From Zenith to Collapse of the Safavid State: An Analysis within the Framework of North et al.’s Natural State Theory

Ziaei, Mazaher

doi:10.22054/tssq.2026.86287.1670

From Zenith to Collapse of the Safavid State: An Analysis within the Framework of North et al.’s Natural State Theory

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Mazaher Ziaei ^¶

PhD, Department of Industrial Management, Faculty of Administrative Sciences and Economics, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran.

https://doi.org/10.22054/tssq.2026.86287.1670

Abstract

Introduction
The collapse of the Safavid state in 1722, after more than two centuries of rule, remains a central problem in Iranian history. A state that had established a relatively durable political order and reached a high point under Shah Abbas I was defeated by a comparatively small tribal insurgent force. Existing explanations have emphasized the personal weaknesses of Shah Sultan Husain, the confinement of princes, court extravagance, growing clerical influence, and the declining position of the Qizilbash military. Although these interpretations identify important developments, treating them as separate causes does not fully explain their interactions or why a seemingly enduring order lost the capacity and willingness to defend itself.
This article approaches the Fall of the Safavids through Natural State Theory, developed by Douglass North and his colleagues. In this framework, a natural state is governed by a Dominant Coalition of powerful political, military, economic, and religious actors who cooperate to generate and distribute rents while competing over their allocation. The distribution of economic benefits must remain broadly compatible with the distribution of political power and the capacity for violence. This principle of double balance connects the cohesion of the coalition to the control of violence and offers a framework for considering the longer Development Process.
Research Objective
The study seeks to interpret political and economic changes in the Safavid Dominant Coalition from the death of Shah Abbas I in 1629 to the surrender of Isfahan in 1722. Rather than presenting a list of immediate causes of collapse, it examines how rent generation, the composition of the coalition, the role of the monarch, and the position of the militaries changed across successive reigns. It also considers whether changes in administration, territorial control, and elite organization moved the Safavid state toward more developed forms of the natural state and how the Safavid experience contributed to Iran’s subsequent Development Process.
Research Method
The research employs a qualitative, library-based historical method grounded in the analysis of chronicles, travel accounts, historical documents, and secondary scholarship. Evidence concerning land tenure, taxation, trade, court expenditure, military organization, appointments, rebellions, and relations among elites is interpreted through the concepts of Natural State Theory.
The analysis follows the reigns of Shah Safi I, Shah Abbas II, Shah Suleyman, and Shah Sultan Husain, while using the political and economic configuration inherited from Shah Abbas I as its point of comparison. It also compares the initial formation, consolidation, and subsequent weakening of the Safavid Dominant Coalition. The approach is interpretive: it reconstructs relationships between incentives, rents, and violence rather than claiming to estimate their causal effects statistically.
Research Findings
At the end of Shah Abbas I’s reign, the Safavid Dominant Coalition combined a powerful monarch with tribal commanders, salaried military forces, provincial governors, bureaucrats, religious authorities, and a more limited presence of merchants and other specialists. Reforms had reduced the exclusive position of Qizilbash commanders, increased the role of royal military slaves, expanded crown lands, and strengthened central administration. Military and economic interests were sufficiently balanced to sustain a substantial flow of rents, limit elite conflict, and support internal security.
Under Shah Safi I and Shah Abbas II, disputes and royal violence did not destroy this arrangement. Considerable economic resources, continuing trade, and an established administrative apparatus helped preserve the coalition despite periodic struggles over appointments and authority.
Over time, however, the internal distribution of influence shifted. The palace establishment, especially the eunuchs, and the Shiite religious authorities acquired increasing power; bureaucrats also initially benefited from centralization. By contrast, the political standing, salaries, and numbers of military forces declined.
Under Shah Suleyman, court actors increasingly influenced succession and important decisions, while the monarch’s role as an arbiter among the members of the Dominant Coalition weakened. Under Shah Sultan Husain, the king became primarily associated with the interests of the palace and influential clerics rather than acting as a guarantor of the coalition as a whole. Militaries lost both material incentives and influence over collective decisions, while rivalry among courtiers, clerics, administrators, and commanders impeded effective responses to threats.
The decline in the resources available to coalition members intensified these tensions. The proliferation of elite households and positions increased the number of claimants to rents. Rising palace expenditure, fiscal exactions, insecurity on trade routes, pressure on agricultural producers, and disruptions to commerce reduced or strained the revenues that could be distributed. Because land-related revenues formed the principal fiscal foundation of the state, expanding expenditure could not easily be financed by equivalent growth in income.
The resulting decline in rents per coalition member undermined cooperation and upset the double balance between economic rewards and political or military influence. Some salaried soldiers turned to extortion or predation, while tribal forces retained the capacity to mobilize violence outside effective central control.
The Ghilzai uprising exposed rather than independently created the breakdown of the Dominant Coalition. Provincial and tribal actors could anticipate greater benefits from rebellion than from maintaining the existing order. During the approach to and siege of Isfahan, competition within the Safavid leadership obstructed military coordination. Some elite members regarded the attackers as a potential means of reallocating offices and rents rather than as an existential threat to their collective position.
Consequently, the Safavid state collapsed without an effective unified defense, and the conquerors were unable to establish an immediately durable replacement coalition.
Conclusion
Natural State Theory helps explain the Fall of the Safavids as the outcome of a cumulative deterioration in the political and economic foundations of the Dominant Coalition, not simply the personal failings of the last shah or the military superiority of the insurgents. The weakening of the monarch’s coordinating role, the uneven redistribution of power, declining rents per member, and the persistence of independently capable tribal forces jointly made the coalition increasingly fragile.
The Safavid period nevertheless featured developments relevant to the Development Process, including reduced internal warfare, expanded bureaucracy, greater centralization, and a wider range of participating elites. These advances did not establish the conditions for a basic or mature natural state, particularly because coercive organizations remained fragmented and reliable constraints on rulers and elite relations were limited.
At the same time, the Safavids’ prolonged rule over much of Iran and their contribution to political integration provided an important historical foundation for later state formation. The Iranian case also points to a limitation in explanations derived mainly from European experience: repeated pressure from mobile, armed tribal groups could reverse institutional consolidation and reproduce fragile natural states even after significant periods of centralization.

Keywords

Fall of the Safavids

Natural State Theory

Militaries

Dominant Coalition

Development Process

Subjects

The State

Abrahamian, E. (2010). Essays on Iranian Sociology, some essays of Iran between two revolutions translated by Soheila Torabi Farsani. Tehran: Pardis-e-Danesh. [In Persian].

Adibi A, Taghavi S M A. (2020). Investigating the Causes of the Fall of the Safavid Government from Ibn Khaldun's Points of View. The History of Islamic Culture and Civilization Quarterly Journal of Research. 11 (38):103-126. [In Persian].

Asif, Mohammad Hashim (Rostam Al-Hokama), (1977). Rostam al-Tawarikh. Tehran: Ketabhayeh Jibi. [In Persian].

Bakhshi Ostad M A, Heidari A R. (2021). Social Order in the Safavid State with Emphasis on North's Theory of the Fragile Natural State. Journal of Historical Sociology. 13 (1), 1-46. [In Persian].

Banani, Amin (1998). Reflections on the social and economic structure of Iran at the height of the Safavids era. Translated by Mohammad Ali Ranjbar, Political and Economic Ettela’at, 136-135, 44-55. [In Persian].

Bastani Partzi, Mohammad Ibrahim (1978), Iran under the Safvids: Economic and Political conditions. Tehran: Safialishah. [In Persian].

Bigdali, Mohsen (1400). Finding the roots of the decline of the Safavid state. Tehran: Research Institute of Humanities and Cultural Studies. [In Persian].

Chardin, Jean (1345). Voyages de Chardin 's Tome VIII, translated by Mohammad Abbasi, Tehran: Amirkabir. [In Persian].

Garthwaite, G. R. (1991). The Persians. Translated by Alireza Babaei, Tehran: Akhtaran. [In Persian].

Gharakhani, S., Renani, M., Karimi, Z., & Momeni, F. (2021). Iran with Natural State (Case Study of Pahlavi II). Economic Growth and Development Research, 11(42), 184-155. [In Persian].

Gilanentz P. S. (1992). The fall of Isfahan, translated by Mohammad Mehriyar, Isfahan: Golha Publication. [In Persian].

Hazin, Muhammad Ali (1953). Tarikh-e-Hazin, Isfahan: Taa’yed. [In Persian].

Hosseini, Abulfazl (2011). The causes and factors of the fall of the Safavid dynasty, Farhang Isfahan, 24: 60-68[In Persian].

Ibn Khaldoun, Abdul Rahman (1983). Ibn Khaldoun's introduction, V. 1, translated by Mohammad Parveen Gonabadi, Tehran: Elmi-Farhani [In Persian].

Jafarian, Rasul. (2005). The Safavids in the arenas of religion, culture and politics, second volume, Tehran: Research Institute of Hawzah & University. [In Persian].

Kaempfer, Engelbert, (1994). Am hofe des persischen grosskonigs (1684-85), translated by Keykavous Jahandari, Tehran: Kharazmi. [In Persian].

Kajbaf, A., Mansoorian, M., & Foroughi, A. (2018). Explaining and Analyzing Population Status and the Impact of Agriculture on it in the Safavid Era. Historical Researches, 10(3), 41-59. [In Persian].

Katouzian, Homayun-a. (2017). Iranians from ancient times to the present day. Translated by Hossein Shahidi, Tehran: Nash Karzan.

Katouzian, Homayun-b (2017). Theories of arbitrary rule and the short-term society. Journal of Historical Sociology, 10(2), 1-15. [In Persian].

Kavakbian, Mostafa, and Matin, Azim. (2023). The Formation and Consolidation of the Modern State in Iran. State Studies, 9(36), 281-31. [In Persian].

Keddie, Niki R. (1990). The Roots of the Iranian Revolution, translated by Abdul Rahim Gavahi, Tehran: Qalam Publications. [In Persian].

Khatunabadi, Abdul Hossein (1352). The events of Al-Sunin and Al-Awam, corrected by Mohammad Baqer Behboodi, Tehran: Islamia. [In Persian].

Khonji, Mohammad Ali (1374). The value of the theory of Asian production, Political and Economic Ettela’at, No. 99-100 to 113-114. [In Persian].

Khorami Azadeh, Zahra Karimi Moghari. (2014) Investigating Iran's economic performance in the Safavid era and comparing it with Europe in the 17th century with an institutional approach, Planning and Budgeting Quarterly, 20 (2): 143-180. [In Persian].

Krusinski, J. T. (2023). Histoire De La Dernière Révolution De Perse. Translator: Sasan Tahmasabi, Tehran: Amirkabir. [In Persian].

Lambton, A. K. S. (1984). Landlord and peasant in Persia. Translated by Manouchehr Amiri, Tehran: Center of Scientific and Cultural Publications. [In Persian].

Laravi, Nurullah (2008). Nader the son of the sword. Editor Kobri Razaghi, Tehran: Ketab-e-Parse. [In Persian].

Lokhart, L. (2022). The fall of the Safavi dynasty and the Afghan occupation of Persian, translated by Mustafa Qoli Emad, Tehran: Marvarid. [In Persian].

Luft, P. (2008). Iran unter Schah'Abbas II, translated by Keykavous Jahandari, Tehran: Printing and Publishing Center of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. [In Persian].

Malcolm, J. (2010). The History of Persia. Translated by Mirza Ismail Hiyrat, Tehran: Afsun. [In Persian].

Marashi Safavi, Mohammad Khalil (1983). Majam al-Tawarikh. Tehran: Tahori. [In Persian].

Matthee, R., P. (2019). Persia in Crisis: Safavid Decline and the Fall of Isfahan. Translated by Hassan Afshar, Nashr-e-Markaz. https://taaghche.com/book/158262. [In Persian].

Mostufi. Mohammad Mohsen (1996) Zabdato al-Tawarikh. On the effort of Behrouz Guderzis, Tehran: Muhammed Afshar Yazdi Moqofat Publications. [In Persian].

Naqibzadeh, Ahmed (1386). A comparative study of the evolution of the modern state in the West and Iran, in: Afzali Rasool's effort, Modern state in Iran. p. 163-190 Qom: Mofid University Press. [In Persian].

Nasiri, Mohammad Ebrahim (1373) Shahriaran's order, by the effort of Mohammad Nader Nasiri-Moghadam, Tehran: Dr. Mahmoud Afshar Endowment Foundation

Newman, A. (2015). Safavid Iran: Rebirth of a Persian Empire. Translated by Behzad Karimi »https://taaghche.com/book/12477.

Nomani, Farhad (1979). The evolution of feudalism in Iran. Tehran: Kharazmi. [In Persian].

North (1402). Economic transformation, translated by Daoud Heydari and Mofid Alizadeh, Tehran: Duniya Ekhtaz. [In Persian].

North, D. C., Wallis, J. J. and Weingast B. R. (2017). In the shadow of violence: politics, economy and the problem of development. Translated by Mohsen Mirdamadi and Mohammad Hossein Naimipour, Tehran: Rozneh. [In Persian].

North, D. C., Wallis, J. J. and Weingast B. R. (2018). Violence and social order: a conceptual framework for interpreting human recorded history. Translated by Behnam Zoghi Rudsari, Tehran: Shirazeh. [In Persian].

Pishgahifard, Z., Zaki, Y., Karami, A., & Afzali, R. (2016). An investigation the effect of Nomadism on Iran’s military structure from the Safavid until the late Qajar era. History of Islam and Iran, 26(30), 35-68 [In Persian].

Pourhassan, Naser. (2017). State-Tribe: A Pre-theory for Pre-Pahlavi Iran. State Studies, 3(10), 33-63. [In Persian].

Qashqaienejad, Z., & Aghajari, S. H. (2013). Decline of Money Value in Safavid Era and Its Main Reasons. History of Islam and Iran, 23(18), 1-13. [In Persian].

Qazvini, Ibrahim (1367). Favaye-al-Safawieh, edited by Maryam Mir Ahmadi, Tehran: Institute of Cultural Studies and Research. [In Persian].

Qurbani Hasari, and others. (2015). Confiscation of the property of government officials in Iran during the Islamic period until the end of the Safavid dynasty. Journal of Islamic Civilization History, 49(2), 219-238. [In Persian].

Rajabzadeh, Ahmed (1374). A Structural Analysis of the Development and Interruption Cycles of Islamic Civilization (A Case Study of the Safavid Era), The letter of Research, 4, 49-90. [In Persian].

Rezaqoli, Ali (1402). If North was Iranian. Tehran: Aghaz. [In Persian].

Roemer, H. R. (2001). Pesien auf dem weg in die neuzeit Iranische geschichte von 1350-1750. translated by Azar Ahanchi, Tehran: Tehran University Press. [In Persian].

Rohbern K. M. (1970). Provinzen und zentralgewalt Persein, translated by Keykavous Jahandari, Tehran: Bangah Trjomeh and Nasher Ketab. [In Persian].

Savory, R. (1389), Iran under the Safavids, translated by Kambyz Azizi, Tehran: Nashr-e-Markaz. [In Persian].

Soltanian, A. (2016). The Quality of the Safavids kings’ action towards the farmers and peasant's class. History of Islam and Iran, 26(30), 141-166. [In Persian].

Tavernier, J. B., (1957). Les Six Voyages de Jean Baptiste Tavernier, translated by Abu Torab Nouri, revised and corrected by Hamid Shirani, Isfahan: Sana'i Library and Taa’yed Bookstore. [In Persian].

Vali, Abbas (1380). Pre-capitalist Iran: A Theoretical History. translated by Hasan Shamsavori, Tehran: Nashr-e-markaz. [In Persian].

Ziaei, M. (2023a). Using the Conceptual Framework of »Limited Access Order» to Interpret the Changes in the Sassanid State. Historical Researches, 15(2), 59-7. [In Persian].

Ziaei, M. (2023b). State Instability in Iran (3000 BC to 1600 AD) as Part of Central Asian Interactions with other Regions of Eurasia. State Studies, 9(35), 117-155. [In Persian].