Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Public Law, Allameh Tabataba’i University

2 M.A Student of Public Law, Allameh Tabataba’i University

Abstract

The function of protection institution of the constitutional in every legal system is always protecting the aspirations of the nation and fundamental rights. This institution can accelerate or even weaken the movement of people in countries that are transitioning to democracy. Public trust in these institutions is closely linked to their independence. The effective factor of this independence is the appointment of the judges of the courts. As for the various systems of selection of judges, it is possible to determine the extent and manner of the interference of other organizations in this regard. Iraq and Turkey, which have undergone democratic changes in recent years, have experienced varying degrees of independence and, consequently, legitimacy by following different patterns of selection of constitutional judges. With the implementation of administrative model, the Iraqi state has strongly influenced the executive branch, and the issuance of unilateral sentences for the benefit of the ruling party can prove this hypothesis. However, Turkey, deviating from the executive model and accepting a multi-domain pattern, has increased the participation of civil society organizations and other branches in the selection of court judges and increased the legitimacy of the court.

Keywords

الف) فارسی

کدخدایی، عباسعلی، (1382)، «ضرورت پاسداری از قانون اساسی و حقوق شهروندان»، کتاب نقد، سال هفتم، شماره 22.
موسی زاده، ابراهیم و همکاران، (1389)، دادرسی اساسی در جمهوری اسلامی ایران (اصول قانون اساسی در پرتو نظرات شورای نگهبان 1389-1359)، چاپ اول، تهران: معاونت تدوین، تنقیح و انتشار قوانین و مقررات.

ب) انگلیسی

Akkas, Sarkar Ali, (2004), Appointment of Judges: A Key Issue of Judicial Independence, Bond Law Review, Vol. 16, pp. 200-210.
Al-Ali, Zaid, (2014), The Struggle for Iraq’s Future: How Corruption, Incompetence and Sectarianism Have Undermined Democracy, New Haven, Conn, Yale University Press.
Arato, Andrew, (2010), “The Constitutional Reform Proposal of the Turkish Government: The Return of Majority Imposition” Constellations, Vol. 17, No. 2.
Bâli, Aslı, (2012), “The Perils of Judicial Independence: Constitutional Transition and the Turkish Example”, Virginia Journal of International Law, Vol. 52, No. 2.
Bâli, Aslı, (2013), “Courts and Constitutional Transition: Lessons from the Turkish Case” International Journal of Constitutional Law, Vol. 11, No. 3.
Carl Baar, (1991), “Comparative Perspectives on Judicial Selection Processes' in Appointing Judges: Philosophy, Politics and Practice”, Ontario Law Commission, Ontario.
Cleveland, William L; and Bvntvn, Martin C, (2013), Modern Middle Eastern History, Boulder, Westview.
Diamond, Larry, (2005), Squandered Victory: The American Occupation and the Bungled Effort to Bring Democracy to Iraq, New York: Times Books.
European Commission. (2010). ‘Turkey 2010 Progress Report’, available at http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/pdf/key_ documents/2010/package/tr_rapport_2010_en.pdf.
Feldman, Noah and Martinez, Roman, (2006), Constitutional Politics and Text in the New Iraq: An Experiment in Islamic Democracy, Fordham Law Review, Vol. 75.
Friedland, Martin L, (1995), A Place Apart: Judicial Independence and Accountability in Canada, Canadian Judicial Council, Toronto.
Gibbs, Harry, (1987), The Appointment and Removal of Judges, Federal Law Review, Vol. 17.
Hamoudi, Haider. (2011). ‘”The Will of the (Iraqi) People”, Utah Law Review, Vol. 1, pp. 45–61.
Hamoudi, Haider, (2013), Negotiating in Civil Conflict: Constitutional Construction and Imperfect Bargaining in Iraq, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Harding, Andrew, Leyland, Peter and Groppi, Tania, (2009), Constitutional Courts: Forms, Functions and Practice in Comparative Perspective, in Andrew Harding and Peter Leyland (eds), Constitutional Courts: A Comparative Study, London: Wildy, Simmonds & Hill.
Hedling, Nora, (2011), “The Design of the Judicial Branch’, in Markus Böckenförde”, Nora Hedling, Winluck Wahiu (eds), A Practical Guide to Constitution Building, Stockholm: International IDEA.  Available at <http://www.idea.int/ publications/pgcb.
Hirschl, Ran, (2004), Towards Juristocracy: The Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism, Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
Howard Taft, William, (1913), The Selection and Tenure of Judges, Faculty Scholarship Series, Paper 3946.
Kogacioglu, Dicle, (2004), Progress, Unity and Democracy: Dissolving Political Parties in Turkey, Law & Society Review, Vol. 38.
Mahmoud, Medhat, (2004), “Judicial System in Iraq: A Review of the Legislation Regulating Judicial Affairs in Iraq”, available at http://gjpi.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/mahmood _2004.pdf.
Özpek, Burak Bilgehan, (2012), Constitution-making in Turkey after the 2011 Elections, Turkish Studies, Vol, 13.
Posner, Michael, and McKay, Fiona, (2003), “The Iraqi Justice System: Challenges in Responding to Iraq’s Past Abuses of Human Rights”, The Judges’ Journal, Vol. 42.
Roberts, Justin, (2008), “Iraq’s Burgeoning Judiciary: Current Issues and the Best Way Forward”, Humanities and Social Sciences, Vol. 4T, No. 1.
Sadurski, Wojciech, (2009), “Twenty Years after the Transition: Constitutional Review in Central and Eastern Europe“, Sydney Law School Research Paper No. 09/69, 23 , July 2009, available http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1437843.
Shambayati, Hooten and Kirdis, Esen, (2009), “In Pursuit of “Contemporary Civilization”: Judicial Empowerment in Turkey”, Political Research Quarterly, Vol. 62.
Sly, Liz, (2015), “Iraq’s High Court Orders Parliament to Get Back to Wor”, Los Angeles Times, 25 October available at http://articles.latimes.com/2010/oct/25/world/la-fg-iraq-court-ruling-20101025.
Trumbull, Charles, and Martin, Julie,. (2011), “Elections and Government Formation in Iraq: An Analysis of the Judiciary’s Role”, Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, Vol. 44.

ج) منابع اینترنتی

http://kurdpress.com/details.aspx?id=4274.