نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشیار حقوق عمومی دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران

2 کارشناسی ارشد حقوق عموم دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران

چکیده

ملت‌سازی فرایند ساخت یا ترمیم ملت است و موضوع آن، جامعه انسانی است که می‌خواهند با یکدیگر ما شدن را ذیل مفهوم ملت تجربه کنند. پروسه پایدار ساخت ‌ملت در جامعه متنوع کاری دشوار است؛ در اغلب ملت‌سازی‌ها بدون نظر داشتن به تنوعات فرهنگی در جامعه، به امر فرهنگی یکی از گروه‌ها که به‌خودی‌خود سیاسی نیست متوسل شده و امر فرهنگی را از فرهنگ بودگی خارج می‌کنند و همچون ابزار سیاسی مورد استفاده قرار می‌دهند. حال برخی معتقدند تأکید بر زبان یا فرهنگ اکثریت در استحکام فرا گرد ملت امری ضروری است. اما روند ملت‌سازی سوئیس خود دلیلی بر رد این ادعاست که زبان و فرهنگ اکثریت مؤلفه‌ کافی برای ساخت ملت نیست؛ بلکه عواملی چون عدالت ‌اجتماعی، درک و احترام متقابل نسبت به تنوعات فرهنگی و زبانی نیز می‌تواند ملتی پایدار بسازد. پژوهش حاضر با رویکردی حقوقی، تاریخی و تفسیری از متون گردآوری‌شده به شیوه‌ کتابخانه‌ای، درصدد پاسخ به این سؤال است که آیا در روند ملت‌سازی سوئیس امر فرهنگی از امر سیاسی تفکیک شده است؟ با نگاهی به فرا گرد ملت‌سازی آن درمی‌یابیم مرز این دو امر در کنار هم درست ترسیم شده است و امر فرهنگی گروه اکثریت ذیل امر سیاسی قرار ندارد؛ بلکه امر سیاسی همچون فدرالیسم، جمهوری‌خواهی و دموکراسی ‌مستقیم ذیل امر فرهنگی که گویای تکثر جامعه است قرار دارد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Distinguishability of the Cultural from the Political in the Process of Nation-Building in Switzerland

نویسندگان [English]

  • Ali Akbar Gorji Azandaryani 1
  • Shahriar Hoseini 2

1 Associate Professor, Department of Public Law, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

2 M.A, Department of Public Law, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

چکیده [English]

Extended Abstract
Introduction
Ethnic and cultural diversity has always been a fundamental aspect of social reality across the world. However, these diversities become particularly significant when they intersect with the process of nation-building. Diversity can either contribute to national stability or ignite the flames of civil war. In the early stages of nation-building, states often adopted culturally homogeneous policies, seeking to resolve diversity through ethnic and cultural assimilation in the name of national unity and integration. They perceived ethnic and cultural diversity as an obstacle to the formation of a nation–state. In ethnically and linguistically diverse societies, cultural issues must be addressed in a pluralistic manner, reflecting the society’s inherent characteristics. Yet, during the nation-building process, cultural matters are sometimes narrowly defined to accelerate the process and secure political legitimacy, with their scope limited to the cultural components of the majority. In such cases, because the driving force behind nation-building relies heavily on the support of the majority, cultural matters become subsumed under political concerns. As a result, culture is often overshadowed by the hegemony of power, leading to the marginalization or erasure of minority cultures. In this model of nation-building, leaders attempt to maintain the internal cohesion of the group they claim to represent by politicizing cultural matters. To advance their political goals, they may alter or even fabricate cultural markers, ultimately subordinating culture to politics. Drawing a clear boundary to prevent cultural matters from being overshadowed by political agendas during nation-building is an extremely difficult and complex task. The process of nation-building in Switzerland since the early 19th century has puzzled researchers, raising the question of how a country with such cultural and linguistic diversity managed to survive at the heart of Europe, surrounded by more homogeneous nation-building efforts. For those who view linguistic and cultural homogeneity as essential to nation-building, Switzerland represents a significant anomaly. Given Switzerland’s linguistic, cultural, and religious diversity, the question arises as to what path its nation-building process has taken to accommodate these differences without allowing one language or culture to dominate. Has the cultural dimension been separated from the political in the formation of the Swiss nation? What constitutes the identity of the Swiss nation? Considering its internal diversity, should Switzerland be considered as a single-nation or a multi-nation state?
Materials and Methods
The present study adopted a legal, historical, and interpretive approach to explore the complexities of nation-building in Switzerland. It relied on a collection of texts obtained through library research.
Results and Discussion
First, the study examined the historical development of the concept of nation, categorizing nation-building processes as either democratic or non-democratic—in relation to the function of cultural matters. In democratic nation-building, efforts are made to define ethnic, linguistic, and religious diversities alongside one another. In contrast, non-democratic nation-building tends to subsume cultural issues under political matters, often resulting in conflicts among various ethnic, cultural, and religious pluralities. This approach frequently leads to the marginalization of minority rights. While non-democratic nation-building may yield short-term success, it ultimately fails to foster long-term political stability and social cohesion. Instead, it leads to the construction of a highly fragile nation, one that is somewhat incompatible with the ideals of democracy.
Non-democratic nation-building typically involves the strategic selection of specific segments of the population—usually those belonging to the ethnic or linguistic majority—for the purpose of identity construction. From a scholarly perspective, Switzerland’s nation-building process can be analyzed through three main theoretical frameworks: the liberal–multinational model, the postnational–liberal model, and the liberal–nationalist or single-nation theory. Interestingly, despite their differing viewpoints, proponents of all three theories often cite Switzerland as a distinctive and exemplary case. However, according to the findings of this study, Switzerland’s experience does not align with traditional nation-building processes based on objective criteria such as shared language, culture, or religion. In Switzerland, the political is defined by the cultural rather than the other way around. Therefore, the Swiss nation-building process cannot be reduced to a shared or dominant language, race, culture, or religion. Instead, it reflects a more subjective conception of nationhood rooted in self-awareness. Throughout Switzerland’s nation-building journey, cultural matters were neither sacrificed nor politicized. The formation of the nation process was never monopolized by a privileged class with specific ethnic, linguistic, or religious concepts. On the contrary, the Swiss elites explicitly framed nation-building as a non-ethnic endeavor, consistently acknowledging and incorporating the country’s pluralism into every stage of defining the political.
Conclusion
The Swiss nation is the product of a classical process, one that did not involve the state apparatus, political parties, or individual will—


unlike most nation-building projects. In other words, most nation-building processes follow a top-down approach where the cultural characteristics of the majority group are treated as political instruments. However, in the Swiss case, cultural aspects such as ethnicity, language, or religion were not used as political instruments by the state to satisfy the majority or to forcibly retain minorities. The findings indicated that Switzerland’s nation-building process developed from the bottom up, following a democratic path. Therefore, the classical understanding of Swiss national identity is, to some extent, a political understanding based on shared conception of republicanism, federalism, direct democracy, and neutrality. Importantly, these political matters are not rooted in the cultural matters of any majority ethnic group. However, this does not mean that cultural factors were absent in shaping national identity or completing the nation-building process in Switzerland. On the contrary, both cultural and political elements played a role. The key lies in how the boundaries between them were drawn, ensuring that neither was sacrificed for the sake of the other. As a result, Swiss national identity is two-dimensional. At the cantonal and local levels, there are shared ethnic and cultural elements, but when the Swiss nation is considered as a whole, there is a political and neutral understanding of linguistic, ethnic, and religious diversity. This suggests that nationhood does not require a uniform or homogeneous conception of the elements involved in the nation-building process. In conclusion, the democratic nation-building process defines the political under the cultural, accepting and incorporating existing differences within society. Though this process takes time, it leads to the creation of a stable and enduring nation and national identity.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Nation-building
  • The cultural
  • The political
  • Multicultural nation-building
  • Multilingualism
  • Switzerland
فارسی
احمدی، عبدالوهاب (1396)، ملت، حس ملی، ناسیونالیم، تهران: نشر آگه.
اوزکریملی، اوموت (1398)، آخرین بحث‌ها در مورد ناسیونالیسم یک بررسی انتقادی، ترجمه طاهر اصغرپور، تهران، نشر نگاه معاصر.
پورعزت،علی‌اصغر، طاهری‌عطار،غزاله (1389)،کاربست حکمرانی خوب برای ملت‌سازی در پرتو مطالعات میان‌رشته‌ای، مطالعات میان‌رشته‌ای در علوم انسانی، دوره سوم، شماره1، زمستان ، صص193-173
پورعزت،علی‌اصغر،طاهری‌عطار،غزاله،سعدآبادی،علی‌اصغر(1391)، راهبری ملت‌سازی پایدار مبتنی بر عدالت اجتماعی، تحقیقات سیاسی و بین‌المللی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد شهرضا شماره یازدهم - تابستان، صص 22 – 1
رحمان زاده هروی، محمد، (1393)، نژاد، قوم و ملت در ایران، تهران، انتشارات آمه.
زرگر، افشین (1389)، مدل‌های دولت-ملت‌سازی؛ از مدل اروپایی تا مدل اوراسیایی، علوم سیاسی، سال چهارم، شماره هفتم، 97-160
سیاسی، علیرضا. (1387). گزارش یک زندگی. تهران: اختران.
طاهری‌عطار،غزاله (1392)، طراحی و تبیین الگوی ملت‌سازی پایدار، پژوهش‌های راهبردی سیاست، سال دوم، شماره 7، زمستان (شماره پیاپی 37)
کیملیکا، ویل (1398)، شهروندی چند فرهنگی نظریه‌ای لیبرالی در باب حقوق اقلیت‌ها، مترجم ابراهیم اسکافی، تهران، انتشارات شیرازه.
کریمی، علی (1397)، درآمدی بر جامعه‌شناسی تنوع قومی مسائل و نظریه‌ها، تهران، انتشارات سمت.
کوئن، بروس (1393)، مبانی جامعه‌شناسی، ترجمه و اقتباس غلامعباس توسلی و رضا فاضلی، تهران، انتشارات سمت.
گرجی ازندریانی، علی‌اکبر (1396)، مبانی حقوق عمومی، تهران، انتشارات جنگل.
نواصری، عبدالرضا (1400)، ناسیونالیسم نژادی در تاریخ معاصر ایران، تهران، انتشارات گام نو.
 
References
Ahmadi, Abdul Wahhab, (2018) Nation, National sense, Nationalism, Tehran, agah, (In Persian)
BRASS, P. (1991) Ethnicity and Nationalism. Theory and Comparison. London: Sage.
Breton, R. (1988) From ethnic to civic nationalism. English Canada and Quebec, Ethnic and Racial Studies, 11(1), pp. 85-102.
Chollet, A. (2011). Switzerland as a “fractured nation.” Nations and Nationalism, 17(4), 738–755
Cronin , C . ( 2003 ) .Democracy and Collective Identity : In Defence of Constitutional Patriotism, European Journal of Philosophy 11 (1) : 1 – 28
Christin, T., & Trechsel, A. H. (2014). At the Crossroads of National Identity and Institutional Attachment: Switzerland’s EU Integration in Perspective. Essex. ac. uk.
Cederman, Lars-Erik, ed. (2001). Constructing Europe's identity: the external dimension. Boulder: Lynne Rienner. pp. 89–81
Dalberg-Acton, J. (Lord Acton). 1907 [1862]. ‘Nationality’, in J. N. Figgis and R. V. Laurence (eds.), The History of Freedom and Other Essays. London: Macmillan
Dardanelli, P., & Stojanović, N. (2011),The acid test? Competing theses on the nationality - democracy nexus and the case of Switzerland. Nations and Nationalism, 17(2), 357–376.
Eugster, B., & Strijbis, O. (2011). The Swiss: A political nation? Swiss Political Science Review, 17(4), 394–416.
 Gagnon, A.-G. (2009). The moral foundations of asymmetrical federalism: a normative exploration of the case of Quebec and Canada. Multinational Democracies, June, 319–337.
Gerschewski, Johannes. 2013. The Three Pillars of Stability: Legitimation, Repression, and Co-optation in Autocratic Regimes. Democratization 20 (1): 13–38.
Habermas, J. 1996 [1991]. Citizenship and national identity, in J. Habermas (ed.), Between Facts and Norms – Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge: Polity
Hailemariam, Chefena. Kroon, Sjaak. Joel Walters (1999). Multilingualism and Nation Building: Language and Education in Eritrea. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 20 (6),
Hechter, Michael. 2000. Containing Nationalism. New York: Oxford University Press.
Igbini, M. D. (2020). The Challenges of Nation- Building and Peace-Building in Nigeria. Journal of Danubian Studies and Research, 10(1), 425–439.
Ipperciel, D. (2011). Switzerland’s nationhood: A normative approach. Nations and Nationalism, 17(4), 794–814.
Karolina adamova , Antonin Lojek(2016), Defining the Term and Content Nation (A Necessary Condition for Understanding the Terms “Nationality” and “National Minority”), Krakowskie Studia z Historii Państwa i Prawa; 9 (1), . 97-109.
Kohn, H. )1956(. Nationalism and Liberty – The Swiss Example. London: Allen and Unwin
Kriesi, H. and Trechsel, A. )2008(. The Politics of Switzerland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kymlicka, W. )1995(. Multicultural Citizenship – A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights. Oxford: Clarendon Press
Kymlicka, W. )2007(. The Global Diffusion of Multiculturalism: Trends, Causes, Consequences. in S. Tierney (ed.), Accommodating Cultural Diversity. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Kymlicka, Will. )2001(. Politics in the Vernacular: Nationalism, Multiculturalism, and Citizenship. New York: Oxford University Press.
Lecours, A. (2000). Ethnic and civic nationalism: Towards a new dimension. Space and Polity, 4(2), 153–166.
Lijphart, Arend. (2004). Constitutional Design for Divided Societies. Journal of Democracy 15 (2): 96–109
Lustick, Ian S., Dan Miodownik, and Roy J. Eidelson. )2004(. Secessionism in Multicultural States: Does Sharing Power Prevent or Encourage It? American Political Science Review 98 (2): 209–229.
Mason, A. )2000(. Community, Solidarity and Belonging – Levels of Community and their Normative Significance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Massey, H. )1969(. Lord Acton’s theory of nationality, Review of Politics 31, 4: 495-508
Matyja, M. (2018). Determinant factors of multiculturalism in Switzerland. Review of Nationalities, 8(1), 83–102.
McRae, K. (1975). The principle of territoriality and the principle of personality in multilingual states. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 4, 33–54
Miller, D. )1995(. On Nationality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Müller, J. W. (2008). A general theory of constitutional patriotism. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 6(1), 72-95.
Mylonas, Harris (2012). The Politics of Nation-Building: Making Co-Nationals, Refugees, and Minorities, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Nassari, Abdolreza (2021), Racial nationalism in contemporary Iranian history, Tehran, gameh no, (In Persian)
Ozkarimli, Umut, (2020) contemporary debates on nationalism: a critical engagement Translator Taher Asgharpour, Tehran, negah moaser (In Persian)
Rahmanzadeh Heravi, Mohammad,(2015) Race, ethnic and nation in Iran, Tehran, aneh book, (In Persian)
Rash, F. (1998). The German language in Switzerland: Multilingualism, diglossia and variation. (German Linguistic and Cultural Studies. Vol. 3.) Berne: Pe-ter Lang
Schmid, C. (2001). The politics of language: Conflict, identity and cultural pluralism in comparative perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Schmid, C. )1981(. Conflict and Consensus in Switzerland. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Tonkiss, K. (2013). Constitutional patriotism, migration and the post-national dilemma. Citizenship studies, 17(3-4), 491-504.
Zimmer, O. )2003(. A Contested Nation. History, Memory and Nationalism in Switzerland, 1761– 1891. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
 
Translated References into English
Ahmadi, Abdul Wahhab, (2018) “Nation, National sense, Nationalism", Tehran, agah, [In Persian]
Gorji Azandaryani, Ali Akbar (2017), Foundations of Public Law, Tehran: Jungle Publications. [In Persian]
Karimi, Ali (2018), An Introduction to the Sociology of Ethnic Diversity: Issues and Theories, Tehran: Samt Publications. [In Persian]
Kohen, Bruce (2014), Foundations of Sociology, Translated and Adapted by Gholamabbas Tavassoli and Reza Fazeli, Tehran: Samt Publications. [In Persian]
Kymlicka, Will (2019), Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights, Translated by Ebrahim Eskafi, Tehran: Shirazeh Publications. [In Persian]
Nassari, Abdolreza (2021), “Racial nationalism in contemporary Iranian history", Tehran, gameh no. [In Persian]
Ozkarimli, Umut, (2020) “contemporary debates on nationalism: a critical engagement” Translator Taher Asgharpour, Tehran, negah moaser. [In Persian]
Pour Ezat, Ali Asghar, Taheri Attar, Ghazaleh (2010), "The Application of Good Governance for Nation-Building in Light of Interdisciplinary Studies," Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities, Vol. 3, No. 1, Winter, pp. 173-193. [In Persian]
Pour Ezat, Ali Asghar, Taheri Attar, Ghazaleh, Sadabadi, Ali Asghar (2012), "Leadership of Sustainable Nation-Building Based on Social Justice," Political and International Research Quarterly, Islamic Azad University, Shahreza Branch, No. 11, Summer, pp. 1-22. [In Persian]
Rahmanzadeh Heravi, Mohammad,(2015) "Race, ethnic and nation in Iran", Tehran, aneh book. [In Persian]
Siasi, Alireza (2008), Report of a Life, Tehran: Akhtaran Publications. [In Persian]
Taheri Attar, Ghazaleh (2013), "Designing and Explaining the Model of Sustainable Nation-Building," Strategic Policy Research Quarterly, Vol. 2, No. 7, Winter (Serial No. 37). [In Persian]
Zargar, Afshin (2010), "Models of State-Nation Building: From the European Model to the Eurasian Model," Specialized Quarterly of Political Science, Vol. 4, No. 7, pp. 97-160. [In Persian]