@article { author = {Ghafari, Masoud and Tarjoman, Fariba}, title = {State Bureaucracy and Departure of Some Experts from Iran: Aomparative Introduction}, journal = {State Studies}, volume = {1}, number = {2}, pages = {167-198}, year = {2015}, publisher = {Allameh Tabataba’i University}, issn = {2476-2806}, eissn = {2476-6828}, doi = {10.22054/tssq.2015.1809}, abstract = {Purpose: The present study aims to investigate the relationship between inefficient bureaucracy and specialists’ exit from Iran in the ninth and tenth government time period as the main question of the research in the framework of this hypothesis that bureaucratic inefficiency in Iran is one of the factors influencing specialists’ exit. Studying the key elements of the bureaucracy based on legal-rational authority in combination with the characteristics of efficient and inefficient governments and the theory of attraction and repulsion can be an appropriate criterion in this study to show how the government can exclude itself from the faction of inefficient government and make itself closer to efficient government by reducing their roles and attracting skilled and capable persons. In this way, the government helps to reduce the specialists’ exit from the country and finally provide development.Design/Methodology/Approach: Generally, the government role in developing mentioned viewpoints is placed in two groups. First, individuals who believe in minor role of the government and emphasize on the society and its role; and individuals who believe in major role of the government and emphasize on the government as the main body of the development. Peter Owens is placed in the second group and defines two categories of ineffective and effective governments. On the other hand, since the formation of the modern government and bureaucracy in Iran, it was inefficient. The methodology used in this study is "institutionalist".Findings: The results show that Ahmadinejad government is categorized in the group of inefficient countries, with inefficient administrative structures. It didn’t have the power of long-term goals in order to have operational development programs. It had failed to act going beyond short-term interests of in-power political groups, and hasn’t been able to create the necessary stability in the social and economic space for attracting attention of new professionals and entrepreneurs or putting them in the direction of determined targets. Since achieving profitability is the most important motivation of the professionals and entrepreneurs in the private sector, and of the all economic actors outside the government to participate in development projects, it can be seen that the ninth and tenth government, because of increasing of their roles in the form of bureaucracy, becomes the largest competitor in the private sector. To the extent that the government capacity to make maximum use power and expertise of entrepreneurs and competent human resources to advance the development agenda has been reduced. And this caused to the loss of legitimacy and government efficiency near professionals and entrepreneurs groups and finally, caused to the indiscriminate leaving of experts and efficient staff from the country.Originality/Value: This study can provide a theoretical framework to examine the impact of the failure of the consolidated government forces in other. On this basis we can determine the relationship between the solutions necessary to reduce the exit of specialists from Iran at any returns when presented .This could be effective step towards development.}, keywords = {Inefficient bureaucracy,inefficient government,departure of experts}, title_fa = {بوروکراسی دولتی و خروج برخی نیروهای متخصص از ایران: درآمدی مقایسه‏ای}, abstract_fa = {در زمینه‌ی نقش دولت در توسعه دیدگاه‌های مطرح شده به‌طور کلی به دو دسته قابل تقسیم‌اند. کسانی‌که برای دولت قائل به نقش حداقلی هستند و تاکید بر جامعه و نقش آن دارند و کسانی‌که برای دولت نقش حداکثری قائل هستند و دولت را کارگزار اصلیِ توسعه می‌دانند. «پیتر اونز» در دسته دوم قرار می‌گیرد و مفهوم دولت ناکارآمد را در مقابل دولت کارآمد معرفی می‌کند. از زمان شکل‌گیری دولتِ مدرن در ایران و توسعه‌ی بوروکراسی شاهدِ ناکارآمدی آن بوده‌ایم؛ تداوم این مسئله به ناکارمدی دولت، خروج نیروهای متخصص از کشور و تعمیق توسعه نیافتگی کشور انجامیده است. پژوهشِ حاضر تلاش دارد تا رابطه‌ی بوروکراسی ناکارآمد و خروج نیروهای متخصص از ایران در دولت نهم و دهم در قالب این فرضیه که ناکارآمدی بوروکراتیک در ایران از عوامل تاثیرگذار بر خروج نیروهای متخصص است؛ مورد بررسی قرار دهد. در این راستا تاکید بر بوروکراسی کارآمد و انطباق آن با بوروکراسی وبری سبب می‌شود تا در کنار نظریه‌ی اونز، نظریه‌ی بوروکراسی وبر نیز به‌کار گرفته شود. در نهایت بررسی عناصر کلیدی بوروکراسی مبتنی بر اقتدار عقلانی- قانونی در ترکیب با ویژگی‌های دولت‌های کارآمد و ناکارآمد و نظریه‌ی جاذبه و دافعه می‌تواند معیار مناسبی باشد، تا نشان دهد چگونه دولت می‌تواند با کاستن از نقش‌های خود و جذب نیروهای متخصص و توانمند، خود را از جرگه‌ی دولت ناکارآمد خارج و به دولت کارآمد نزدیک و به این شیوه زمینه را برای کاهش روندِ خروج نیروهای متخصص از کشور و در نهایت تحقق توسعه فراهم آورد.}, keywords_fa = {بوروکراسی ناکارآمد,دولت ناکارآمد,خروج نیروهای متخصص}, url = {https://tssq.atu.ac.ir/article_1809.html}, eprint = {https://tssq.atu.ac.ir/article_1809_99823618ae836f90d6f9f55d493d85d5.pdf} }