نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استاد علوم سیاسی دانشگاه رازی، کرمانشاه، ایران

2 دکتری علوم سیاسی دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

چکیده

اگرچه حکومت تاریخی به درازنای زیست بشری دارد، اما دولت پدیده نسبتاً جدیدی است که به‌ویژه در قالب مدرن آن، بیش از چند قرن از عمر آن نمی‌گذرد. دولت مدرن سازمانی است که خشونت قانونی را کنترل و آن را به صورتی مشروع اعمال می‌کند. دولت تنها سازمانی است که صلاحیت و حق اعمال خشونت مشروع را دارد. در طول تاریخ و طی دوران گذشته، دولت‌های زیادی در اقصی نقاط جهان شکل‌گرفته و هر یک بنا به دلایل مختلفی بعد از مدتی به نقطه فروپاشی رسیده‌اند. باوجودی که دولت در مقایسه با حکومت از دوام و بقای بیشتری برخوردار است و به عبارتی، «کم‌وبیش دائمی» است، اما نظریه­پردازان سیاست اغلب چگونگی شکل­گیری دولت‌ها را موردتوجه قرار می­دهند، ولی این نکته که آن‌ها تحت چه شرایطی از هم فرومی‌پاشند، کم‌تر مورد توجه پژوهشگران واقع‌ شده است. هدف این مقاله پاسخ به این پرسش است که در تحت چه شرایطی، یک دولت می‌تواند از بین رفته و یا از هم فروبپاشد؟ در تلاش برای یافتن زمینه‌ها و عوامل فروپاشی و سقوط دولت‌ها، پژوهش حاضر با بهره‌گیری از چارچوب نظری تحلیل سیستمی، ضمن تشریح اشکال مختلف فروپاشی دولت، علل و دلایل مختلفی  را در سطوح داخلی و خارجی مورد تبیین و تحلیل قرار داده است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Conceptual Analysis of the Collapse of the State; In the Context of Systemic Analysis

نویسندگان [English]

  • Masoud Akhavan Kazemi 1
  • Golnaz Narimani 2

1 Professor, Department of Political Science, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran

2 PhD, Department of Political Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

چکیده [English]

A few historical governments have existed for a long time, but the government is relatively old and lasts up to a few centuries, especially in its modern form. A modern government is an organization that controls legal law and applies it legitimately. The government is the only organization with the authority and right to use legitimate violence. Throughout history and during the past eras, many governments have been formed in all parts of the world, and each of them has reached the point of collapse after some time. Although the existence of the state is more durable and survival compared to the government, and in other words, it is "more or less than ever," the specific policies of the formation of the states are taken into consideration. However, the point is under what conditions they fall apart; it has received less attention from researchers. This article aims to answer the question, under what conditions can a government be destroyed or collapsed?
To find the causes and factors of the collapse and fall of governments, the current research, using the theories of systemic analysis, besides explaining the various forms of government collapse, examines all the internal and external factors and factors of the collapse of a government. To understand this issue, it has been taken from systemic analysis; systemic analysis refers to a point of view that can be used to investigate and analyze a phenomenon. Systemic analysis leads to a better understanding of phenomena and avoids reductionism. In recent decades, system analysis has been proposed as an efficient tool for new sciences and specialized supplementary studies in various social fields in scientific and academic circles. This causes a general and multifaceted understanding of why and the phenomena and events governing behavioral affairs.
In systemic analysis, the political system, as an intellectual system, has several subsystems. A crisis in any of these subsystems, including the economic or political subsystem, can lead to the fragility and collapse of the government. In this view, the government is a set of interconnected and systematic elements and propositions. Disruption in any of these elements can lead to the collapse or destruction of the state.
In addition to the internal connection between its components, the government as a system also has a connection with external changes at different and numerous levels. The state has the property of food with its external elements. As a result of these connections between the government and the environment and the actions and reactions between them, differences or imbalances occur in the government system.
In a general classification, the collapse and disintegration of governments can be classified in the form of two main categories—external factors and factors and internal factors. External factors deal with the relations between the government and other countries in the international community. The second category also refers to the relationship between the government and its internal society. It is essential to mention that these two groups of factors influence each other, and a change in the intensity and weakness of one causes a change in the intensity and weakness of the other. This means that the collapse of the government extends from the internal situation to the foreign relations of the troubled government. Also, the weakening of foreign authority substantially impacts its internal stability.
Research studies indicate that at the external level of the government system, essential factors such as war and foreign invasion, climate change, the pressures of powers and economic sanctions, and issues of a succession of governments can become the fragility of the government and against it. It will eventually collapse. In the internal dimension, crises in three subsystems, political, economic, and social, can turn into the collapse of the government. In other words, factors such as political crises and the distortion of governance, economic crises such as inflation and damage, and social issues such as the crisis of failure to start and the crisis of participation are the main factors affecting the collapse and disintegration of a government. The weakening, incapacity, decline, and decay of governments either due to external factors, in the economic forms of political policies and foreign invasion and war, and in some cases, due to climate change and the succession of governments to another place. It occurs or results from internal changes in the political, economic, and social structure, civil wars, accumulation of crises, and loss of internal legitimacy.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Systemic Analysis
  • State Collapse
  • Fragile States
  • Government
  • Sovereignty
  1. فارسی

    1. ابراهیمی، یعقوب. (1394). نگاه ساختارگرا به شکنندگی دولت‌ها‌ در جهان اسلام، زمین در گستره سیاست، فرهنگ و فلسفه، شماره ششم، ص 4-15.
    2. آراسته خواه، محمد. (1388). فرهنگ اصطلاحات علمی، اجتماعی، تهران: چاپخش.
    3. اسلامیان، سعید، اخروی، سعید. (1394). نگاهی کمی به پدیده تغییر اقلیم و راهکارهای سازش با آن، سال سوم، جلد 8.
    4. بشیریه، حسین. (1386).گذار به مردمسالاری، تهران: نشر نگاه معاصر.
    5. زرقانی و دیگران. (1391). تغییرات آب و هوایی و نقش آن در امنیت پایدار، مجموعه مقالات همایش ملی جغرافیای سیاسی کاربردی، تهران.
    6. صالحی، صادق، پازوکی نژاد، زهرا. (1395). تغییر آب و هوا؛ تهدید صلح و امنیت جهانی: رویکرد جامعه شناختی، میراث فرهنگی و گردشگری، دوره اول، سال دوم، شماره 3.
    7. قاسمی، فرهاد. (1384). اصول روابط بین الملل، تهران: نشر میزان.
    8. قوام، َعبدالعلی. (1392). سیاست های مقایسه ای، تهران: سمت.
    9. کا. لی، ربکا. اس. (1383). مسیرهای منتهی به فروپاشی دولت: تلاش در جهت دستیابی به مدل تلفیقی از هم پاشیدگی سرزمین، ترجمه: احمد شکرچی، پژوهشنامه علوم انسانی، شماره 41-42.
    10. کولایی، الهه، اکبری، زیبا. (1396). دولت شکننده در عراق و امنیت زنان، سیاست، دوره 47، شماره 1.
    11. نوریان، محمد علی. (1394). ریشه ها و پیامد های همسایگی با دولت های ورشکسته: افغانستان و شکست دولت – ملت سازی و صلح، علوم سیاسی، سال یازدهم، شماره 31، ص 124.
    12. نیاکویی، سید امیر؛ پیرمحمدی، سعید. (1399). گذار از دولت به شبه دولت در عراق و سوریه پس از بیداری اسلامی، دولت پژوهی، سال 6، شماره 24، زمستان.
    13. یزدان فام، محمود. (1388). دولت های شکننده و امنیت انسانی، مطالعات راهبردی، سال دوازدهم، شماره چهارم.

    Refrences

    1. Cament, David and Samy Yiagadesen. (2009). Extent and Sources of State Fragility and Failure: Core Factors in Fragility and Failure, cifp, Available at: www.carleton.ca/cifp/.../ffs_data_methodology.php.
    2. Clapham, C. (1996). Africa and the International System: the politics of state survival. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    3. Clément, Caty. (2005). The Nuts and Bolts of State Collapse: Common Causes and Different Patterns? A QCA Analysis of Lebanon, Somalia and the Former-Yugoslavia, COMPASSS Working Paper WP200, 5-32.
    4. Cojanu, Valentin, Popescu, Alina Irina. (2007). Analysis of Failed States: Some Problems of Definition and Measurement, The Romanian Economic Journal, Year X, no. 25 bis.
    5. Daniel Lambach, Eva Johais, Markus Bayer. (2015). The Causes of State Collapse: Results from a QCA Analysis, COMPASSS Working Paper 2015-80, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Institut für Politikwissenschaft, Available at http://www.compasss.org/wpseries/ Lambach J ohaisBayer2015.pdf.
    6. David Carment, Stewart Prest and Yiagadeesen Samy. (2010).Security, Development and Fragile State: Bridging the Gap between Theory and Policy (London and New York: Routledge, 84-89.
    7. Filatova, I. (2000). Democracy versus State: the African dilemma, in The Consolidation of Democracy in Africa, edited by Solomon, H. & Liebenberg, I. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishers.
    8. Goldstone, Jack. (1991). Revolution and Rebellion in the Early Modem World. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
    9. Howard, Tiffiany. (2014). Failed States and the Origins of Violence, Routledge.
    10. IQBAL, ZARYAB, HARVEY STARR. (2008). Bad Neighbors: Failed States and Their Consequences: Conflict Management and Peace Science, 25:315–331. [In Persian]
    11. Kaenfer, William H. and Lowenberg, Anton D. (1992). International Economic Sanctions: A Public Choice Perspective, boulder: westview, PP. 2.
    12. Kreijen, Gerard. (2004). “State Failure, Sovereignty and Effectiveness”, Netherlands, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
    13. Lawson, K. (1997). The Human Polity, 4th ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
    14. Pinar Bilgan and Adam David Morton. (2002). “Historicising Representations of ‘failed states’: Beyond the Cold-War Annexation of the Social Sciences?”  Third World Quarterly, 23, No 1, pp 56.
    15. Rotberg, R (Ed). (2004). When States Fail, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. [In Persian]
    16. ROTBERG, ROBERT I (2004). The Failure and Collapse of Nation-States BREAKDOWN, PREVENTION, AND REPAIR, Princeton University press.
    17. Rotberg, Robert. (2003). “Failed States, Collapsed States, Weak States: Causes and Indicators”, in State Failure and State Weakness in a Time of Terror, ed. Robert I. Rotberg Washington D. C.: Brookings Institution.
    18. Thürer, D. (1999). “The Failed State and International Law”, Int’l Rev Red Cross
    19. Ulfelder, Jay. (2012). “State Failure” Has Failed. How About Giving “State Collapse” a Whirl? http://dartthrowingchimp.wordpress.com/2012/07/05/state-failure-hasfailed-how-about-giving-state-collapse-a-whirl/.