Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Assistant Professor, Eco Collage, Allameh Tabataba’I University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Achieving political development among South Asian societies, especially since independence in the mid-20th century, has been one of the most important issues facing governments and civil society in these countries. In the present study, it has been attempted to explore the trends that have taken place in India by utilizing theories of political development and testing them with the existing realities to achieve a unique political development paradigm. The main question in doing this research is how the pattern of political development in India is shaped and to what extent are they consistent with the indicators of classical political development theories, such as urbanization, literacy and economic status, and so on? What this study reveals is that the state of political development in the Indian case study differs markedly from the prevailing theories and analyzes of patterns of political development in different countries. In fact, it seems that the particular historical and political characteristics of the country's political and social culture play a fundamental role in laying the foundations for the development of its political structures. This has led to a special process of political development and modernization in the country, confirming that external or imported patterns are not necessarily the only way to achieve development.

Keywords

الف) فارسی

بدیع، برتران، (1376) توسعه سیاسی، ترجمه احمد نقیب زاده، تهران: قومس.

ب) انگلیسی

Almond, G. & J. S. Coleman, (1960), The Politics of the Developing Areas, Princeton University Press.
Apter, D, (1965), The Politics of Modernization, Chicago University Press.
Asian Development Bank (Retrieved 16 August 2017) “Poverty in India”.
Chandra, Bipan & Mridula Mukherjee & Aditya Mukherjee, (2008), India Since Independence, New Delhi: Penguin Books.
Dahl, R. & C. Lindblom, (1957), Politics, Economics and Welfare, New York: Harper and Row.
data.worldbank.org, (Retrieved 2019-01-17), “Urban population (% of total) Data”.
Dean, Nelson, (September 2009), “UN Says Caste System Is A Human Rights Abuse”, The Daily Telegraph (London).  
Deutsch, K, (1953), Nationalism and Social Communication, New York & London: Chapmand & Hall.      
Echeverri-Gent, J, (January 2002), “Politics in India's Decentred Polity”, in Ayres, A.; Oldenburg, P., Quickening the Pace of Change, London: India Briefing.
Encyclopedia Britannica Online (Retrieved 10 December 2014), “Indo-Aryan languages”.
Freedom House, (2010), “Freedom in the World 2006: Selected Data from Freedom House's Annual Global Survey of Political Rights and Civil Liberties”.
https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/india-population.
Human Rights Watch, (2011), “World Report 2011: India”.
IMF.org, (October 2019), “World Economic Outlook Database”.
Khan, Saeed, (25 January 2010), "There's no National Language in India: Gujarat High Court”, The Times of India, Retrieved 5 May 2014.
Ministry of Panchayati Raj (Retrieved on June 2020) https://lgdirectory.gov.in/rptConsolidateforRuralLB.do.
Panchayati Raj and Governance in India, (2001), In: Atul Kohli (Ed.), The Success of India's Democracy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
“Preamble of the Constitution of India, (October 9, 2017) Ministry of Law & Justice, Archived from the Original.
Reporters without Borders, (2010), “Press Freedom Index 2011”.
Russet, B, (1973), “Are Instability and Inequality Related?” in: Lewis and Potter, The Practice of Comparative Politics, Open University Set Book.
Sathyamurthy, T.V, (March 30, 1996), “Centralized State Power and Decentralized Politics: Case of India”, Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 31, No. 13.
Shils, E, (1960), Political Development in the New States, the Hague, Mouton and Co.
Singh, M. P. & Himanshu Roy, (2005), Indian Political System, India: Manak.