نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 استادیار علوم سیاسی دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی ، تهران، ایران
2 دانشجوی دکتری علوم سیاسی دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران، ایران
چکیده
این پژوهش به بررسی تحول و تثبیت دولت مدرن در ایران می‌پردازد که در درون اندیشه‌های غربی قرارگرفته و نهادگرایی تاریخی را به‌عنوان چارچوب نظری به کار می‌گیرد. مبانی نظری بر ویژگی‌های متمایز یک دولت مدرن تأکید می‌کند و آن را از مدل‌های تاریخی مانند دولت مطلق جدا می‌کند. این تحقیق بر سیر تاریخی دولت در ایران متمرکز است و بر نیاز به درک دقیقی از رابطه رویدادها و بزنگاه‌های تاریخی و دولت مدرن تأکید دارد. هدف این پژوهش، کاوش جامع سیر تاریخی ایران در شکل‌گیری و تثبیت دولت مدرن است؛ بنابراین رویکرد نهاد گرایانه تاریخی به کار گرفته‌شده است که ارتباط نهادهای سیاسی مانند ارتش، نظام مالیاتی و قوه قضائیه را در دولت سازی تشخیص می‌دهد. روش تحقیق از تحلیل محتوا برای دیدگاه‌های متفکران غربی در مورد دولت مدرن و تحقیقات تاریخی استفاده می‌کند تا فرآیند شکل‌گیری را در یک بازه زمانی مشخص بررسی کند. یافته‌ها سیر ایران را از دوران صفویه تا انقلاب مشروطه تا دوران رضاشاه نشان می‌دهد. مشروطیت به‌عنوان یک جنبه محوری ظاهر می‌شود و نشان‌دهنده گذار به سمت حکومت‌داری مدرن و رابطه متوازن دولت-ملت است. دوران رضاشاه شاهد ناسیونالیسم و تمرکز اقتصادی است که اساساً پویایی قدرت را تغییر داده است. این کاوش تاریخی، تلاش ایران برای تفکر سیاسی مستقل و مفهوم متحول دولت-ملت را روشن می‌کند و درنهایت به درک سیاست‌ها و جهت‌گیری‌های معاصر ایران کمک می‌کند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
Institutional analysis of the formation and stabilization of the modern state in Iran
نویسندگان [English]
- Mostafa Kavakebyan 1
- Azim Matin 2
1 Assistant Professor, Department of Political Sciences, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran
2 Ph.D. Student, Department of Political Sciences, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]
In explicating the essence of a modern state, one must navigate a theoretical landscape defined by a set of characteristics, criteria, and requisites that differentiate the theory of the modern state from alternative paradigms, notably the absolute state. This theoretical realm, characterized by a prescriptive understanding of modern governance, serves as a guiding force, prompting governments worldwide to emulate its structural blueprint. This form of governance, intricately woven into the fabric of contemporary political landscapes, commands loyalty from its constituents. It wields influence both directly and indirectly, orchestrating societal affairs through a bureaucratic apparatus that intricately affects diverse aspects of citizens' lives.
In stark contrast to premodern governance reliant on tribute and force, the modern government garners economic sustenance directly from its citizenry, levying taxes to fulfill its distinct responsibilities. At the core of the modern state lies the imperative of nation-building, an endeavor necessitating the homogenization of social identity. However, the crux of our inquiry lies in the intricate relationship between us Iranians and the modern state. Delving into the historical narrative of the modern state as an experiential journey and scrutinizing it as a malleable theoretical model emerge as imperative undertakings.
The overarching purpose of this research is to meticulously examine the historical trajectory underpinning the formation and stabilization of the modern state in Iran. Anchored in the intellectual currents of Western thought, this scholarly pursuit aspires to enhance our understanding of the state's essence and its nuanced position within the Iranian milieu. A discerning analysis of the country's policies and orientations naturally unfolds as a byproduct of this historical exploration.
Guiding our intellectual journey is a theoretical framework rooted in historical institutionalism. This approach, a beacon in the study of state building in Iran, focuses on unraveling the intricate tapestry of social, political, and economic behaviors, tracing their evolution over time. Institutions, elevated to the status of independent variables, emerge as architects shaping individual and collective actions alongside the broader panorama of social and political phenomena. Recognizing that institutions not only mold actors' strategies but also sculpt their objectives, historical institutionalism, with its attention to structural variables such as class position and mediating entities like political parties and unions, provides a nuanced lens through which to study the formation and construction of the government in Iran.
The research methodology, a dual-pronged approach, employs the content analysis method to scrutinize definitions of the modern state put forth by Western thinkers. This analytical approach, eschewing the exploration of attitudes and beliefs in favor of dissecting produced messages, is complemented by the historical research method. This method involves a meticulous examination of specific past events within a defined temporal scope, integrating historical facts through a rigorous regimen of data collection, evaluation, and verification.
Tracing the historical trajectory of government formation in the West, political scientists posit that the foundations of the modern state or nation-state were laid in the late Middle Ages, influenced by the Catholic cultural context. The formation of modern national states was shaped by factors such as religious reform movements and conflicts among European countries. The Treaty of Westphalia in the 16th to 18th centuries is considered a pivotal event in the emergence of the modern state. From the 19th century onward, the modern government model gradually supplanted other political systems globally.
The indicators and criteria of modern governments encompass a legitimate monopoly on controlling the means of violence, a specific territorial territory, sovereignty, centralized power, a codified constitution, the use of impersonal power, nationalism, a public bureaucracy, authority/legitimacy, citizenship, and provincial tax.
The historical exploration of government formation in Iran reveals nuanced epochs, beginning with the Safavid era's establishment of a robust central government to counter threats from the Sunni Ottoman Empire. Shah Abbas I marked a zenith, unifying the country politically, relocating the capital to Isfahan, fostering a unified religious identity based on Shiite Islam, and expanding diplomatic relations. Subsequent governments, such as the Afshariya and Zand, did not significantly alter national and state organizations. The Qajar dynasty witnessed an expansion of central government power, albeit rooted in the Illyrian system. The constitutional revolution of 1285 emerged as a historical turning point, ushering in constitutionalism and paving the way for a more structured political system in Iran. The subsequent Pahlavi absolute government, while characterized by economic nationalism and centralization of power, laid the foundations for absolute rule.
In conclusion, this historical exploration, spanning from the Safavid era to the Pahlavi period, unveils Iran's trajectory of independent political thought and the evolution of a nation transitioning to citizenship. Constitutionalism emerges as the cornerstone of modern governance, establishing a balanced relationship between the government and the nation. The era of Reza Shah, marked by economic nationalism and the consolidation of government power, signifies a fundamental shift, laying the groundwork for absolute rule. This scholarly endeavor sheds light on the nuanced tapestry of Iran's political evolution.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
- Modern State
- Historical institutionalism
- Government
- Constitutional revolution
- Reza Shah
)