State Studies

Janus-faced Populism: De-democratization or Democratization of Democracy?

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Mohsen Abbaszadeh Marzbali

Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22054/tssq.2023.69050.1278
Abstract
As one of the most visible aspects of political life in recent years, the populist rises imply the ‘crisis of representation’ that means the existing institutional mechanism of representative democracy is ineffective in representing the variety of social demands. While this situation, according to the liberal democratic approach, warns of the revival of mass society and new versions of authoritarianism, the radical democratic approach considers it a possibility to retrieve democracy.
 
Which variables determine the contending evaluations of the impact of populism on democracy? The present paper presupposes that the contending evaluations are driven by different conceptions of the principal constituent of democracy (rule of law or general will?) and the populism entity (a manner of governance or a movement constructing collective will?). Given the postulates of the contending democratic theories (liberal and radical), the paper hypothesizes that evaluating the effects of populism on democracy depends on the way of interaction of some variables: a) the content of the populist discourse (egalitarian articulation of plural demands or discriminatory one?); b) the context in which the populist movement arises (democratic structure of opportunity or authoritarian one?) c) the mutual strategy of political actors whether from opposition or in position ones (the connection between street politics and institutional one or disconnection?). Taking advantage of the contending democratic theories (liberal and radical) in a combinative theoretical framework, the paper attempts to justify the hypothesis by highlighting the fact that both democratic theories are built on one aspect of the conception of democratic order.
 
Marking the elements such as individual subjectivity, rationality, the rule of law, pluralism, etc. as characteristics of democratic order, a liberal democratic approach considers populist popular and exclusionary (i.e., determined by populists’ particular definition of the people) orientation as a threat to democracy. It is because such orientation restricts public debates and leads to weakening democratic institutions, the opposition’s rights, and the plurality of society. On the contrary, the radical democratic approach points to the significance of the populist mobilization for the democratization of status quo democracies owing to re-politicization of the issues neglected by the sovereign elite, provided that to articulate accumulated demands around a democratic egalitarian nodal point. Such evaluation emanates from the fact that this approach identifies democracy with collective subjectivity, general will, participation, and so on.
 
It seems that a non-paradoxical and justifiable reference to both the above-mentioned approach in an analysis of the effect of populism on democracy entails taking their different concentrations into account. It means ‘populism-in-power’ (as a way of governance) puts the structural foundations of democracy in danger and facilitates the emergence of authoritarianism due to its anti-institutionalism, anti-pluralism, and tendency to mass politics. It is whilst, in the status of ‘opposition’ (a mobilizing movement), populism might be an opportunity to revive democratic politics. This argument resorts to the action of constructing a new collective will, in populist strategies of mobilizations, which reveals shortages of representative systems such as the monopoly of a minority, technocratic elitism, and so on. Nevertheless, the actualization of the progressive effects of the populist movements on democracy depends heavily on the interaction of variables which are as follows.  
 

a) If the populist discourse articulates accumulated social demands around a democratic egalitarian will, then the populist moment (as the moment of crisis in a representative democracy) can be of progressive connotations for democracy-deepening. Conversely, discriminatory articulation (like racist or class populism) paves the way for authoritarianism. Hence in terms of democratization and de-democratization, various populisms can be imagined; ranging from democratic populism to authoritarian, leftist to far-right.

 

b)  Realization of the above-mentioned progressive version of populism depends on the ‘democratic structure of political opportunity’. The possibility of mobilization by democratic egalitarian populism is only imaginable where the rules of the democratic competition are guaranteed. In other words, if there is no equal and fair opportunity to declare the policies in electoral campaigns and implement them after taking into power, then there can be just governmental types of populism that mobilize the mass for advocating governmental policies and decisions. Here, populism appears in its authoritarian face in a mass society.

 

c) The third variable is the strategy that political actors of both realms, movement, and institution, in a political structure adapt. If the populist movement ties its street activism with institutional bargaining (e.g. by resorting to parliamentary parties) and, mutually, the government opens up the policy-making input to populist demands (rather than rejecting them), then the rise of a democratic egalitarian populist movement might result in democracy- deepening. Otherwise, populism can bring about some contending de-democratizing mass mobilizations, whether in the shape of authoritarian up-to-down governmental populism or fruitless gross-root radical populism.

 
In brief, the paper maintains that by vindicating ‘popular sovereignty’, populism has double-edged effects in terms of weakening or strengthening democracy; ranging from an infertile radicalism leading to authoritarianism to radical reformism containing the possibility of retrieval of democracy. Hence democratic theory needs to develop an order that balances the rule of law and public will as two sides of democracy. It calls for a new social contract based on a balanced relationship between specialism and democratic responsibility. To reach such a situation, more inclusive politics should be targeted by current-day democracies. The key, however, is hearing the demands of populist advocators rather than populist leaders’ programs.

Keywords

Demand
The Crisis of Representation
People
Host Ideology
Movement
 آدورنو، تئودور (1399)، «سویه­های راست­گرایی افراطی نو»، ترجمه یگانه خویی، بازیابی شده در 17/ 9/ 1400 از: https://problematica.com
تاجیک، محمدرضا (1398)، زیست جنبش: این جنبش یک جنبش نیست، تهران: نگاه معاصر.
تاگارت، پل (1385)، پوپولیسم، ترجمه: حسن مرتضوی، تهران: آشیان، چاپ دوم.
تاگیف، پییر آندره؛ لیوژیه، رافائل (1398)، ظهور پوپولیسم ملی نو (اروپا در چنبره­ احزاب پوپولیستی)، ترجمه دکتر منصور وثوقی، تهران: چاپخش.
جیمسون، فردریک (2017)، «مردم می­گویند "این‌یک فاشیسم جدید است" من می­گویم "هنوز نه"»، بازیابی شده در 10/ 9/ 1400 از:  https://www.radiozamaneh.com/317756/
حسینی­زاده، سید محمدعلی؛ امیر، سید محمد؛ شفیعی، محسن (1397) «پوپولیسم راست در اروپای غربی و ایالات‌متحده آمریکا و زمینه­های شکل­گیری آن»، رهیافت­های سیاسی و بین­المللی، سال 10، شماره 1، صص: 112- 84.
دال، رابرت (1378) درباره دموکراسی، ترجمه: حسن فشارکی، تهران: شیرازه.
دکر، فرانک (1399)، «پوپولیسم راست‌گرا در اروپا: نگاهی جامع به روند قدرت گرفتن احزاب راست افراطی در اروپا» ترجمه: محمد زارعی و فاطمه سیرفی،  بازیابی شده در 24/ 10/ 1400 از: https://politicul.ir/right-wing-populism-in-europe/
دلاپورتا، دوناتلا، ماریو دیانی (1390)، مقدمه­ای بر جنبش­های اجتماعی، ترجمه محمدتقی دلفروز، تهران: کویر، چاپ سوم.
رانسیر، ژاک (1388)، ده تز در باب سیاست، ترجمه: امید مهرگان، تهران: رخداد نو.
سرزعیم، علی (1394)، «کیفیت نهادها و ترکیب مخارج دولت: یک الگوی نظری»، فصلنامه علمی- پژوهشی برنامه­ریزی و بودجه، سال 20، شماره 3،  صص: 211- 189.
سمیعی اصفهانی، علیرضا (1398)، «درآمدی نظری بر مفهوم، ماهیت و عملکرد پوپولیسم»، رهیافت­های سیاسی و بین­المللی، سال 11، شماره 2، صص: 85- 62.
فریدن، مایکل (2018)، «بازخوانی پوپولیسم به­مثابه ایدئولوژی»، ترجمه وفا مهرآیین، بازیابی شده در 14/ 11/ 1400 از: https://www.radiozamaneh.com/392302
کاستلز، مانوئل (1399)، گسست: بحران لیبرال دموکراسی، ترجمه: مجتبی قلی­پور، تهران: پژوهشکده مطالعات راهبردی.
لاکلائو، ارنستو؛ ژیژک، اسلاوی ]دیالوگ[ (1388)، در ستایش پوپولیسم، گردآوری و ترجمه: محمد ایزدی و عباس ارض­پیما، تهران: رخداد نو.
لاوسن، جورج (1400)، کالبدشکافی­های جدید انقلاب، ترجمه: مهدی زیبایی، تهران:نگاه معاصر.
موثقی، احمد (1398) «پوپولیسم سیاسی- اقتصادی و فرهنگی، دموکراسی و توسعه»، فصلنامه سیاست، سال 49، شماره 4، صص: 1210- 1193.
موف، شانتال (1398)، در دفاع از پوپولیسم چپ، ترجمه: حسین رحمتی، تهران: اختران.
موف، شانتال (2016)، «چرخش پوپولیستی»،  بازیابی شده در 5/ 9/ 1400 از:     https://www.radiozamaneh.com/311659
مولر، یان ورنر (1396)، پوپولیسم چیست؟، ترجمه: بابک واحدی، تهران: بیدگل.
مونو، ژان کلود (1388)، «قدرت پوپولیسم: یک تحلیل فلسفی»، گفتگو، شماره 54: 71- 61.
موود، کاس؛ والسر، ک.ر.کالت (1398)، مقدمه­ای خیلی کوتاه بر پوپولیسم، ترجمه: احمد موثقی و حسن اعمایی، تهران: نگاه معاصر.
نظری، علی اشرف؛ سلیمی برهان (1394)، «پوپولیسم راستِ افراطی در دموکراسی های اروپایی: مطالعه موردی فرانسه»، فصلنامه دولت پژوهی، سال 1، شماره 4، صص: 185- 157.
نیومن، سال؛ چوت، سایمون (1398 )، «در باب سیاست و پوپولیسم معاصر: گفتگو با سال نیومن و سایمون چوت درباره جمعیت، قدرت و پسا دموکراسی در قرن بیست و یکم» ترجمه مرتضی پاک‌نیت، روزنامه شرق، شنبه 28 دی، شماره 3626، ص 8.
Adoerno, T. (2020). “Aspects of New Right-Wing Extremism”, Y. KHoyi (Trans.), Retrieved from:  https://problematica.com  (In Persian).
Arditi, B. (2005). “Populism as an Internal Periphery of Democratic Politics”, in F. Panizza (Ed.) Populism and the Mirror of Democracy, (p.p. 72-98), London & New York: Verso.
Castells, M. (2020). Rapture: The Crisis of Liberal Democracy, M. Gholipor (Trans.), Tehran: Research Institute of Strategic Studies. (In Persian)
Crouch, C. (2004). Post-Democracy, Cambridge and Malden: Polity Press.
Dahl, R. (1999). On Democracy, H. Fesharaki (Trans.), Tehran: Shirazeh. (In Persian)
Decker, F. (2020). “Right-Wing Populism in Europe”, M. Zarei & F. Sirafi (Trans.), Retrieved from: https://politicul.ir/right-wing-populism-in-europe/  (In Persian)
Della Porta, D. & Diani, M. (2011). Social Movements, M. Delforoz (Trans.), Tehran: Kavir. (In Persian)
Derrida, J. (1994), Specters of Marx: The State of the Debt, the Work of Mourning, and the New International, trans. Peggy Kamuf, New York & London: Routledge.
Durante, T. (2021). “Global Consciousness and New Visual Order: The Populist Aesthetic Challenge”. Academia Letters, Article 2439, Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.20935/AL2439
Freeden, M. (2018). “Reading Populism as Ideology”, V. Mehrayin (Trans.), Retrieved from: https://www.radiozamaneh.com/392302   (In Persian).
Heinisch, R. C, Holtz-Bacha, C., & Mazzoleni, M. (Eds), (2017), Political Populism: A Handbook, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.
Hosainizadeh, S.M, Amir, S.M & Shafei`I. (2019). “Right-wing Populism in Europe and the USA and the Grounds of Its Formation”, Political and International Approaches, 10 (1): 84- 112. (In Persian)
Jameson, F. (2017). “People Are Saying 'This Is a New Fascism' and My Answer Is – Not Yet!”, Retrieved from:  https://www.radiozamaneh.com/317756/.   (In Persian)
Laclau, E. (2007). On Populist Reason, New York & London: Verso.
Laclau, E. & Zizek, S. (2009). For Populism, M. Izadi & A. Arazpeyma (Eds. & Trans), Tehran: Rokhdad-e No. (In Persian)
Laclau, E., Mouffe, Ch. (1985). Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics, London. New York: Verso.
Lawson, G. (2021). Anatomies of Revolution, M. Zibaei (Trans.), Tehran: Negah-e Moaser. (In Persian)
Mono, J. (2009). “The Power of Populism: A Philosophical Analysis”, Goft-o-Go, 54: 61-71. (In Persian)
Mouffe, Ch. (2016). “Populist Turn”, Retrieved from: https://www.radiozamaneh.com/311659 (In Persian).
Mouffe, Ch. (2019). For a Left Populism, H. Rahmati (Trans.), Tehran: Akhtaran. (In Persian)
Mounk, Y. (2018). The People vs. Democracy: Why Our Freedom Is in Danger and How to Save It, ‎ Harvard University Press.
Movaseghi, A. (2020). “Political- Economic and Cultural Populism, Democracy, and Development”, Politics Quarterly, 49 (4): 1193- 1210. (In Persian)
Mudde, C. & Kaltwasser, R. (2019). Populism: A Very Short Introduction, A. Movaseghi & H. Aemayi (Trans.), Tehran: Negah-e Moaser. (In Persian)
Muller, J. (2017). What is Populism? B. Vahedi (Trans.), Tehran: Bidgol. (In Persian)
Nazari, A. (2016). “Extreme Right-Wing Populism in European Democracies: Populist Extreme Right in France”, State Studies, 1 (4): 157-185. (In Persian)
Newman, S. & Simon, Ch. (2019). “On the Contemporary Politics and Populism [Interview]”, M. Pakniat (Trans.), Shargh Newspaper, 18 January, 3626: 8. (In Persian)
Osborne, T. (2021). “Civil Society, Populism and Liberalism”, International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society, 34: 175- 190.
Palonen, E. (2021). “Democracy vs. Demography: Rethinking Politics and the People as Debate”, Thesis Eleven, 164 (1): 88- 103.
Panizza, F. (Ed.) (2005). “Introduction”, in Populism and the Mirror of Democracy, London & New York: Verso.
Ranciere, J. (2009). Ten Theses on Politics, O. Mehregan (Trans.), Tehran: Rokhdad-e No. (In Persian)
Samiee Isfahani, A. (2019). “Theoretical Introduction on the Concept, Nature and Function of Populism”, Political and International Approaches, 11 (2): 62-85.  (In Persian)
Sarzaeem A. (2015). “The Quality of Institutions and the Composition of Government Expenditure: A Theoretical Model”, JPBUD, 20 (3): 189- 211. (In Persian)
Smilova, R. et al. (2020). Casual Mechanisms of Populism, WP4 (Causal, Policy and Futures Analysis) of PaCE project, (DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.27295.59043).
Taggart, P. (2006). Populism, H. Mortazavi (Trans.), Tehran: Ashian. (In Persian)
Taguieff, P. & Liogier, R. (2019). The Emergence of New National Populism, M. Vosoghi (Trans.), Tehran: Chapakhsh. (In Persian)
Tajic, M. (2019). Bio-Movement; This Movement Is Not a Movement, Tehran: Negah-e Moaser. (In Persian)
White, J. (2009). “The Social Theory of Mass Politics”, Journal of Politics, 71 (1): 96-112. 
State Studies
Volume 8, Issue 32
Winter 2023
Pages 97-128

Home

Guide for Authors

Submit Manuscript

Contact Us