نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 کارشناس ارشد اقتصاد دانشگاه بوعلی سینا، همدان، ایران

2 استاد اقتصاد دانشگاه بوعلی سینا، همدان، ایران

چکیده

در ‌فرایند توسعه اقتصادی کشورها، دستیابی به ویژگی‏های مهم حکمرانی خوب و همچنین به‎کارگیری ابزار کنترل فساد در جهت جلب رضایت عمومی و کاهش کسری بودجه، از جمله اهداف مهم برنامه‏ای دولت‏ها محسوب می‏گردد. فساد یکی از عوامل مهم بازدارنده‎ رشد و انحراف در کارایی اقتصادی است که معمولاً منجر به افزایش کسری بودجه دولت‏ها می‏شود. در این رابطه تجربه نشان داده که تقویت پایه‎های حکمرانی خوب به‌عنوان فرصتی برای افزایش نرخ رشد، امنیت و بهبود فضای کسب و کار اقتصادی می‌تواند نقش بسزایی در رسیدن به اهداف توسعه پایدار و تعدیل ارقام کسری بودجه ایفا نماید. همچنین بهبود در کیفیت حکمرانی و به‏خصوص کنترل فساد دولتی می‎تواند منجر به مدیریت هزینه‎های عمومی، جلب اعتماد عمومی و افزایش درآمدهای مالیاتی، کاهش فرار مالیاتی و در نهایت کاهش کسری بودجه گردد. هدف از انجام پژوهش، بررسی اثر بازدارندگی حکمرانی خوب از طریق کنترل فساد بر کسری بودجه در اقتصاد کشورهای منطقه منا (MENA) است. برای این منظور، از داده‌های مربوط به شاخص‌های حکمرانی خوب و کنترل فساد کشورهای منتخب خاورمیانه و شمال آفریقا (MENA) طی سال‌های 2018-2002 استفاده شد. نتایج حاصل از برآورد مدل تخمین و اندازه‎گیری نوع رابطه و شدت تأثیرگذاری حکمرانی خوب و کنترل فساد بر کسری بودجه به روش گشتاورهای تعمیم‌یافته (GMM) در گروه کشورهای منتخب نشان می‌دهد که کنترل فساد تأثیر منفی و معنی‌دار و حکمرانی خوب تأثیر مثبت و معنی‌داری بر کسری بودجه دارد.
طبقه‌بندی JEL: D73, H11, H61

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Deterrent Effect of Good Governance and Corruption Control On Budget Deficit in Developing Economies

نویسندگان [English]

  • Hanieh Mohebikia 1
  • Hamid Sepehrdoust 2

1 M.A, Department of Economics, Bu Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran

2 Professor, Department of Economics, Bu Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran

چکیده [English]

Extended Abstract
Introduction
In the economic development of countries, important features of good governance and using corruption control are the key factors to gain more public satisfaction and reduce the budget deficit are among the important program goals of governments. The necessity of the budget was formed in parallel with the importance of the role of governments in economic activities, and over time, the structure changed and evolved. In general, governments enter the market when the market alone cannot create efficiency in the economy and the prices do not reflect the real social costs and benefits. Corruption is one of the factors hindering growth and deviation in the economy Of course, the inability of the market mechanism alone does not justify the government's intervention in financial issues, in other words, although market failure is only a necessary condition for government intervention in the economy, it is not a sufficient condition. The condition is necessary because, according to the theory of the classics, if the market mechanism worked satisfactorily through the operation of invisible hands, there would be no need for government intervention. Generally, the government intervenes in the economy to prevent market failures, and protect people's rights, and international trade. According to the mentioned cases, the necessity of the government's intervention in some matters was proved; The important point is that with the expansion of these interventions and the increase of the activities of the public sector, the volume of their expenses has also expanded significantly over time. This issue has made the importance of paying attention to the budget and funding solutions even more important efficiency, which usually leads to increasing government budget deficits. In this regard, experience has shown that strengthening the foundations of good governance as an opportunity to increase growth, and security and improve the business environment can play a significant role in achieving the goals of sustainable development and adjusting the deficit figures. In the meantime, the effect of financial corruption directly and the effect of indicators determining good governance indirectly on the budget deficit are of serious concern. Improving the quality of governance, and especially controlling government corruption, can lead to managing public spending, gaining public confidence, increasing tax revenues, reducing tax evasion, and ultimately reducing the budget deficit. Therefore, the need to control corruption and increase the quality of governance becomes important. Corruption is like a force that damages the proper functioning of markets. In addition, the quality of governance is also another important institutional factor that affects the process of growth and development and improving the performance of the tax system and as a result reducing the budget deficit. 
 
Materials and Methods
The purpose of this study is to investigate the deterrent effect of good governance on the budget deficit through corruption control in developing economies of the Middle East and North Africa (MENA), during the years 2002-2018; using the generalized method of moments (GMM).
Results and Discussion
Many macro variables affect the budget deficit, and the focus of the present research was on two variables of good governance and corruption control, because today, financial corruption and its fight is considered as a fundamental issue in many different countries of the world.
There are different types of corruption, one of which is financial corruption. Financial corruption is a complex phenomenon that has various effects. So that the scope of financial corruption is wide and it ranges from an individual act of paying a bribe to a comprehensive malpractice that includes all elements of the political and economic system. Corruption is sometimes considered as a structural problem of politics or economy, and it may also be considered as a cultural and moral issue; But in this research, only one of the consequences of corruption, i.e. the effect of financial corruption control on the budget deficit, was investigated. In general, it can be said that good governance is the practice of economic, political, and executive management of a country's resources to achieve the set goals.
In line with the results of the studies of many thinkers, the results of this study also show the fact that the existence of corruption and lack of good governance can aggravate the problems of the underdevelopment of the countries under study, especially the problem of government budget deficits in be the economy of the country; Because in different economic systems, an important part of the government's duties are implemented through the budget.
 
Conclusion
 
The results of the estimation of the research model showed that the main variables introduced have a significant effect on the budget deficit of governments; so the variable of corruption control has a negative and significant effect on the budget deficit, and the hypothesis related to the significance of the effect of the variable of corruption control on reducing the budget deficit cannot be rejected. The good governance index has a positive and significant effect on the budget deficit in the group of countries under study; Therefore, the hypothesis based on a meaningful relationship between good governance and budget deficit cannot be rejected either. The negative relationship between corruption control and tax revenue is confirmed; With the justification that the variable of good governance and corruption control affects both government revenues and government expenses Considering the extent and severity of the influence of these variables on government revenues and expenses in the MENA countries, the positive or negative relationship between good governance variables and corruption control on the budget deficit can be extracted. The general level of prices and the inflation index also showed that it can have a positive and significant effect on the government budget deficit in the MENA group of countries
So creeping and mild inflations have a positive effect on investment and severe inflation also. It severely reduces and sometimes stops productive investment, Finally, based on the findings of the current research and the results of the estimation of the measurement model, the negative effect of corruption control and the positive effect of good governance on the budget deficit were confirmed.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Corruption Control
  • Good Governance
  • Budget Deficit
  • GMM
فارسی
ایزدخواستی، حجت (1395). تحلیل فساد و کیفیت حکمرانی بر عملکرد نظام مالیاتی. سیاست‌گذاری پیشرفت اقتصادی دانشگاه الزهرا (س4(10)؛ 118-93.
باغستانی، مسعود و میری، اشرف‌السادات و صمدی بروجنی، رضا (1394). لزوم دخالت دولت در مقررات‌گذاری و نظارت بر بازارهای مالی. مجله اقتصادی، شماره‌های 7 و 8؛ 58-43.
بالتاجی، بدی (1391). اقتصادسنجی (جلد اول)، مترجمان رضا طالبلو، شعله باقری پرمهر، چاپ اول، انتشارات نشرنی، تهران.
بشیری، عباس و شقاقی شهری، وحید (1390). حکمرانی خوب، فساد و رشد اقتصادی؛ رویکردی اقتصادی به مقوله حکمرانی خوب. بررسیهای بازرگانی، 9(48)؛81-69.
پور عزت، علی اصغر (1389). مبانی مدیریت دولتی. تهران، انتشارات سمت.
ترکمانی، علی دینی؛ حاجی حسینی، حجت‌اله و رمضان‌پور نرگسی، قاسم (1398). حکمرانی، نظام نوآوری ملی و ظرفیت جذب، هم‌پایی و نوآوری فناورانه: مدل‌سازی نظری. مدلسازی اقتصادی، 13(3)؛ 33-1.
دادگر، یدالله؛ نظری، روح‌الله و صیامی‎عراقی، ابراهیم (1392). دولت و مالیات بهینه در اقتصاد بخش عمومی و کارکرد دولت و مالیات در ایران. مطالعات اقتصادی کاربردی در ایران، 2(5)؛ 29-1.
دانایی‌فرد، حسین؛ باباشاهی، جبار؛ آذر، عادل و کردنائیج، اسدالله (1391). تحول در رفاه ملی: آیا حکمرانی خوب نقش مهمی ایفا می‌کند؟ پژوهش‌های مدیریت ایران؛ 62-45.
دولتی، علی؛ درویشی، فرزاد و عزت الله، لطفی (1392). حکمرانی خوب و کنترل فساد در ایران و سایر کشورها. دانش انتظامی،2(7)؛ 68-47.
سپهردوست، حمید، رجبی، فهیمه و باروتی، مهسا (۱۳۹۴). بررسی تأثیر حکمرانی خوب بر عملکرد درآمدی نظام مالیاتی. نظریه‌های کاربردی اقتصاد، 2 (2)؛ 126-103.
سپهردوست، حمید؛ فطرس، محمدحسن و برجیسیان، عادل (۱۳۹۵). بررسی مقایسه‌ای کانال‌های تأثیرگذاری فساد بر رشد اقتصادی در اقتصادهای رانتی و غیر رانتی. نظریه‌های کاربردی اقتصاد، 3 (1)؛ 88-59.
سحابی، بهرام؛ اعتصامی، منصور، و امین پور، خالد (1392). بررسی اثر حکمرانی خوب و اندازه دولت بر توسعه مالی در کشورهای منتخب. فصلنامه پژوهش های رشد و توسعه اقتصادی، 3(12)؛ 118-105.
سلاطین پروانه و غفاری صومعه، نیلوفر (1395). تأثیر فساد بر کسری بودجه. فصلنامه سیاسی مالی و اقتصادی، 4(14)؛ 131-150.
سلاطین، پروانه و غفاری صومعه، نیلوفر (1397). بررسی عوامل مؤثر بر کسری بودجه با تأکید بر حاکمیت قانون. سیاستهای مالی و اقتصادی، 6 (22)؛ 158-123.
سلاطین، پروانه؛ اسلامبولچی، سحر و یوسفی زاده فرد، حسین (1393). بررسی اثر کیفیت حکمرانی بر درآمدهای مالیاتی در گروه کشورهای منتخب. کنفرانس بین المللی حسابداری، اقتصاد و مدیریت مالی تهران.
صنوبری، محمد (1388). مقدمه‌ای بر سرمایه انسانی (مفاهیم، ویژگی‌ها و شاخص‌های اندازه‌گیری). توسعه انسانی پلیس؛ 6(22)؛ 136-119.
طادی، مولود؛ سامتی، مرتضی؛ رجبی، مصطفی و قبادی، سارا (1399). اثر جایگزینی درآمد نفت با درآمد مالیات بر شاخص نهادی حکمرانی در ایران. مطالعات اقتصادی کاربردی ایران، 9(34)؛ 161-137.
طیبی، سید کمال؛ حاجی کرمی، مرضیه و سریری، هما (1390). تحلیل درجه باز بودن مالی و تجاری روی توسعه مالی ایران و شرکای تجاری. تحقیقات راه اندیشه؛ 60-39.
قاضی طباطبایی، نصرت؛ نصرتی، روح‌الله و کاظمی، علی (1391). ارزیابی الگوی نظری حکمرانی خوب در تبیین وضعیت توسعه انسانی. توسعه محلی، 4(1)؛ 52-39.
کریمی پتانلار، سعید؛ بابازاده، محمد و حمیدی، نعیمه (1390). اثر فساد مالی بر درآمدهای مالیاتی و مخارج دولت: مطالعه موردی کشورهای منتخب درحال توسعه. پژوهشها و سیاستهای اقتصادی، 19(57)؛ 169-157.
کریمی، محمدشریف؛ دورباش، معصومه و حیدریان، مریم (1396). بررسی ارتباط و تأثیر شاخص های حکمرانی خوب بر رشد اقتصادی در ایران؛ با رویکرد تصحیح خطای برداری. جامعه شناسی اقتصادی و توسعه، 6(3)؛ 155-127.
کمیجانی، اکبر و سلاطین، پروانه (1389). تأثیر حکمرانی خوب بر رشد اقتصادی در گروه کشورهای منتخب OPEC و OECD. مدلسازی اقتصادی، 6 (2)؛ 24-1.
مرادی، ابراهیم؛ رهنما، علی و حیدریان، سمیرا (1396). تاثیر شاخص های حکمرانی خوب بر کنترل فساد. فصلنامه اقتصاد مقداری، 14(4)؛ 182-151.
صفریان،روح الله؛ امام جمعه زاده،سید جواد (1396). الگوی حکمرانی خوب؛ سرمایه اجتماعی و توسعه همه‌جانبه. فصلنامه دولت‌پژوهی،3(12)؛ 181-145.
References
Ajaz, T. and Ahmad, E. (2010). The effect of corruption and governance on tax revenues. The Pakistan Development Review, 49(4); 405-417.
Arellano, M. and Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 58(2); 277-297.
Baltagi, B. H. and Wu, P. X. (1999). Unequally spaced panel data regressions with AR (1) disturbances. Econometric Theory. 15 (6); 814- 823.
Barisik, S. and Baris, A. (2017). Impact of governance on budget deficit in developing countries. Theoretical and Applied Economics, 2 (611); 111-130.
Bird, R. M.; Martinez-Vazquez, J., and Torgler, B. (2008). Tax effort in developing countries and high-income countries: The impact of corruption, voice and accountability. Economic Analysis and Policy, 38(1), 55-71.
Detotto, C.; Giannoni, S. and Goavec, C. (2020). Does good governance attract tourists? Tourism Management, 82, 104155. doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2020.104155
Detotto, C. and Mccanon, B. C. (2017). Economic freedom and public, non-market institutions: Evidence from criminal prosecution. Economics of Governance, 18(2); 107–128.
Doornbos, M. (2003). Good governance: The metamorphoses of policy metaphor. Journal of International Affairs. 57(1); 17-20.
 
Dzhumashev, R. (2014). Corruption and growth: the role of governance, public spending and economic development. Economic Modeling, 37; 202-215.
Egbide, B. and Ade’ Agbude, G. (2012). Good budgeting and good governance: A comparative discourse.  The Public Administration and Social Policies Review, 2(9); 49-59.
Hessami, Z. (2014). Political corruption, public procurement and budget compodition: theory and evidence from OECD countries. European journal of political Economy, 34; 372-389.
Fourie, D. (2013). The application of good governance. Journal of Public Administration, 4(22); 435-443.
Huynh, K. P. and Jacho-Chavez, D.T. (2009). Growth and governance: a nonparametric analysis, Journal of Comparative Economics, 37(1); 121-143.
Imam, P. A. and Jacobs, D. (2007). Effect of corruption on tax revenues in the Middle East, Review of Middle East Economics and Finance Rev, Middle East Econ. Fin. 10(1); 1-24.
Khan, M. (2007). Governance, economic growth and development since the 1960s. DESA Working Paper No. 54.
Kaufmann, D.; Kraay, A. and Mastruzzi, M. (2010). The worldwide governance indicators, methodology and analytical issues. The World Bank, Development Research Group, Macroeconomics and Growth Team; 1-29.
Lateef, k. S. (1991). Comment on governance and development. The World Bank Economic Review, 5(1); 295-298.
Li, S. and Filer, L. (2007). The effect of governance environment on the choice of investment mode and the strategic implications, Journal of world Business, 42(2); 80-98. Available online at www. Science direct. Com/ bam/ jwb.
Li, H.; Xu, L. C. and Zou, H. F. (2000). Corruption, income distribution, and growth. Economics and Politics, No.12; 155–182.
Lima, M. S. M. and Delen, D. (2019). Predicting and explaining corruption across countries: A machine learning approach. Government Information Quarterly, 101407.
Nuijten, M. and Anders, G. (2017). Corruption and the secret of law: An introduction. Corruption and the secret of law. New York: Rutledge; 1–24.
Ribeiro, H. V.; Alves, L. G.; Martins, A. F.; Lenzi, E. K. and Perc, M. (2018). The dynamical structure of political corruption networks. Journal of Complex Networks, No. 6, 989–1003. https://doi.org/10.1093/comnet/cny002.
Rose R., Peiffer C. (2019). Setting standards for good and bad governance. In: Bad Governance and Corruption. Political Corruption and Governance. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92846-3_1.
Schneider, F. (2006). Corruption and the shadow economy: an empirical analysis. Discussion Paper No. 1936.
Sepehrdoust, H. and Zamani Shabkhaneh, S. (2015). Impact of knowledge-based components on total factor productivity of MENA countries. Iran Economic Review, 19(2); 149-163.
Tanzi, V. (1998). Corruption around the world: causes, consequences, scopes and cures. IMF Staff Papers, 45(4); 559-594.
Timmon, S.; Jeffrey, F. and Garfias, F. (2015). Revealed corruption taxation and fiscal accountability: evidence from Brazil. World Development, Vol.70; 13-27.
The Control of Corruption Index (2018). Published by the World Bank, at website:
World Bank (2019). World Development Indicators database.
 
Translated References into English
 
Baghestani, Masoud and Miri, Ashraf al-Sadat and Samadi Borojni, Reza (2014). The necessity of government intervention in regulation and supervision of financial markets. Economic magazine, numbers 7 and 8; 58-43 [In Persian].
Baltaji, Badi (2011). Economics (Volume 1), translators: Reza Taleblo, Sholeh Bagheri Parmehr, first edition, Nashreni Publishing House, Tehran [In Persian].
Bashiri, Abbas and Shaghaghi Shahri, Vahid (2010). good governance, corruption, and economic growth; An economic approach to the category of good governance. Business Reviews, 9(48); 69-81[In Persian].
Dadger, Yadullah; Nazari, Ruhollah and Siami-Iraghi, Ibrahim (2012). Optimal government and taxation in the public sector economy and the function of government and taxation in Iran. Quarterly Journal of Applied Economic Studies in Iran, 2(5); 29-1[In Persian].
Danaeifard, Hossein; Babashahi, Jabar; Azar, Adel and Kardanaij, Asadullah (2011). Transformation in national welfare: Does good governance play an important role? Iranian management researches; 62-45 [In Persian].
Dolati, Ali; Darvishi, Farzad and Ezzatullah, Lotfi (2012). Good governance and corruption control in Iran and other countries. Police Knowledge Quarterly, 2(7); 68-47 [In Persian].
Ghazitabatabai, Nusrat; Nusrati, Ruhollah and Kazemi, Ali (2011). Evaluation of the theoretical model of good governance in explaining the state of human development. Journal of Local Development, 4(1); 52-39 [In Persian].
Izdakhasi, Hojjat (2015). Analysis of corruption and the quality of governance on the performance of the tax system. Alzahra University Economic Progress Policy Quarterly (S), 4(10); 118-93[In Persian].
Kamijani, Akbar and Salatin, Parvaneh (2009). The effect of good governance on economic growth in the selected group of OPEC and OECD countries. Economic Modeling Quarterly, 6 (2); 24-1 [In Persian].
Karimi Patanlar, Saeed; Babazadeh, Mohammad and Hamidi, Naimeh (2018). The effect of financial corruption on tax revenues and government expenditures: a case study of selected developing countries. Economic Policy and Research Quarterly, 19(57); 169-157 [In Persian].
Karimi, Mohammad Sharif; Dorbash, Masoumeh and Heydarian, Maryam (2016). Investigating the relationship and impact of good governance indicators on economic growth in Iran; With vector error correction approach. Economic Sociology and Development, 6(3); 155-127 [In Persian].
Moradi, Ibrahim; Rahnama, Ali and Heydarian, Samira (2016). The effect of good governance indicators on corruption control. Quantitative Economics Quarterly, 14(4); 151-182[In Persian].
Pour Ezzat, Ali Asghar (2009). Basics of public administration. Tehran, Samit Publications [In Persian].
Safarian, Ruhollah; Imam Jumazadeh, Seyyed Javad (2016). Good governance model, social capital, and comprehensive development. state studies, 3(12); 181-145 [In Persian].
Sahabi, Bahram; Etisami, Mansour, and Aminpour, Khalid (2012). Investigating the effect of good governance and government size on financial development in selected countries. Economic Growth and Development Research Quarterly, 3(12); 118-105[In Persian].
Salatin, Parvaneh and Ghafarisoumeh, Niloufer (2015). The effect of corruption on the budget deficit. Financial and Economic Political Quarterly, 4(14); 131-150[In Persian].
Salatin, Parvaneh and Ghafarisoumeh, Niloufer (2017). Investigating factors affecting the budget deficit with an emphasis on the rule of law. Financial and Economic Policy Quarterly, 6 (22); 158-123[In Persian].
Salatin, parvaneh; Islambolchi, Sahar and Yousefizadeh Fard, Hossein (2014). Investigating the effect of governance quality on tax revenues in selected countries. Tehran International Accounting, Economics and Financial Management Conference [In Persian].
Senobari, Mohammad (2008). An introduction to human capital (concepts, characteristics, and measurement indicators). human development of the police; 6(22); 119-136 [In Persian].
Salatin, Parvaneh (2018). The effect of governance on entrepreneurship in the group of selected countries: panel data approach. Journal of state studies, 5(20);71-102 [In Persian].
Sepherdoost, Hamid, Rajabi, Fahima and Barouti, Mehsa (2014). Investigating the effect of good governance on the revenue performance of the tax system. Applied Theories of Economics, 2 (2); 103-126 [In Persian].
Sepherdoost, Hamid; Fitras, Mohammad Hassan and Barjisian, Adel (2015). A comparative study of the influence channels of corruption on economic growth in rentier and non-rentier economies. Applied Theories of Economics, 3 (1); 88-59 [In Persian].
Tadi, born; Samti, Morteza; Rajabi, Mustafa and Qabadi, Sara (2019). The effect of replacing oil income with tax income on the institutional index of governance in Iran. Iranian Applied Economic Studies Quarterly, 9(34); 161-137 [In Persian].
Tayebi, Seyyed Kamal; Haji Karmi, Marzieh and Sariri, Homa (2010). Analysis of the degree of financial and commercial openness on the financial development of Iran and its trading partners. The Quarterly Research of Way Andisheh; 39-60 [In Persian].
Turkmani, Ali Dini; Haji Hosseini, Hojatoleh and Ramzanpour Nargesi, Qasim (2018). Governance, national innovation system, and absorptive capacity, convergence and technological innovation: theoretical modeling.  Economic Modeling Quarterly, 13(3); 33-1[In Persian].