Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Assistant Professor, Assistant Professor of the Department of Political Science, Research Institute of Hawzeh and University, Qom, Iran

Abstract

Mencius and Farabi are prominent representatives of two important Eastern intellectual traditions, namely Confucian-Chinese philosophy and Islamic-Iranian philosophy, who had basic reflections on the nature and functions of the state and how to moralize it efficiently. The basic question of the article is the attitude of these two political philosophers towards the fusion of ethics and politics in the state and how to draw the moral state. The hypothesis is based on the elaboration of ethics and politics in the concepts of utopia, prosperity, legitimacy and justice and the formation of the moral state from the perspective of Mencius and Farabi and their major similarity in the general approach, which, based on the comparative research method, has many commonalities and noteworthy differences. Government, essential good, continuity and unity of ethics and politics, instrumental and maximal government/comprehensive social security/providing security-welfare-virtue, Hakim-Shahriar government, relationship between religion, politics, spirituality and ethics, happiness is a multi-faceted and multi-dimensional matter/achievement Happiness is a relative matter, the legitimacy of the heavenly and earthly duality, moderation and middle ground/opposition to its excess and immorality/and comprehensive justice are the commonalities of these two. Establishing a balance between the elitist and populist approach by Mencius, more clarity on the instrumentality of the state/and in terms of the right of revolution, more emphasis on the duties of the government/servant government, empirical-rational-detailed description, comprehensive happiness between nature and will, the role of the people Beyond Farabi's theory/the voice of the people is the voice of God, and more emphasis on political justice, the differences between Menisos and Farabi in the field of moral government can be enumerated.
Mencius, a great thinker and philosopher of East Asia, and Farabi, a thinker and a high-level philosopher of West Asia, are two examples of treasures that the explanation of their opinions in the field of government can increase the connection between these two rich and deep traditions. In this research, an attempt has been made to analyze the fields related to ethics and politics, which are the components of the term called political ethics, and based on this, to clarify the similarities and differences between the two. Mensus, like Farabi, who is the second teacher in the philosophical tradition of Islam, can be called the second teacher in the Confucian tradition. He explained and explained and of course invented and theorized in the school of Confucius and is considered the closest interpreter of Confucius to him.
Like Aristotle, Mencius and Farabi believed that man is a political animal and can only fully expand these relationships when he is inside the state and society. He considers the government to be a moral institution and they believe that its head should be a moral leader. According to these two philosophers, the distribution of charity among all the members of Madinah is based on the eligibility of people. Charities include officials and positions, security, health, dignity and status, sanctity, property, wealth and the like. Therefore, all citizens have rights, and everyone has the right to have a job and work suitable to their social personality.
Unlike today's political philosophy in the West, Farabi does not believe in the separation of public and private spheres and considers them to be the same. The similarity between Al-Farabi and Mencius is the special prominence of political philosophy in the thoughts of these two. But in this field, the difference between the two is also clear. While Farabi follows political philosophy in the form of political wisdom in theory. Mencius seeks political wisdom in the public arena.
According to Mencius and Farabi, a good, efficient and superior government is the result of the combination of ethics and politics. Based on this, the work of a good government should start from the people and go up, not from the ruling class and go down. People are not only the root but also the last judge of the government. Utopia, which is an ideal society, is realized when ethics and politics are combined. Happiness is multifaceted and multidimensional. Learning the benevolence of the community and the people is the extension of justice. Justice is realized when people have the ability and power to exercise sovereignty and can criticize the government and, if necessary, criticize it or correct it. In response to this question, Mencius considers the government a moral institution and believes that its head should be a moral leader.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Abul Fatah Ahmad, Hale, (2000 AD) Philosophy of Ethics and Politics in Confucius, Egypt, Cairo, Dar Qaba Publishing House. [In Persian]
 
Ahmadi Tabatabai, Seyyed Mohammad Reza, (1387), Ethics and Politics, first edition, Tehran: Imam Sadegh University. [In Persian]
 
Erkun, Mohammad, (1379), Criticism of Islamic Reason, translator: Mohammad Mahdi Khalji, Tehran, Ide. [In Persian]
 
Iver, Mak, (1344), Society and Service, Ebrahim Ali Keni, Tehran: Book Translation and Publishing Company. [In Persian]
 
Bashirieh, Hossein (1381); Teaching political knowledge (fundamentals of theoretical political science), Tehran: 2nd edition of Negah Masahez publication. [In Persian]
 
Parivan, William, (1381), the evolution of political thought in the ancient East, Tehran, side. [In Persian]
 
Tohidfam, Mohammad; (2008), Discourse of ethics and politics in the paradigm of modernity and postmodernity, Journal of Faculty of Law and Political Science (Tehran University) Winter - No. 54, 29-54. [In Persian]
 
Jai, Chu and Weinberg Jai, (2007), History of Ancient Chinese Philosophy; A. Pashaei, Tehran, Maziar, first edition. [In Persian]
 
Jafarzadeh, Youssef, (2014), the concept of society from the point of view of Confucius, analytical philosophy, article 2, period 2, number 3 (5 consecutive), November 2014, 41-79. [In Persian]
           Chen, Li Fu, (1373), The Way of Confucius, Vaziri Gate, Mashhad, Astan Qods Razavi Publications, first edition. [In Persian]
 
Ching, Julia, (1383), Religions of China, Hamid Reza Arshadhi, Tehran, Center for the Recognition of Islam and Iran, first edition. [In Persian]
 
Haddad, Gholamreza, (1401), rentier pseudo-capitalism; The outcome of the paradoxes of the organ, instrumental and rentier government in the Islamic Republic of Iran, State Research Quarterly, 8th year, number 31, 113-144. [In Persian]
 
          Davari Ardakani, Reza, (1382) Farabi Philosopher of Culture, Tehran, Saghi Publishing House, first edition. [In Persian]
 
Russell, Bertrand (1361), Power, Najaf Daryabandari, Tehran: Khwarazmi. [In Persian]
 
Rajaei, Farhang, (1372) The evolution of political thought in the ancient East, Tehran, Quds. [In Persian]
 
Rostamian, Mohammad Ali, (2019), Ethics and Wisdom from the perspective of Farabi and Confucius, Ethic and Ethics, first year, number 2. [In Persian]
 
Siong Yu, Dal, (2014), Comparative study of the metaphysical foundations of political theory in ancient Iran and China, State Studies, Volume 1, Number 1, Page 21-1. [In Persian]
 
           Tabatabayi, Seyyed Javad, (1377) Decay of political thought in Iran; Tehran, Kavir, second edition. [In Persian]
 
Alam, Abdurrahman, (1377), Ancient Chinese Political Thought, Tehran, Office of Political and International Studies. [In Persian]
 
Abd al-Ali, Abd al-Salam, al-Falsafah al-Siyasiya And al-Farabi, Beirut: Dar al-Tali'ah, Ch2, 1986. [In Persian]
 
Ghalib, Mustafa, (1421 AH), al-Farabi, Beirut, Lebanon, Dar al-Maktab Al-Halal. [In Persian]
 
Ghazali, Ahmad, (1368), Revival of Uloom al-Din, Moyed al-Din Khwarazmi, Tehran: Scientific and Cultural. [In Persian]
 
Ghafari, Gholamreza (2018), The Logic of Comparative Research, Iranian Journal of Social Studies, Winter, Second Volume - Number 4, 119-99. [In Persian]
 
Farabi, (1348), Ihsa al-Uloom, Torba Al-Hussein Khadiojam, Tehran: Farhang Iran Foundation. [In Persian]
 
           Farabi, (1368) Al-Tanbiyah Ali Sabeel Al-Saada, research: Dr. Jafar Al-Yasin, Tehran, Hikmat, 1371. [In Persian]
.           Al-Farabi, (1907) Rasala fi ma'ani al-ul-Aql, Najafi and Mohammad Amin, Al-Khanji, Egypt, Al-Saada Press. [In Persian]
 
           Al-Farabi, (1960) Al-Siyasa al-Madini, research by Dr. Fouzi Metri-Najjar, Beirut, Kathologia Press. [In Persian]
 
Farabi, (1971) Abstract Seasons, Research, Fuzimetric Najjar, Beirut, Darul Mashreq. [In Persian]
 
          Farabi, (1991) Opinions of Ahl al-Madinah al-Fazlah, Dr. Albir Nasri Nader's research, Beirut, Dar al-Mashrek. [In Persian]
 
          Farabi, (1378) Al-Molla, translated by Mohsen Mohajernia, Political Science Quarterly, Bagheral Uloom University, second year, vol. 6. [In Persian]
 
Faramarz Qaramelki, Ahad, (2006) Methodology of Religious Studies, Mashhad, Razavi University of Sciences, 4th edition. [In Persian]
 
Kirill, H.J. (2010), Confucius and the Chinese Way, first edition, Tehran, Soroush. [In Persian]
 
Confucius, (1375), Conversations, translated by Kazemzadeh Iranshahr, Tehran, 6th edition, scientific and cultural. [In Persian]
 
McKay, Tom and Marsh, David (2010); Comparative method, taken from the book Theory and Method in Political Science by Marsh and Jerry Stoker, translator: Amir Mohammad Haji Yousefi, Tehran: Research Institute of Strategic Studies, Volume 6. [In Persian]
 
Mencius, (1400), "Book of Mencius", translator: Ehsan Dostmohammadi, first edition, Phoenix. [In Persian]
 
Mohajernia, Mohsen, (1380), State in Farabi's Political Thought, Tehran, Contemporary Cultural Institute of Knowledge and Thought. [In Persian]
 
Mehrania, Hossein (2013); The relationship between religion and the state in Hegel's philosophical system, Wisdom and Philosophy Quarterly, 7th year, 1st issue, 109-136. [In Persian]
 
Vincent, Andrew; (1376) theories of government; Hossein Bushriyeh, first edition, Tehran, Ni publication. [In Persian]
Yu-Lan, Fang, (1380), History of Chinese Philosophy, Farid Javaher Kalam, Tehran, Ch1, Farzan. [In Persian]
 
 
. Yao, Xinzhong.( 2000), An introduction to Confucianism. Cambridge: Cambridge
Berthrong, (2000),  John H.and Evelyn Nagai Berthrong;. Confucianism; A short
Crone, Patricia, (2005).  gods rule . government and islam . six centuries of medieval Islamic. political though .
Crone, Patricia, (2005). Medieval Islamic Political Thought, Edinburgh University Press, New Ed edition. ISBN 0-7486-2194-6
Frankfort, Henry (1961), before philosophy, London, Pelican.
idenheimer, Arnold J.; Hugh Heclo; Carolyn Teich Adams, (1983), Comparative Public Policy. St. Martin's Press.
Kim, Sungmoon, (2011),C onfucian Constitutionalism: Mencius and Xunzi on Virtue, Ritual, and Royal Transmission, Vol. 73, No. 3 (SUMMER 2011), pp. 371-399
Kim, Sungmoon, (2020), Theorizing Confucian Virtue Politics: The Political Philosophy of Mencius and Xunzi, Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Mahdi, Mohsen, (2007), Farabi: Foundation for Islamic Political Philosophy, Princeton.
Mahdi,Mohsen, ,(1968), Alfarabi’ sphilosophy of plato and Aristotle, tr. Mith trodRerised end (New) ourk: Cornell unive prss.
Menius, (1970), the works of Mencis. Iames Legge. New Yourk.
University Press,
Van Norden, Bryan (2017). Mencius. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Edward N. Zalta, ed.
Yo-Lan, Fung , (1948); A short history of Chinese philosophy, New Yourk The Macmillan press.
Yu-lan, Fung, (1952), a history of Chinese Philosophy, eng, Trans, Derk Bodde, London: George Allen and Unwin.Thome, Fang (1980), The Chinese view of life, Taipei: Linking Publishing co, Ltd
introduction. Oxford One world, . Confucius. (1955), The sayigs of connfucius. translated by James R. Ware. New York: Mentor