Document Type : Research Paper

Author

PhD, Department of International Relations, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Introduction
It is customary for the heads of state or delegates of states to deliver speeches at the beginning of each regular general annual assembly on the most important current international events that are of urgent concern to their national interests, and to present their government's perspective on these international events, as well as to propose solutions to resolve crises and achieve sustainable regional and global peace and security. Therefore, examining the speeches of the heads of state of each country at the UNGA can first reveal the foundations of their view of the international order and system, then the most important international events from the perspective of their foreign policy, and finally their possible actions to overcome crises in the form of global partnership in the form of declared policy. From 1980, when then-Prime Minister Mohammad Ali Rajaee attended this meeting and announced the Islamic Republic of Iran's positions on the international world, until the 79th General Assembly in 2024, Iranian presidents have attended the UNGA a total of 24 times and have used this opportunity to present the "Foreign Policy Doctrine of the Islamic Republic of Iran (IRI)". Especially after the escalation of tensions centered on the nuclear issue, Iranian presidents have continuously used this position to convey the messages of the IRI's general policies to the public. The ultimate goal of this research is to understand the 45-year trend of the IRI's foreign policy and ultimately create a model for future research on Iranian foreign policy behavior.
Literature Review
In a review of Persian works that analyze the speeches of the presidents of the IRI at the UN, few works were found. These works examine these speeches at the UN from two perspectives: "discourse analysis from a linguistic perspective" and "content analysis from the perspective of international relations concepts." These works have a diverse theoretical basis. It should be noted that there are also studies in international relations that, as part of their research on foreign policy, address aspects of presidents' speeches at the UN, and these studies have no affinity with the present research work. If we examine these research works based on their focus on presidents, Hassan Rouhani's speeches have been studied more by researchers. Overall, based on the studies, none of these research works are similar to this study in terms of scope and final approach, and none of them sought to formulate a final foreign policy based on the policies declared by the presidents.
Methodology
Content analysis seeks to identify hidden linguistic meanings in a text, and from this perspective, it is possible to examine the texts of presidents' speeches at the UN using a type of content analysis method. If it focuses on a "qualitative" approach, it can ultimately create conceptual models and maps by logically combining axes, indicators, and specialized metaphorical concepts, and from a macro perspective, focusing on counting the items found in the text, it can qualitatively formulate specialized metaphors. For this reason, the research method "patterning based on inductive content analysis" was identified as a suitable method for this research and was used.
Results and Discussion
Based on the research findings, we found that common features are visible in the foreign policy doctrine of the administrations of the IRI, including:

There is a negative and pessimistic view of the great powers.
The main approach towards international organizations is that they are ineffective and in need of fundamental reform and transformation (especially the UN and the Security Council).
In the international system, a continuous confrontation between the two main currents, "protectors and supporters of the status quo" and "change-seeking actors," has been recognized by the administrations of the IRI, which in the last two decades is gradually shaping a new order of the "Neo Cold War".
In the international system, they see evidence of the emergence of a new international order that is in serious conflict with the current international system, and since they have a strong desire for change, they try to define themselves as "change-seekers" in this new international order.
They consider the current international system to be a system of unjust domination.

The final and combined result of these three propositions indicates that the main and continuous doctrine of the foreign policy of the IRI is the "doctrine of change seeking in the current international system."

Conclusion

Based on the findings of this research, fundamental principle shaping the foreign policy table is the concept and trend of "revolutionism or change seeking against the status quo," which can be defined in the dimension of foreign relations and the international system with the approach of "revolutionism in opposition to the current international system." For this reason, the complete convergence in foreign policy of administrations over the past 45 years, despite differences in political taste in domestic issues, is clearly visible. The final point is that if we consider the approach of "change seeking based on the negation of the system of domination" which has been transformed into "change seeking against the current international system" in the foreign policy doctrine as the basis for the performance of the foreign policy of the IRI, then as a future studies, these two propositions will be correct: "The foreign policy of the IRI will support any international actor, any bilateral or multilateral coalition or alliance, or any trend and process that can take steps towards the change of the current international order," and in contrast, "The foreign policy of the IRI will avoid and confront any trend, process, actor or coalition in the international system that seeks to strengthen the status quo."

Keywords

Main Subjects

فارسی
·        انصاریان،  شادی. داوری اردکانی، نگار. بامشادی، پارسا. (1398). واکاوی سخنرانی حسن روحانی در مجمع عمومی سازمان ملل متحد در سال1396با رویکرد تحلیل گفتمان پل جی. زبانشناسی اجتماعی. 2(2): 69-83.
·        بشیر، حسین. امین، محسن. (1398). تحلیل گفتمان سخنرانی‌های حسن روحانی و دونالد ترامپ در مجمع عمومی سازمان ملل به روش PDAM. پژوهش‌های راهبردی سیاست. 8(28): 207-238.
·        پهلوان‌نژاد،  محمدرضا. اصطهباناتی، لیدا. (1387). بررسی کنش‌های گفتار در سخنرانی‌های روسای جمهور ایران و آمریکا شهریور ۱۳۸۵، سازمان ملل. پژوهش زبان‌های خارجی (نشریه دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی دانشگاه تبریز). 51(208): 1-24.
·        جعفری، امید. (1398). بررسی ایدئولوژیکی ترجمه شفاهی سخنرانی رئیس‌جمهور ایران در سازمان ملل: ترجمه انگلیسی شبکه‌های پرس تی وی ایران و فرانس 24 فرانسه‎. زبان پژوهی. 11(33): 7-21.
·        حداد، غلامرضا. (1398). تحلیل سخنرانی‌های حسن روحانی در مجمع عمومی سازمان ملل بر اساس نظریه کنش-گفتار: 2015 تا 2018. پژوهش‌نامه علوم سیاسی. 14(2): 63-98.
·        حداد، غلامرضا. (1400). تحلیل گفتمان انتقادی سخنرانی‌ حسن روحانی در مجمع عمومی سازمان ملل متحد در سال 2018. پژوهش‌های راهبردی سیاست. 10(36): 181-215.
·        رضایی، علی‌اکبر. (1400). آسیب‌شناسی سیاست خارجی دولت محمود احمدی‌نژاد از منظر آرمان‌گرایی. پژوهش ملل. 68(6): 65-82.
·        سلیمی، حسین. حاج زرگرباشی، روح‌الله. (1392). الگوی سخنرانی روسای جمهوری اسلامی ایران در مجمع عمومی سازمان ملل متحد. سیاست جهانی. 2(4): 35-71.
·        شعبانی، منصور. حبیب زاده، سید‌میثاق. (1400). تحلیل گفتمان انتقادی سخنرانی‌های رؤسای جمهور پیشین جمهوری اسلامی ایران در مجمع عمومی سازمان ملل متحد. بررسی از نگاه زبان‌شناسی. 12(4): 405-437.
·        شوکتی مقرب، سمیه. خرمایی، علیرضا. مولودی، امیرسعید. تاجیک، محمدرضا. (1400). ‌نقش روابط مجاز آفرین در ترسیم مرزهای خود و دیگری: تحلیل نقادانه-شناختی قدرت‌های جهانی و تروریسم در گفتمان اولین سخنرانی خاتمی، احمدی‌نژاد و روحانی در مجمع عمومی سازمان ملل متحد‎. زبان‌شناسی اجتماعی. 4(2): 101-116.
·        ظهوری عین الدین، عباس. پورعلی، سعید. (1399). تحلیل محتوای کیفی سخنرانی‌های رئیس دولت یازدهم (حسن روحانی) در سازمان ملل با رویکرد استقرایی‎. پژوهش سیاست نظری. 26(14): 35-58.
·        منیری، سید هاشم. اطهری، سیدحسین. (1403). استعاره مفهومی «مسیر» و «تحول عدالت» در گفتمان سیاست خارجی دولت سیزدهم با تأکید بر سخنرانی‌های رئیس‌جمهور در مجمع سالیانه سازمان ملل متحد. پژوهش‌نامه ایرانی سیاست بین‌الملل. 12(2): 491-513.
·        موسوی،  سیده لیلا.  نیری، هومن. (1393). تحلیل سخنان حسن روحانی و باراک اوباما در مجمع عمومی سازمان ملل متحد و تأثیر آن بر روابط آتی ایران و آمریکا بر اساس "نظریه کنش گفتار". سیاست (دانشگاه تربیت مدرس). 4(1): 39-48.
·        نوری، وحید. (1391). استراتژی منزلت طلبی سیاست خارجی ایران: تحلیل محتوای سخنان رئیس‌جمهوری در سازمان ملل متحد‎. نگاه ایرانی روابط خارجی (ایرفا). 3(19):127-152.
 

Translated References into English

·        Ansarian SH & Davari Ardakani N & Bamshadi P. (2019). Analysis of President Rouhani’s Speech at the UN General Assembly in 2017: Paul Gee’s Discourse Analysis Approach. Journal of Sociolinguistics. 2(2): 83-69. [In Persian]
·        Bashir H & Amin M. (2019). Discourse Analysis of Hassan Rouhani and Donald Trump Speeches at the General Assembly of the United Nations with PDAM Method. Political Strategic Studies. 8(28): 207-238. [In Persian]
·        Haddad Gh. R. (2019). Analysis of Hassan Rouhani's Speeches at the UN General Assembly Based on Speech-Action Theory: 2015 to 2018. Research letter of Political Science. 14(2): 63-98. [In Persian]
·        Haddad Gh. R. (2021). A Critical Discourse Analysis of Hassan Rouhani's Speech at the 2018 UN General Assembly. Political Strategic Studies. 10(36): 181-215. [In Persian]
·        Jafari O. (2020). Ideological Investigation of Interpretation of Iranian president’s Speech in the UN: English Interpretation of Presstv Channel of Iran and France 24 of France. JlR : journal of Language Related. 11(33): 7-21. [In Persian]
·        Moniri S.H & Athari S.H. (2024). The Conceptual Metaphor of "Path" and "Transformation of Justice" In The Foreign Policy Discourse of The 13th Government (With Emphasis on the Speeches of President at the Annual Assembly of the United Nations). Iranian Research Letter of International Politics. 12(2): 491-513. [In Persian]
·        Mosavi S.L & Nayeri H. (2014). Analysis of Hassan Rouhani and Barak Obama’s speeches at the UNGA and their impact on future relations between Iran and US based on Speech Act Theory. Politics, Tarbiat Modares University Press. 4(1): 39-48. [In Persian]
·        Noori V. (2012). Status-Seeking and Iranian Foreign Policy: The Speeches of the President at the United Nations. Iranian Review of Foreign Affairs. 3(19): 127-152. [In Persian]
·        Pahlavannezhad M.R & Estahbanati L. (2008). Study of speech acts in speeches of the presidents of Iran and the United States, September 2006, United Nations. Journal of Foreign language research. 51(208): 1-24. [In Persian]
·        Rezai A.A. (2021). Pathology of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's Foreign Policy from the Perspective of Idealism. International Journal of Nations Research. 68(6): 65-82. [In Persian]
·        Salimi  S & Zargarbashi R. (2015). Speech Pattern of Iranian Presidents at the UN General Assembly. World Politics A Quarterly Journal. 2(4): 35-71. [In Persian]
·        Shabani M & Habibzadeh S M. (2021). Critical Discourse Analysis of Speeches of Previous Presidents of Islamic Republic of Iran at the United Nations General Assembly. Language Related Research. 12(4): 405-437. [In Persian]
·        Shokati Mogharab S & Khormaee A &  Moloodi A.S & Tajik M.R. (2021). The Role of Metonymy-Producing Relationships in Drawing Self and Other Borders: A Cognitive Critical Discourse Analysis of World Powers and Terrorism in the First Statements by Khatami, Ahmadinejad and Rouhani in the General Assembly of the United Nations. Journal of Sociolinguistics. 4(2): 101-116. [In Persian]
·        Zohuri Einoddin A & Pourali S. (2019). Qualitative content analysis of President XI speeches (Hassan Rouhani) at the United Nations in an inductive approach. Research in Theoritical Politics. 26(14): 35-58. [In Persian]