@article { author = {Khalili, Mohsen}, title = {Conflict of Electronic Democracy with Electronic Government}, journal = {State Studies}, volume = {1}, number = {3}, pages = {1-32}, year = {2016}, publisher = {Allameh Tabataba’i University}, issn = {2476-2806}, eissn = {2476-6828}, doi = {10.22054/tssq.2016.2451}, abstract = {Purpose: The aim of the present paper with emphasis on the main and original functions of states is showing the supremacy of state in the time of hegemony of the instruments and concepts of cyberspace over the linkage between rulers and obedient; although, the citizens have become more agile and more aware too. E-government refers to the use by government institutions of information technologies that have the ability to transform relations with citizens, businesses, and other branches of government. These technologies can serve a variety of different ends: better delivery of government services to citizens, improved interactions with business and industry, citizen empowerment through access to information, or more efficient government management. As we speak of E- government as an instrument, concept and process, indeed, we have spoken of the continuity of the old phenomenon in response to the new questions of new governing a society. Electronic government is made of the distinguishable distinction between the old and the new definitions and functions of states with these advantages: The use of E- government, as a tool to achieve better government; the use of information and communication technologies in all facets of the operations of a government organization; the continuous optimization of service delivery, constituency participation and governance by transforming internal and external relationships through technology, the Internet and new media. The ultimate goal of the e-government is to be able to offer an increased portfolio of  public services to citizens in an efficient and cost effective manner. E-government helps simplify processes and makes government information more easily accessible for public sector agencies and citizens. Design/Methodology/Approach: This paper is formed and based on the critical paradigm with the descriptive method for comparison explanation of the new perception of the legitimacy. Findings: The new achievement of this paper is reconfirmation of the classic and original mechanisms of all of states; such as force, enticement, persuasion, compulsion, command, requirement, replacement, dismissal, law and order. But, primary reason of governmentality in the era of the electronic government has changed to a triangle of rightfulness, lawfulness and effectiveness. The intent of original and first reason of statesmanship is the immemorial concept of legitimacy. Now, in the consequence of the new finding of the present paper, it seems that the question (why we ought to obey the government?) is not sufficient and correct. In other words, nowadays the new question (how does state become stable and continuous?) has been more efficient and right. Originality/Value: Cyberspace is an indicative of the new epoch which contains much difference with former period. Some new concepts of the space of politics such as globalization, global village, electronic state, cyberspace, cyber democracy, virtual civil society, have caused to change the operations of states. States, in the newfound of the era of virtualization of politics, use the soft power, such as propaganda, influence, parade, integration, exhibiting, attraction, and mentality making for durability.}, keywords = {State,Electronic Government,Democracy,Electronic Democracy}, title_fa = {کشاکشِ دولت الکترونیک با دموکراسی الکترونیک}, abstract_fa = {فضای مجازی نشان‌دهنده‌ی دورانِ جدیدی است‌که با زمانه‌ی پیشین ناهمانندی دارد. برخی از مفاهیمِ نوپیدا در عرصه‌ی سیاست، همانندِ جهانی‌شدن، دهکده‌ی جهانی، دولت الکترونیک، فضای مجازی، دموکراسی سایبر، جامعه‌ی مدنی مجازی، سبب شده‌اند عملکرد دولت‌ها دچار تغییر شود. هدف نوشتار این است ‌که با بهره‌گیری از کار ویژه‌های اصیلِ دولت نشان دهد که در روزگارِ برتری ابزارها و مفاهیمِ فضای مجازی بر پیوند فرمان‌بران و فرمان‌روایان، می‌بایست توجه کرد که دولت، همچنان بر فضای سیاست، حکمفرما است، گرچه، شهروندان نیز چابک‌تر و آگاه‌تر شده‌اند. ارزش‌افزوده‌ای که در این نوشتار بدان دسترسی و تأکید شده، این است‌ که دولت‌ها، در عرصه‌ی زمامداری، همچنان از سازوکارهای زور و تطمیع و وادارسازی و اجبار و فرمان و الزام و جایگزینی و برکناری و قانون بهره می‌گیرند. اما، دلیلِ نخستینِ حکومت‌گری، در دوران دولت الکترونیک، تغییر چهره داده و به مقوله‌ای سه‌پایه (حقّانیت، قانونیت، کارآمدی) تبدیل شده است. منظور از دلیلِ نخستین، همان مفهومِ دیرین «مشروعیت (Legitimacy)» است. ولی، به‌جای پرسشِ «چرا از یک حکومت باید اطاعت کرد»، امروزه این پرسش که «چگونه یک حکومت پابرجاتر می‌شود»، درست‌تر است. اگر در دورانِ هژمونی رویکردِ کلاسیکِ سیاست، این جنبه‌های سختِ قدرت بود که بر پیوند فرمان‌بران و فرمان‌روایان، حاکم بود، اکنون، در دورانِ نوظهورِ مجازی‌شدگی و سایبری‌شدنِ سیاست، افزون بر قدرت سخت، دولت‌ها از قدرت نرم (تبلیغ، نفوذ، جلوه، ادغام، نمایش، جاذبه، ذهنیت‌سازی) برای پایایی خود، بهره می‌گیرند. این نوشتار مبتنی برروش‌شناسی انتقادی است. }, keywords_fa = {دولت,دولت الکترونیک,دموکراسی,دموکراسی الکترونیک}, url = {https://tssq.atu.ac.ir/article_2451.html}, eprint = {https://tssq.atu.ac.ir/article_2451_e39c2cd53ea6afcb8148016efd32ecb1.pdf} }