نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری علوم سیاسی دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران، ایران.
2 استاد علوم سیاسی دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران، ایران.
چکیده
تأثیر متقابل بین نهادها و قواعد شناختی در شکل دادن به مشروعیت سیاسی، جنبه ای محوری و در عین حال پیچیده در درک تحولات سیاسی است. این مقاله به بررسی این رابطه پیچیده در چارچوب تحولات سیاسی ایران - از سلطنت پهلوی تا ظهور جمهوری اسلامی - می‌پردازد و پویایی‌های دگرگون‌کننده و پیامدهای آن را آشکار میکند. این تحقیق در هسته خود به دنبال پاسخ به این سوال اساسی است: روابط متقابل قواعد شناختی و نهادها، چگونه با اثرگذاری بر مشروعیت وتحولات سیاسی، موجب انقلاب اسلامی ایران شد؟ پاسخ به این سوال به درک عمیق‌تر فرآیندها، رفتارها و پویایی‌های سیاسی رخ داده در انقلاب کمک میکند. هدف این تحقیق بررسی نحوه تعامل قواعد شناختی با ساختارهای نهادی و ارتباط آن با مشروعیت سیاسی و همچنین درک پیچیدگی‌های تحولات سیاسی و وقوع انقلاب است. روش این پژوهش کیفی و تفسیری-تحلیلی است. تحلیل با ترسیم ساختار نهادی ذیل حکومت پهلوی آغاز می‌شود که از ویژگیهای آن، اقتدار متمرکز و تحمیل قواعد شناختی سکولار و غرب‌گرا است. این پس‌زمینه، بستر را برای درک فرسایش مشروعیت ناشی از نارضایتی‌های عمومی، نابرابری‌های اجتماعی-اقتصادی و به حاشیه رانده شدن ارزش‌های سنتی و میل اجتماعی برای تغییرات دگرگون‌کننده فراهم میکند. در میان نارضایتی های اجتماعی، انقلاب اسلامی به عنوان نقطه عطفی ظهور کرد که هم چارچوب‌های نهادی و هم قواعد شناختی را تغییر میدهد. ماهیت دگرگون‌کننده تغییرات قواعد شناختی در این دوره در شکل‌دهی برداشت‌ها از مشروعیت سیاسی بسیار مهم است.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
Interrelationships of institutions and cognitive rules and its effect on political legitimacy; Case study: Iranian revolution and change of government from Pahlavi to Islamic Republic
نویسندگان [English]
- Ali Nanvayi 1
- Mohammad Bagher Khorramshad 2
1 PhD student, Department of Political Science, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran.
2 Professor, Department of Political Science, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده [English]
The interaction between institutions and cognitive rules in shaping political legitimacy is a central and yet complex aspect in understanding political developments. This article examines this complex relationship in the context of Iran's political developments - from the Pahlavi dynasty to the rise of the Islamic Republic - and reveals its transformative dynamics and consequences. In its core, this research seeks to answer this basic question: How did the mutual relations of cognitive rules and institutions, by influencing the legitimacy and political developments, cause the Islamic Revolution of Iran? The answer to this question helps to understand more deeply the political processes, behaviors and dynamics that occurred in the revolution. The purpose of this research is to investigate the interaction of cognitive rules with institutional structures and its relationship with political legitimacy, as well as to understand the complexities of political developments and the occurrence of revolution. The method of this research is qualitative and interpretive-analytical. The analysis begins by drawing the institutional structure under the Pahlavi government, which is characterized by centralized authority and the imposition of secular and Western cognitive rules. This background provides the platform for understanding the erosion of legitimacy caused by public discontent, socio-economic inequalities and the marginalization of traditional values and social desire for transformative changes. In the midst of social dissatisfaction, the Islamic Revolution emerged as a turning point that changes both institutional frameworks and cognitive rules. The transformative nature of cognitive rule changes in this period is very important in shaping perceptions of political legitimacy. This abstract provides a window into the dynamic interplay between power structures, social beliefs, and the evolution of governance paradigms. In the complex landscape of political evolution and transformation, the interaction between institutions and cognitive rules is a crucial determining factor for the legitimacy of a state and government. The relationship between these two pillars explains the complex table of social beliefs, institutional structures and their collective impact on the legitimacy of a political system.
This article examines this ambiguous relationship and extracts insights from the developments that occurred during the 1957 Iranian revolution. Focusing on the paradigm shift from the Pahlavi monarchy to the establishment of the Islamic Republic, this case study provides a lens to explore how the intersection of institutional configurations and transformations of cognitive rules that shape the essence of political legitimacy.
The Pahlavi era, with its centralized authority, provides a context based on which the evolution of institutions and cognitive rules can be examined. The erosion of social trust, caused by dissatisfaction with the government, cultural conflicts and socio-economic inequalities, paved the way for a revolutionary transformation that sought to redefine governance paradigms.
In the midst of this social turmoil, the Islamic Revolution emerged as a transformative force and caused a huge transformation in the institutional frameworks and social beliefs. The overthrow of the Pahlavi government not only meant a change in leadership, but also a restructuring of the government model, based on Islamic principles.
The center of this study is the central role of cognitive rules, which are the dominant social beliefs, values and narratives that underlie society's collective understanding of authority and government. The revolution brought the message of the revival of Islamic values and changed the structure of social norms and political institutions, thus redefining the lines of political legitimacy in Iran.
In this narrative, it becomes clear that the alignment between institutional structures and ruling cognitive rules plays a central role in granting legitimacy to political systems. The integration of religious authority in the governmental framework, which is an example of the emergence of the Islamic Republic, emphasizes the importance of this alignment in consolidating the legitimacy of a new political order.
This article aims to describe these transformative dynamics and investigates the complexities of how institutions and cognitive rules are intertwined and influence the perceived legitimacy of political systems. By learning from the historical metamorphosis of Iran's regime, we seek to gain broader insights into the dynamics of political transitions and its impact on the complex fabric of political legitimacy.
In this research, we are looking for an answer to this basic question: How did the interrelationships of cognitive rules and institutions, by influencing the legitimacy and political developments, cause the Islamic Revolution of Iran? The answer to this question helps to understand the political processes, behaviors and dynamics that occurred in the revolution. The purpose of this research is to investigate the interaction of cognitive rules with institutional structures and its relationship with political legitimacy, as well as to understand the complexities of political developments and the occurrence of revolution.
According to the topic and problem, the type of the current research is developmental. In other words, the development of knowledge considering the weaknesses that exist in this field, especially in political science, has been considered by the authors of the article. Based on this, the analytical-interpretive research method is used as a basis. Research information and data have also been collected using available library documents and resources. The research method used in this article includes qualitative analysis that is rooted in historical narratives, scientific literature, and socio-political analysis. By carefully examining historical documents, scientific works and socio-political discourses, a comprehensive understanding of the mutual relations between institutions, cognitive rules and their impact on political legitimacy in the framework of the Islamic Revolution of Iran is created. This qualitative approach provides the possibility of a detailed examination of the historical path and describes the evolution of political institutions, social beliefs and their collective impact on political legitimacy. The use of qualitative data sources facilitates an in-depth examination of the multifaceted dynamics shaping political transformations and provides insights for understanding the complexities of governance paradigms and social ideals.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
- Cognitive rules
- institutional structure
- political legitimacy
- Islamic revolution of Iran
- Islamic Republic of Iran
- Pahlavi government
)