاطمه. (1402)کرونا، مخاطره در کار، بازاندیشی در نقش دولت. دولت پژوهی،9(34):241-272 . Doi: 10.22054/TSSQ.2023.70408.1341
الوند، مرضیه سادات و قاسمی، ابوالفضل. (1400). اصول راهبردی سیاست‌گذاری مواجهه با کرونا به مثابه مسئله بدخیم سیاستی، پژوهش­های راهبردی سلامت، (37)10، 268-303.
تاج‌بخش، غلامرضا؛ شیرعلی، اسماعیل و حسینی، محمدرضا. (1399). آسیب‌شناسی داده بنیاد حکمرانی پاندمی کرونا در ایران. راهبرد، (97)29.
جعفری، علی؛ شعبانزاده، ایمان؛ خلیلی، علی؛ فولادی مقدم، شهاب­الدین و بر سیاه، وحید. (1401). ارزیابی حمایت­های اجتماعی در بحران کرونا؛ مرور تجارب کشورهای منتخب. مرکز پژوهش­های مجلس شورای اسلامی، تهران: شماره مسلسل 18255.
حبیب نژاد، سید احمد و عامری، زهرا. (1399). نظام مداخلات حمایتی دولت از گروه‌های آسیب‌پذیر در وضعیت‌های بحرانی و اضطراری. حقوق اسلامی، سال 17، شماره 64.
خانی، آرش بیداله. (1399). ساخت بندی و افتراق حوزه پولیتیک از پالسی: تایوان و سازوکارهای کنترل و مدیریت بحران پاندمی بیماری کووید 19. پژوهش­های راهبردی سیاست، (33)9: 1-33.
رفیعیان، مجتبی؛ مطهری، زینب السادات (1391). طراحی مدلی برای مطالعه رویکرد مدیریت ریسک بحران اجتماع‌محور مطالعه موردی طرح دوام. مدیریت بحران، 1(1). 5-12.
فضلی، رز و علیحیدری، محسن. (1399). کرونا و مسئله دفاع از امر غیرقابل دفاع؛ ضرورت حفظ و همراهی با نهاد دولت در وضعیت پاندمی از منظر آلن بدیو. دولت پژوهی، (22)6: 63-105. Doi: 10.22054/tssq.2021.53939.947         
شمسی، محسن. (1399). سواد بهداشتی و شیوع کرونا. فصلنامه پایش، 19(2).
کمالی، یحیی؛ جلا میرزایی (1396). مقایسه ساختار مدیری. بحران در ایران، ژاپن، هند و ترکیه. مطالعات راهبردی سیاست‌گذاری عمومی، 7(25)، 245-269.
کریمی مله، علی و پارسا، ندا. (1398). سیاست‌گذاری هویت ملی و الزامات راهبردی آن برای ایران. مطالعات ملی، سال 20، شماره 1.
محمدصادقی، تاج؛ رئیسی، لیلا و راعی، مسعود. (1401). اتحادیه اروپا و بحران کرونا ویروس: پیامدها و واکنش­ها. آمایش سیاسی فضا، دوره 4، شماره2: 126-139.
نصیری حامد، رضا. (1399). بحران کرونا به مثابه مجالی برای بازاندیشی در وضعیت سیاسی اکنون. پژوهشنامه علوم سیاسی، سال 15، شماره2.
واعظی، هما؛ غفاری گیلانده، عطا؛ محمدی، علیرضا (1402). شناسایی چهارچوب نظری رویکردهای ساختاری و نهادی مدیریت بحران اجتماع­محور با استفاده از روش فراترکیب. جغرافیا و پایداری محیط، 13(3)، 105-137.
هرینگتن، پیتر. (1399). همه­گیری­های جهانی به مثابه مسائل پیچیده انطباقی، ترجمه فاطمه تبرزاده، مرکز توانمندسازی حاکمیت و جامعه، کد مقاله: 5929، قابل‌دسترس در:
 
References
 
AbuShariah, H. I. I. (2022). The Jordanian Government Public Policy in Facing the Corona Virus (COVID 19). Jordanian Journal of Law and Political Science, Volume 14, No. 1.  https://doi.org/10.35682/jjlps.v14i1.331
Billah, M. A., Miah, M. M., & Khan, M. N. (2020). Reproductive number of coronavirus: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on global level evidence. PloS one, 15(11), e0242128.doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242128.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
Busso, M., Camacho, J., Messina, J., & Montenegro, G. (2021). Social protection and informality in Latin America during the COVID-19 pandemic. PloS one, 16(11), e0259050.
Danaee­Fard, H., Azar, A., & Shirzadi, M. (2011). A framework for identifying the competencies of national policy makers (representatives of the legislative assembly). Majlis and Strategy, 19(70), 5-35. [In Persian].
Davidoff, P. (1965). Advocacy and pluralism in planning. Journal of the American Institute of planners, 31(4), 331-338. Doi: 10.1002/9781119084679.ch21.
Ferrera, M., & Burelli, C. (2019). Cross national solidarity and political sustainability in the EU after the Crisis. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 57(1), 94-110.
Ferrier, N., & Haque, C. E. (2003). Hazards risk assessment methodology for emergency managers: A standardized framework for application. Natural hazards, 28, 271-290. Doi: 10.1023/ A:1022986226340.
Fazli, R., & Aliheidari, M. (2019). Corona and the problem of defending the indefensible; the necessity of maintaining and accompanying the government institution in the pandemic situation from Alain Badiou's point of view. Government research, (22)6, 63-105. [In Persian].
          Doi: 10.22054/tssq.2021.53939.947
Gostic, K. M., McGough, L., Baskerville, E. B., Abbott, S., Joshi, K., Tedijanto, C. ... & Cobey, S. (2020). Practical considerations for measuring the effective reproductive number, R t. PLoS computational biology, 16(12), e1008409.
Healey, P., & Healey, P. (1997). Strategies, processes and plans. Collaborative Planning: shaping places in fragmented societies, 243-283.
Osinowo, G. A. (2021). Private Sector in Public Policy An Analysis of Private Sector Involvement in Corona Virus Testing. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 9(12), 103-117. DOI: 10.4236/jss.2021.912009
Samutereko, E. Z. (2021). A critical Analysis of social distancing as a policy to combat the Spread of Corona Virus in Zimbabwe. Technium Soc. Sci. J., 20, 782.
Waris, A. (2023). Societal Trust, Transparency and Accountability in Fiscal Policy During National Emergencies: A Reflection on the Unfolding Global Corona Virus Pandemic in Africa. The African Review, 50(4), 513-526. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/1821889x-bja10058
 
Translated References into English
 
 Akhavan Kazemi, B., & Forootan, F. (2023). Corona, Risk at Work,
                    Rethinking in the Role of State. State Studies, 9(34), 241-272.
                    Doi: 10.22054/TSSQ.2023.70408.1341. [In Persian].
Alvand, M. S., & Ghasemi, A. (2021). Strategy Principles of Policy Making in the Confront with Corona as a Malignant Policy Problem. Quarterly of Political Strategic Studies, 37(10). DOI: 10.22054/QPSS.2021.56247.2692 [In Persian].
Danaee­Fard, H., Azar, A., & Shirzadi, M. (2011). A framework for identifying the competencies of national policy makers (representatives of the legislative assembly). Majlis and Strategy, 19(70), 5-35. [In Persian].
Fazli, R., & Aliheidari, M. (2019). Corona and the problem of defending the indefensible; the necessity of maintaining and accompanying the government institution in the pandemic situation from Alain Badiou's point of view. Government research, (22)6, 63-105. [In Persian].
          Doi: 10.22054/tssq.2021.53939.947
Ghasemi, H., & Adib, F. (1400). Research reference. Tehran: Andisheh Ara Publications. [In Persian].
Habibnejad, S. A. & Ameri, Z. (2019). The government's support intervention system for vulnerable groups in critical and emergency situations. Islamic law. Year 17, No. 64. [In Persian].
Jafari, A., Shabanzadeh, I., Khalili, A., Fuladi Moghadam, S.h., & Barsiah, V. (1401). Evaluation of social support in the corona crisis; reviewing the experiences of selected countries. Islamic Council Research Center. Tehran. Number 18255 [In Persian].
Kamali, Y., & Mirzaei, J. (2017). Comparison of management structure. Crisis in Iran, Japan, India and Türkiye. Strategic Studies Quarterly of Public Policy, 7(25), 245-269. [In Persian].
Karimi Melle, A. & Parsa, N. (2018). National identity politicization and its strategic requirements for Iran. National studies. Year 20, Number 1 [In Persian].
Khani, A. (2019). Structuring and distinguishing the field of politics from politics: Taiwan and the control and management mechanisms of the pandemic crisis of the Covid-19 disease. Strategic Policy Research Quarterly, (33) 9, 1-33 [In Persian].
Madani Borujeni, S.A., & Nasr, A.R. (2009). Triangulation: A strategy for innovating in educational researches. Journal of Educational Innovations (JEI), 8(2), 53-74. [In Persian].
Rafiian, M., & Motahari, Z. A. (2012). Designing a model for studying the community-based crisis risk management approach: a case study of the Durability Project. Quarterly Journal of Crisis Management, 1(1). 5-12. [In Persian].
Sadeghi, T., Raisi, L., & Raii, M. (2022). The European Union and the Corona virus: Consequences and Reactions. Political Organizing of Space, 4(2), 126-139. [In Persian].
Shamsi, M. (2019). Health literacy and the spread of Corona. Paish Quarterly. Year 19. Number 2. [In Persian].
Tajbakhsh, G., Shirali, E., & Hosseini, M. (2020). Pathology of the Corona Pandemic Governance in Iran (A Grounded Theory). Strategy, 29(4), 97-129. [In Persian].
Vaezi, H., Ghafari Gilandeh, A., & Mohammadi, A. (2023). Identifying the Theoretical Framework of Structural and Institutional Approaches to Community-Based Disaster Management using the Meta-Synthesis Method. Geography and Environmental Sustainability, 13 (3), 105-137. DOI: 10.22126/GES.2023.9094.2656. [In Persian].
International Conference on Management, Accounting and Economic Development. [In Persian].