نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

دانشیار سیاستگذاری عمومی دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

چکیده

تحلیل ساختار حقوق اساسی در جمهوری اسلامی ایران می‌تواند به بازتعریف نظام حکمرانی و ظرفیت‌های اصلاح قانون اساسی منجر شود. این مقاله با رویکردی نهادی- هنجاری در پی نشان دادن ظرفیت‌های نظری نهضت قانون اساسی از سویی و ظرفیت‌های منطقه‌الفراغ از سوی دیگر برای بازبینی قانون اساسی جمهوری اسلامی است.  این دو سرچشمه نظری می‌توانند با تفکیک مقبولیت و کارآمدی اجرایی از مشروعیت نظام، به افزایش دامنه اختیارات عمومی و به احیای قدرت نهاد دولت و مجلس منجر شوند. در حکمرانی ایرانی، مخدوش شدگی تقسیم‌کار ملی به شکل «ملوک‌الطوایفی دیوانی» در همه‌جا دامن گسترد شده و تمایز ساختاری فزاینده فضاهای اجتماعی که منجر به این تفکیک منطقی دین از برخی حوزه‌های سیاستی می‌شود، نادیده گرفته‌شده است. این در حالی است که مفهوم منطقه‌الفراغ، جهت‌گیری‌هایی کلی به سیاست‌های عمومی می‌دهد که می‌تواند اختیارات و وظایف را به مردم و دولت و مجلس بازگرداند بدون آنکه پای مشروعیت نظام سیاسی را به میان کشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Governance and Structure: A Theoretical Reflection on the Structure of Constitutional Rights in Iran

نویسنده [English]

  • Kioomars Ashtarian

Associate Professor, Department of Public Policy, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

چکیده [English]

Analyzing the structure of Constitutional law in the Islamic Republic of Iran can be used to identify the capacities of amending the Constitution and redefining the Iranian governance system. This article, with an institutional-normative approach, seeks to show the theoretical capacities of the constitutional movement on the one hand and the capacities of Mantaghato-laugh (Free area of Islamic regulation) on the other hand to review the Constitution of the Islamic Republic. In Iranian governance, the distortion of the national division of institutional tasks in the form of bureaucratic-tribal monarchy has been widespread in the governance structure. As such, the structural differentiation of social spaces, which leads to the logical separation of religion from public policies, has been ignored. This is while the concept of a “Free area of Islamic regulation” gives general directions to public policies that can return powers and duties to the people, to the government, and the parliament without compromising the legitimacy of the political regime. This article has several theoretical pillars that are used synthetically in connection with the main finding of the article. 1) order and power, 2) separation of powers, 3) legitimacy, 4) unity of religion and politics, and 5) constitutional orientation of public policy making. The main point of the article is that the theoretical capacities of these 5 pillars can be useful for analyzing the structure of the Islamic Republic of Iran's Constitution and revising it. First, with a normative approach, we have discussed the right to exercise power and the separation of powers (the first and second theoretical pillars). The fact that the constitution guides the operation of political societies is born from the idea that the government must protect the fundamental rights of individuals. The fundamental rights have a technical dimension that organizes the exercise of power and therefore creates limitations for the exercise of power. That is why separation of powers is considered a tool against abuse of power, prevention of tyranny, and a factor of national self-actualization, and according to Montesquieu, there will be no freedom without separation of powers. In terms of the third theoretical pillar of this article, it has been discussed that the relation of legitimacy and efficiency are closely intertwined in Iranian governance. In the Constitution, there are several principles that not only determine the direction of the policy-making systems but also lay the foundations of an interventionist government with full responsibility for the welfare of the citizens. As a result, public policies take into account the legitimacy of the political system, and in practice, the legitimacy of the political regime depends on its efficiency. This phenomenon has found an ideological facet in the shadow of the theory of Unity of religion and politics. With regards to the relationship between religion and politics in the Islamic Republic (the fourth pillar of the article), we are facing two aspects of political jurisprudence theory and legal tradition, which appear to be aligned but at the same time can be contradictory. On the one hand, legitimacy refers to the divine sovereignty over the world, and it is embodied in the Islamic Republic's Constitution. On the other hand, for some “official” theorists of the last two decades, this divine sovereignty has led to the acceptance of an approach called the theory of “discovery” and “designation”, which we call "revelation legitimacy". This revolutionist approach, in its essence, makes the legal processes of the constitution irrelevant, which means that at first, it reduces the role of experts to a passive role in the designation of Leader.  The fifth pillar of the article deals with the "basic rules of public policies" and the issues of political structure related to public policies. The importance of this article is that it allows freedom of public policy-making to the citizens.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Constitution
  • Mantaghat-o-leverage
  • Unity of religion and politics
  • Public policy making
  • legitimacy
  • Discovery theory
فارسی
اشتریان، کیومرث.  (۱۳۸۸-1) بازتعریف نقش نهادهای سیاستگذار در جمهوری اسلامی ایران، مجله‌ دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه تهران، دوره 40، شماره 1.
جوان آراسته, حسین. (1395) تفکیک قوا در نظام سیاسی اسلام و جمهوری اسلامی ایران. فقه و حقوق. دوره 49، شماره 1.
حسینی، سید جعفر. روح الله ابوجعفری، داود کریمی پور، (1400). گفتارهایی پیرامون اقتصاد سیاسی قواعد اساسی، دانشگاه امام صادق (ع) و پژوهشکده مطالعات فناوری، چاپ اول
حقیقت, سید صادق. (1383). گونه‌شناسی ارتباط دین و سیاست در اندیشه سیاسی شیعه، هستی و شناخت.دوره 0، شماره 77
حقیقت، صادق. (1383 ). گونه شناسی ارتباط دین و سیاست در اندیشه سیاسی شیعه. نامه مفید، شماره 34،
دوتوکویل، آلکسی. (1396). تحلیل دموکراسی در آمریکا. مترجم رحمت الله مقدم مراغه ای، انتشارات علمی و فرهنگی، چاپ چهارم.
سجادی مرضیه و موسوی، احمد ) 1399(. تاثیر تفکیک قوا بر عملکرد جمهوری اسلامی ایران. فقه و ﺣﻘﻮق ﻣﻌﺎﺻﺮ/ ش13.
صحیفه‌ امام خمینی، ج 4، ص 429. http://www.imam-khomeini.ir/fa/n20644
طباطبایی سید محمد (1396). نظریه تفکیک قوا و سازماندهی قدرت سیاسی نزد دولت، دولت پژوهی، ، دوره 3، شماره 12
عظیمی آرانی، حسین. (1400). به کوشش خسرو نورمحمدی و احمد صمیمی. برنامه ریزی توسعه در ایران (بازخوانی نظرات دکتر حسین عظیمی آرانی). انتشارات سازمان برنامه و بودجه کشور، ص.60.
فتحی, یونس, عروتی موفق, محمد مهدی. (1401). بررسی تطبیقی مفهوم و کارکرد تفکیک قوا در قانون اساسی جمهوری اسلامی ایران و پاکستان مطالعات تطبیقی حقوق کشورهای اسلامی1(1),. 95-116
قریشی, سیدعباس، معصومی, مجید. (1399). بررسی جایگاه قدرت در قانون اساسی ونظام جمهوری اسلامی ایران. سیاست‌های راهبردی و کلان 8(31), 560-575. doi: 10.30507/jmsp.2020.104459
 محمودی، امیررضا. میری بالاجورشری، سیده مهشید (1400) جنبش‌های قانون اساسی‌گرایی در اروپای دوره قرون وسطی.  دانشنامه های حقوقی دوره چهارم، شماره 13.
مصباح یزدی (بی تا). نظریه سیاسی اسلام؛ جلسه سى و یکم: بررسى و نقد نظریه تفکیک قوا. mesbahyazdi.ir/node/2174
مصباح یزدی، محمدتقی. (1384). نظر آیت الله مصباح در باره رای مردم (سخنرانی). سایت رجانیوز، https://www.rajanews.com/news/236505  به نقل از: پرتو سخن؛ 7/10/1384
موسوی‌زاده، سید محسن. (1395). تاریخ معاصر ایران از دیدگاه امام خمینی. دیدگاه امام خمینی درباره قانون اساسی مشروطه چه بود؟ مؤسسه‌ تنظیم و نشر آثار امام، چاپ دوم، ، ص 69. http://www.imam-khomeini.ir/fa/n20644/
ورعی، سید جواد. (1396). شهید بهشتی و حقوق ملت در قانون اساسی. سیاست نامه مفید، بهار و تابستان 1396  شماره 2.
هاشمی، محمد (1382). فلسفه‌ سیاسی تا حقوق اساسی. حقوق اساسی، سال اول، شماره اول، پاییز 1382،  ص. 192.
 
References
Aragón, Jorge. Political Legitimacy and Democracy. Loyola University Chicago. https://www.luc.edu › pdf › articlesforresourc
Asad, T. (1999). Religion, Nation-State, Secularism. In: P. van der Veer & H. Lehmann (Ed.), Nation and Religion: Perspectives on Europe and Asia (pp. 178-196). Princeton: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691219578-011
Bastien François. (2002). Droit constitutionnel et/ou institutions politiques. Pour sortir de la réserve d’indiens, dans Lucien Sfez Science politique et interdisciplinarité, Éditions de la Sorbonne, p.35. Open Edition Books License.
 Buchanan, James M. (1990). The Domain of Constitutional Economics, Constitutional Political Economy, 1(1): 1–18.
Buchanan, James M. (1988). Contractarian Political Economy and Constitutional Interpretation, the American Economic Review, 78(2): 135–39.
Couto, Cláudio, and Arantes, Rogério, (2022). 'Constitutions and Public Policies', in Conrado Hübner Mendes, Roberto Gargarella, and Sebastián Guidi (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Constitutional Law in Latin America ( online edn, Oxford Academic, 13 Jan. 2022), https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198786900.013.32, accessed 15 Mar. 2024.
Cozzaglio, Ilaria (2022). Legitimacy between Acceptance and Acceptability. Social Theory and Practice, 48 (1):61-88.
Germain JulienMarcel Proulx (1992). Le chevauchement des programmes fédéraux et provinciaux: un bilan Administration publique du Canada.Administration publique du Canada. Volume35, Issue3, Pages 402-420
Kavanagh, Aileen, (2016). 'The Constitutional Separation of Powers', in David Dyzenhaus, and Malcolm Thorburn (eds), Philosophical Foundations of Constitutional Law (Oxford, 2016; online edn, Oxford Academic, https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198754527.003.0012, accessed 11 Mar. 2024. P.221.
Lipset, S.M. (1969). Social Conflict, Legitimacy, and Democracy. In: Blondel, J. (eds) Comparative Government. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15318-3_7
Mathieu Chloe. (2015). La séparation des pouvoirs dans la jurisprudence du Conseil Constitutionnel. Droit.Université Montpellier, Français
Moradkhani, F. (2023). Hannah Arendt; The Constitution and Constituent Power. Public Law Researsh, 25(80), 47-94. doi: 10.22054/qjpl.2022.65583.2724
OCDE-CIO. (2024), Politique de protection des données et de la vie privée, h ttps://www.oecd-ioc-olympics-planning-toolkit.org/fr/risks-area-fr/structure-institutionnelle-et-gestion-organisationnelle/

Shugart, Matthew F., Giovanni Bognetti, David Fellman, C. Neal Tate. (2024). constitutional law. Britanica online. https://www.britannica.com/topic/constitutional-law

Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, (2023), online. Constitutionalism. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/constitutionalism
Waldron, Jeremy J. (2012), Separation of Powers or Division of Power? New York University Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers. 329. P.6. https://lsr.nellco.org/nyu_plltwp/329
 
Translated Refrences into English
Ashtarian, Kioomars. (1-2008) Redefining the Role of Policy-Making Institutions in the Islamic Republic of Iran, Tehran University School of Law and Political Science Journal, Volume 40, Number 1. [In Persian]
Ashtarian, Kioomars. (2008) The efficiency and dignity of the elites: investigation of the dignity of the clergy among the youth, Politics Quarterly, 39, No. 3. [In Persian]
Azimi Arani, Hossein. (2021). by the efforts of Khosrow Nurmohammadi and Ahmed Samimi. Development planning in Iran (reading the comments of Dr. Hossein Azimi Arani. Publications of the country's planning and budget organization, p. 60. [In Persian]
Dutoqueville, Alexey. (2016). Analysis of democracy in America. Translated by Rahmatullah Moghadam Maraghei, Scientific and Cultural Publications, 4th edition. [In Persian]
Imam Khomeini's Sahifeh, vol. 4, p. 429. http://www.imam-khomeini.ir/fa/n20644. [In Persian]
Fathi, Yunus, & Arouti Mawafaq, Mohammad Mahdi. (2022). A comparative study of the concept and function of the separation of powers in the constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran and Pakistan. Comparative Law Studies of Islamic Countries, 1(1), 95-116. doi: 10.22034/lcs.2022.252723 [In Persian]
Haghighat, Seyyed Sadegh. (2004). Typology of the relationship between religion and politics in Shia political thought. Biannual Scientific Journal of Existence and Cognition, 0(7), 5-32. [In Persian]
Hashemi, Mohammad. (2002). Political philosophy to fundamental rights. Constitutional Law Journal, first year, first issue, autumn, p. 192. [In Persian]
Hosseini, Seyyed Jafar. Ruhollah Abu Jaafari, Davood Karimipour, (1400). Speeches about the political economy of basic rules, Imam Sadiq University (AS) and Technology Studies Research Institute, first edition, p. 36. [In Persian]
Javan Arasteh, Hossein. (2016) Separation of Powers in the Political System of Islam and the Islamic Republic of Iran. Law and Jurisprudence. Volume 49, Number 1. [In Persian]
Mahmoudi, Amirreza. Miri Balajurshari, Seyedah Mehshid (2021) Constitutionalism movements in Europe during the Middle Ages. Legal encyclopedias of the fourth period, number 13. [In Persian]
Mesbah Yazdi. Political theory of Islam; 31st session: examination and criticism of the theory of separation of powers. mesbahyazdi.ir/node/2174. [In Persian]
Misbah Yazdi, Mohammad Taghi. (2004). "Ayatollah Misbah's opinion about people's vote" (speech). Rajanews website, https://www.rajanews.com/news/236505 quoted by: Partosakhn; 7/10/1384. [In Persian]
Mousavizadeh, Seyyed Mohsen. (2001). Contemporary history of Iran from Imam Khomeini's point of view. What was Imam Khomeini's opinion about the constitutional law? Institute for editing and publishing Imam's works, second edition, page 69. http://www.imam-khomeini.ir/fa/n20644/. [In Persian]
Qureshi, Seyed Abbas, & Masoumi, Majid. (2019). Examining the position of power in the Constitution and System of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Strategic and macro policies, 8(31), 560-575. doi: 10.30507/jmsp.2020.104459 [In Persian]
Sajjadi Marzieh and Ahmad Mousavi (2019). The effect of the separation of powers on the performance of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Contemporary jurisprudence and law/ No. 13. [In Persian]
Tabatabai Seyyed Mohammad (2016). The theory of separation of powers and the organization of political power in the government. State Research Quarterly, Law and Political Science Faculty Journal, third year, number 21, winter 2016, pages 33 2 [In Persian]
Warai, Seyyed Javad. (2016). Martyr Beheshti and the rights of the nation in the constitution. Useful policy magazine, spring and summer 2016, number 2. [In Persian]