نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

استادیار علوم سیاسی و روابط بین‌الملل پژوهشکده فرهنگ و ارتباطات دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران، ایران.

چکیده

مقاله حاضر با رویکرد تحلیلی و کاربردی به بررسی سند جامع دولت الکترونیک جمهوری اسلامی ایران از منظر شاخص‌ها و مؤلفه‌های دولت دیجیتالی و نیز حکمرانی داده می‌پردازد. در بخش نخست، مقاله ضرورت توجه به تحول دیجیتالی و مقوله حکمرانی داده و تأثیر آن‌ها بر فرایندهای دولتی تبیین می‌شود. در ادامه، اجزای اصلی حکمرانی داده به‌منظور کاربرد تحول دیجیتالی در دولت الکترونیک مدنظر قرار می‌گیرند. در این راستا، ابعاد گوناگون حکمرانی داده همانند حفاظت از داده‌ها، فرایندهای داده‌ای، قوانین، استانداردها و شاخص‌های مرتبط تحلیل می‌گردند. سپس، سند جامع دولت الکترونیک جمهوری اسلامی ایران از منظر مؤلفه‌های دولت دیجیتالی و با تأکید بر حکمرانی داده‌ها ارزیابی می‌شود. در این خصوص، مؤلفه‌هایی همانند دگرگونی خدمات دولتی، توجه به رویکردهای کاربر محور و داده محور، ایجاد ابر دولتی، وضوح بیشتر و شفاف‌سازی فرایندها و اتخاذ رویکردهای مرتبط با داده (مدیریت کیفیت داده، مدیریت امنیت و حفاظت داده، مدیریت محتوا و انباره‌های داده‌ای، مدیریت فرایندهای پایگاه داده) تأکید می‌گردند. در پایان، پیشنهاد‌هایی برای بهبود فرایندهای حکمرانی داده در کشور با تأکید بر مؤلفه‌های دولت دیجیتالی ارائه می‌شوند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Analyzing the Comprehensive Electronic Government Document of the Islamic Republic of Iran from the Perspective of Digital Government and Data Governance Indicators

نویسنده [English]

  • Faramarz Sahraei

Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science and International Relations, Faculty of Research Institute of Culture and Communication, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran

چکیده [English]

Digital transformation is one of the new areas that is key in almost all innovation and change processes which has been adopted by institutions and organizations due to its positive effects on increasing workflow efficiency and reducing errors, improving performance and quality productivity and, as a result, increasing customer satisfaction, this term has been considered in different fields and sectors. Despite all the advantages of using new technologies, the digitization of various departments of organizations has faced many challenges to governments. On the one hand, the rapid growth of technologies and the management of data generated in new environments have caused changes in many government processes. Data protection and citizens' privacy are among the issues that need to be given more attention in the transformation of the digital government. This article, with an analytical and applied approach, examines the comprehensive electronic government document of the Islamic Republic of Iran from the perspective of indicators and components of the digital government as well as data governance. In the first part, the article explains the need to pay attention to digital transformation and the category of data governance and their impact on government processes. In the following, the main components of data governance are considered in order to apply digital transformation in e-government. In this regard, various dimensions of data governance such as data protection, data processes, laws, standards and related indicators are analyzed. Then, the comprehensive electronic government document of the Islamic Republic of Iran is evaluated from the perspective of the components of the digital government and with an emphasis on data governance. In this regard, components such as the transformation of government services, paying attention to user-oriented and data-oriented approaches, creating a government cloud, greater clarity and transparency of processes and adopting data-related approaches (data quality management, data security and protection management, content management and data warehouses, database process management) are emphasized. In the end, suggestions for improving data governance processes in the country are presented, emphasizing the components of digital government. In general, digital transformation has changed the expectations of governments and led to user-centric and data-centric approaches. Digital transformation does not mean only the digitization of resources and services; rather, transformation should be made in all goals, processes, procedures and structures. Considering the role of transformation and digital transformation in the development of governments, in this article, it is suggested to formulate a comprehensive and integrated data governance strategy based on data governance maturity models. It is necessary to adopt new strategies to protect, manage and develop data as a valuable organizational asset. Reviewing and updating proposed laws, regulations or policies related to electronic transactions, digital signatures and identification and leveraging digital technologies to bring together stakeholders from all levels of government and outside government to deliver better outcomes and develop individual and collective capacities to strengthen the impact of digital government Digital government is another necessity. In general, digital transformation has changed the expectations of governments and led to user-centric and data-centric approaches. Digital transformation does not mean only the digitization of resources and services; rather, transformation should be made in all goals, processes, procedures and structures. Considering the role of transformation and digital transformation in the development of governments, in this article, it is suggested to formulate a comprehensive and integrated data governance strategy based on data governance maturity models. It is necessary to adopt new strategies to protect, manage and develop data as a valuable organizational asset. Reviewing and updating proposed laws, regulations or policies related to electronic transactions, digital signatures and identification and leveraging digital technologies to bring together stakeholders from all levels of government and outside government to deliver better outcomes and develop individual and collective capacities to strengthen the impact of digital government Digital government is another necessity. The use of data governance models requires coherent and strategic planning for the use of digital technologies in all areas and at all administrative levels. Governments must ensure that their risk management capabilities, norms, structures and models are aligned with their digital government strategic vision. It is essential that governments also understand the level of organizational maturity of the public sector in relation to project management methods and approaches and can achieve appropriate levels of maturity in digital government investment. The failure of governments to transition to the new digital environment can have significant consequences, including poor service delivery, inadequate distribution of funds, privacy violations, security breaches, and loss of citizen trust. For this reason, effective digital government strategies must be responsive to public expectations in terms of economic and social value, data openness, innovation, personalized service delivery, and dialogue with business citizens.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Data Governance
  • Digital Transformation
  • E-government
  • E-government Comprehensive Document
  • Digital Transformation Indicators
الف) فارسی
اعتمادی، کتایون و مهدی‌پور، پروین. (1388). بررسی الگوهای دولت الکترونیک و مدل‌های ارزیابی آمادگی دولت الکترونیک در کشورهای درحال‌توسعه. کنفرانس شهر الکترونیک. دوره دوم.
بنیادی، سحر؛ حریری، نجلا؛ طاهری، سیدمهدی و پورنقی، رویا (زودآیند). ارایه مدل مدیریت کیفیت داده برای حکمرانی داده با استفاده از روش فراترکیب. پژوهشنامه پردازش و مدیریت اطلاعات.
بیک‌زاد، جعفر و جلیلی نژاد، قاسم (1400). آسیب شناسی حکمرانی دیجیتال در دولت الکترونیک. نخبگان علوم و مهندسی، 6(6): 17-33.
جهانگیری، علی (1381). دولت الکترونیکی. مدیری توسعه، شماره 55.
زینالی صومعه، پروانه؛ پورعزت، علی‌اصغر و دودانگه، پروین. (1392). کارکردهای استقرار دولت الکترونیک در ایران (مورد مطالعه: بانکداری الکترونیک). آینده پژوهی مدیریت (پژوهش های مدیریت). 24(99): 55-70.
ستادریا رئیسی دهکردی، شهرام (1401). استقرار نظام دولت الکترونیک راهکاری برای مقابله با فساد اداری. همایش ملی ارتقای شفافیت. دوره اول.
صفری، معصومه و بابایی، محمدرضا. (1394). دولت الکترونیک در عصر مجازی. کنفرانس بین‌المللی پژوهش‌های نوین در مدیریت، اقتصاد و حسابداری. دوره دوم.
فرج‌پهلو، عبدالحسین و بصیری، ساسان. (1385). اصول طراحی درگاه دولت الکترونیک. تحول اداری. 9(51): 93-131.
فرزانه کندری، نرگس و روحانی، سعید (1399). ارائه چارچوب مفهومی تحول دیجیتال قضایی در راستای حکمرانی دیجیتال. مدیریت دولتی، 12(4): 695-722.
مرادی مقدم، حسین. (1401).،حکمرانی داده و نقش آن در توسعه برنامه ریزی شهری، چهارمین همایش ملی مدیریت دانش و کسب و کارهای الکترونیکی با رویکرد اقتصاد مقاومتی، مشهد.
مقدسی، علیرضا. (1384). مدل پیاده‌سازی دولت الکترونیک. تدبیر. 16(160).
نوری، مژگان؛ شاه‌حسینی، محمدعلی؛ شامی زنجانی، مهدی و عابدین، بابک (1400). طراحی چارچوب مفهومی رهبری تحول دیجیتال در سازمان‌های ایرانی. مدیریت و برنامه‌ریزی در نظام‌های آموزشی، 12(2): 211-241.
یعقوبی، اسماعیل (1396). حکمرانی خوب و ارتقای سلامت نظام اداری؛ تبیین نقش دولت الکترونیک. پژوهش‌های مدیریت عمومی، ص: 203-222.
ب) انگلیسی
Algazo, F. A., Ibrahim, S., & Yusoff, W. S. (2021). Digital governance emergence and importance. Management, 6(24), 18-26.
Bair, J. (2004). Practical Data Quality: Sophistication Levels. Accessed October, 21, 2022.
Barker, J. M. (2016). Data Governance: the missing approach to improving data quality. University of Phoenix.
Benfeldt, O., Persson, J. S., & Madsen, S. (2020). Data governance as a collective action problem. Information Systems Frontiers, 22(2), 299-313.
Borkar, V., Carey, M. J., & Li, C. (2012, March). Inside" Big Data management" ogres, onions, or parfaits? In Proceedings of the 15th international conference on extending database technology (pp. 3-14).
Bozkurt, Y., Rossmann, A., & Pervez, Z. (2022, January). A Literature Review of Data Governance and Its Applicability to Smart Cities. In Proceedings of the 55th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
Chamberlain, A. (2013). Using Aspects of Data Governance Frameworks to Manage Big Data as an Asset, a PhD thesis at University of Oregon.
Cheong, L. K., & Chang, V. (2007). The need for data governance: a case study. ACIS 2007 proceedings, 100.
Cohen, R (2006). BI Strategy: What's in a Name? Data Governance Roles, Responsibilities and Results Factors. DM Review,
Dai, W., Wardlaw, I., Cui, Y., Mehdi, K., Li, Y., & Long, J. (2016). Data profiling technology of data governance regarding big data: review and rethinking. Information Technology: New Generations, 439-450.
Jahangiri, Ali (2002). Electronic government. Development Management, 55.
Kale, V. (2019). Digital transformation of enterprise architecture. CRC Press.
Koltay, T. (2016). Data governance, data literacy and the management of data quality. IFLA journal, 42(4), 303-312.
Kuzio, J., Ahmadi, M., Kim, K. C., Migaud, M. R., Wang, Y. F., & Bullock, J. (2022). Building better global data governance. Data & Policy, 4, e25.
Lin, W. L., Yip, N., Ho, J. A., & Sambasivan, M. (2020). The adoption of technological innovations in a B2B context and its impact on firm performance: An ethical leadership perspective. Industrial Marketing Management.
Maheshwari, A. (2019). Digital transformation: Building intelligent enterprises. John Wiley & Sons.
Mayernik, M. S., Breseman, K., Downs, R. R., Duerr, R., Garretson, A., Hou, C. Y. S., & Environmental Data Governance Initiative. (2020). Risk Assessment for Scientific Data. Data Science Journal, 19
Newman, D. & Logan, D. 2006. Governance Is an Essential Building Block for Enterprise Information System. Gartner Research, May
Olson, J (2003). Data Quality: The Accuracy Dimension. Published by Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, USA
Otto, B. (2011). A morphology of the organisation of data governance.
Palmer, N (2019). Digital Transformation with Business Process Management. Future Strategies Inc.
Panian, Z. (2010). Some practical experiences in data governance. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 62(1), 939-946.
Raisi Dehkordi, Shahram (2022). The establishment of electronic government system is a solution to deal with administrative corruption. First National Conference on Promotion of Transparency. [In Persian]
Riggins, F. J., & Klamm, B. K. (2017). Data governance case at KrauseMcMahon LLP in an era of self-service BI and Big Data. Journal of Accounting Education, 38, 23-36.
Saldanha, T. (2019). Why digital transformations fail: The surprising disciplines of how to take off and stay ahead. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Sarsfield, S. (2009). The data governance imperative. IT governance publishing.
Schallmo, A., & Daniel, R. (2018). Digital Transformation Now! Guiding the Successful Digitalization of Your Business Model. Springer Science+ Business Media, LLC.
Schrage, M. (2019). Smart strategies require smarter KPIs. MITSloan Management Review, 16.
Sebastian-Coleman, L. (2022). Meeting the Challenges of Data Quality Management. Elsevier.
Sen, H. (2019). Data Governance: Perspectives and Practices.
Sundberg, L. (2019). Electronic government: Towards e-democracy or democracy at risk? Safety science, 118, 22-32.
Tallon, P. P., Ramirez, R. V., & Short, J. E. (2013). The information artifact in IT governance: Toward a theory of information governance. Journal of Management Information Systems, 30(3), 141-178.
Thomas, G. (2006). The DGI data governance framework. The Data Governance Institute.
Twizeyimana, J. D., & Andersson, A. (2019). The public value of E-Government–A literature review. Government Information Quarterly, 36(2), 167-178.
Wang, C., Medaglia, R., & Zheng, L. (2018). Towards a typology of adaptive governance in the digital government context: The role of decision-making and accountability. Government Information Quarterly, 35(2), 306-322.
Westerman, G., Bonnet, D., & McAfee, A. (2014). Leading digital: Turning technology into business transformation. Harvard Business Press.
Zichichi, M., Ferretti, S., D’Angelo, G., & Rodríguez-Doncel, V. (2022). Data Governance through a Multi-DLT Architecture in View of the GDPR. Cluster Computing, 1-28.