Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 PhD Student, Department of Political Sciences, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, Allameh Tabatabai University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Historians and political scientists have long debated the key influences of the Founding Fathers of the United States in establishing the government and drafting the Constitution. Thinkers like John Locke, Montesquieu, Algernon Sidney, and James Harrington are frequently cited, yet the influence of Machiavelli’s ideas has often been overlooked. Only a few scholars, such as Walter McDougall and John Pocock, have briefly suggested the possibility that the Founding Fathers were influenced by Machiavelli’s ideas, while others, like Anthony DiMaggio, have approached the topic solely from the perspective of foreign policy and empire. Given Machiavelli’s significance as a political theorist, it is crucial to explore his potential influence on the Founding Fathers’ thoughts in establishing the American Republic. Such an examination is important because it reveals how Machiavellian principles may have shaped state-building efforts and contributed to the stability and longevity of the U.S. government and constitution.
Materials and Methods
The present study used a qualitative, text-based documentary approach and analyzed library–documentary sources to demonstrate how Machiavelli’s ideas had influenced the views of the Founding Fathers. A close examination of Chapters 2–8 of The Discourses: Book 1 was conducted to reveal Machiavelli’s influence. These chapters are considered essential because they focus on the organization of political regimes. Four of these chapters are particularly significant, as they directly address the prudent establishment of a regime and constitution, offering guidance to future founders.
Results and Discussion
The analysis revealed that the Founding Fathers were significantly influenced by Machiavelli in their understanding of human nature and the formulation of the constitution. They drew on his ideas to create a mixed regime. The Founding Fathers were also guided by Machiavelli in their approach to foreign policy, their pursuit of empire, and their definition of the role of the people as defenders of freedom and guardians of the constitution. Consequently, some of the most fundamental aspects of the United States of American were rooted in Machiavelli’s theories and perspectives, even if they were not openly acknowledged. The durability and stability of the U.S. Constitution, in contrast to the instability and variability of the French Constitution, can be attributed to the Founding Fathers’ reliance on the insights of a thinker who had gained his wisdom through “long experience of modern things and the continuous readings of ancient [things]” (Machiavelli, 1989, p. 1); who had opposed fictitious principalities and republics that existed only in theory (Ibid, p. 93). In contrast, the French pursued abstract concepts and implemented purely theoretical ideas, guided by a philosopher whose “true masterpiece” was referred to as “Reveries of the Solitary Walker” (Rousseau, 1782, p. 12). The utopian republic they aimed to establish had to remain a mere figment of the imagination. According to the findings,  
Conclusion
According to the results, the Founding Fathers’ views aligned with and were shaped by Machiavelli’s theories. The findings can provide a new foundation for American studies and Machiavelli studies, and pave the way for further research. Given that the theoretical foundations underlying the establishment of the United States of America have been neglected in academic discussions in Iran, the present study can be considered a pioneering effort to address the Founding Fathers’ thoughts and the influence of other philosophers on the establishment of the U.S. government. Furthermore, by focusing on the founding principles of America, the results of the study can lead to a more realistic approach toward the U.S. and the adoption of more thoughtful strategies in foreign policy. This study does not claim that the Founding Fathers relied solely on Machiavellian theories while disregarding other intellectuals. Rather, it aimed to demonstrate that dismissing or denying Machiavelli’s influence on the establishment of the United States is both unjustified and unwise, despite the Founding Fathers not explicitly referencing his ideas. Nevertheless, by focusing on two fundamental texts, the present inquiry sought to provide meaningful insights without undermining the results. A more precise and detailed understanding of the topic requires an examination of numerous documents and extensive debates that took place during the Constitutional Convention until the adoption of the Constitution in the thirteen state assemblies.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Translated References into English
Alem, Abdorahman. (2015). History of Political Philosophy in West. Tehran: Ministry of Foreign Affairs. [In Persian]
Arendt, Hannah. (2018). On Revolution, Translated by Ezatollah Fouladvand. Tehran: Kharazmi. [In Persian]
Berlin, Isaiah. (2014). The Crooked Timber of Humanity. Translated by Leyla Sazgar. Tehran: Ghoghnous. [In Persian]
Bjornlund, Lidia. (2019). The Constitution and the Founding of America. Translated by Mahdi Haghighatkhah. Tehran: Ghoghnous. [In Persian]
Burke, Edmund. (2014). Reflections on the Revolution in France. Translated by Soheil Saffari. Tehran: Negah Moaser. [In Persian]
Cassirer, Ernst. (2010). Philosophy of the Enlightenment. Translated by Yadoallah Moughen. Tehran: Niloufar. [In Persian]
Diamond, Martin. (1994). Federalist in Leo Strauss’ History of Political Philosophy. Translated by Ahmad Tadayon. Tehran: Kavir. [In Persian]
Ghasemzadeh, Ghasem. (1957). Constitutional Law of France. Tehran: Tehran University Press. [In Persian]
Hamilton, Alexander. (2018). The Federalist Papers. Translated by Bagher Parham. _: Tavana. [In Persian]
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. (1999). Elements of the Philosophy of Right. Translated by Mahbod Iranitalab. Tehran: Ghatreh. [In Persian]
Jones, William. (1979). Masters of Political Thought. Translated by Ali Ramin. Tehran: Amirkabir. [In Persian]
Labica, Georges. (2019). Robespierre, a politics of philosophy. Translated by Vahik Keshishzsdeh. Tehran: Mehrandish. [In Persian]
Machiavelli, Niccolo. (2009). Discourses on Livy. Translated by Mohamadhasan Lotfi. Tehran: Kharazmi. [In Persian]
Madison, James. (2021). The Federalist Papers. Translated by Masoud Alemi. Tehran: Minovi Kherad. [In Persian]
Manent, Pierre. (2015). An Intellectual History of Liberalism. Translated by Abdoalvahab Ahmadi.Tehran: Agah. [In Persian]
McClelland, John. (2019). A History of Western Political Thought. Translated by Jahangir Moeini Alamdari. Tehran: Ney. [In Persian]
Neumann, Franz. (2011). Freedom, Power, and Law. Translated by Ezatollah Fouladvand. Tehran: Kharazmi. [In Persian]
Nisbet, Robert. (2020). Conservatism: Dream and Reality. Translated by Mohammadreza Fadaei. Tehran: Shirazeh Ketab Ma. [In Persian]
Pazouki, Shahram. (2017). Theories About the Practice (Discourses on Theory and Praxis Relation). Tehran: Iranian Research Institute of Philosophy. [In Persian]
Plato. (2013). Republic. Translated by Foad Rohani. Tehran: Elmi va Farhangi. [In Persian]
Plutarch. (2008). Parallel Lives. Translated by Reza Mashayekhi... Tehran: Elmi va Farhangi. [In Persian]
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. (2018). Reveries of the Solitary Walker. Translated by Ahmad Samiei Gilani. Tehran: Niloufar. [In Persian]
Schmitt, Carl. (2015). Political Romanticism. Translated by Soheil Saffari. Tehran: Negah Moaser. [In Persian]
Strauss, Leo. (2012). What is political philosophy? Translated by Farhang Rajaei. Tehran: Elmi va Farhangi. [In Persian]
Strauss, Leo. (2013). The City and Man. Translated by Rasoul Namazi. Tehran: Agah. [In Persian]
Strauss, Leo. (2017). An Introduction to Political Philosophy. Translated by Yashar Jeyrani. Tehran: Agah. [In Persian]
Tabatabaei, Javad. (2003). The Quarrel between the Ancient and the Modern: From Renaissance to French Revolution. Tehran: Negah Moaser. [In Persian]
Tocqueville, Alexis. (2019). The Old Regime and the Revolution. Translated by Mohsen Solasi. Tehran: Morvarid. [In Persian]
Vierhaus, Rudolf. (2013). Conservatism in Dictionary of the History of Ideas. Translated by Khashayar Deyhimi. Tehran: Ney. [In Persian]